The proliferation of empirical inquiries into concepts such as ‘interactivity’ and ‘virtual reality’ has been at the expense of the theoretical (or metadiscursive) in new media studies. The greatest consequence of empiricism’s inductive hierarchies is an ontological negation of the body, the subject in corporeal space. Far from producing a ‘new’ subjectivity, such a negation only reifies a subject’s disembodiment and wholly abstracts the space around them. Examining the writings of many critics and theorists, most significantly Mark Hansen and the spatial theory of Henri Lefebvre, this argument shows that the theoretical must first and foremost be held accountable to itself if the ‘new’ is to be realized. The stakes in this piece are the subject’s embodiment and very ability to articulate itself as ‘I’ in an information-saturated age that challenges the distinction between virtuality and corporeality, a challenge that conceptually bankrupts acts of distinction and differentiation.
Aarseth, Espen ( 1997) Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
Aarseth, Espen ( 2003) ‘We All Want to Change the World: The Ideology of Innovation in Digital Media’, in Gunnar Liestøl, Andrew Morrison and Terje Rasmussen (eds) Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, pp. 415-39. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Apollinaire, Guillaume ( 1971) Selected Writings of Guillaume Apollinaire (trans. Roger Shattuck). New York: New Directions .
4.
Back, Maribeth ( 2003) ‘The Reading Senses: Designing Texts for Multisensory Systems’, in Gunnar Liestøl, Andrew Morrison and Terje Rasmussen (eds) Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, pp. 157-82. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
5.
Barlow, John Perry ( 2001) ‘A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace’ , in Peter Ludlow (ed.) Crypto Anarchy, Cyberstates, and Pirate Utopias, pp. 27-30. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Baudrillard, Jean ( 2001) ‘Simulations’, in Richard Kearney and David Rasmussen (eds) Continental Aesthetics: Romanticism to Postmodernism, pp. 411-30. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
Danielewski, Mark Z. ( 2000) House of Leaves. New York: Pantheon.
8.
Descartes, René ( 1956) Discourse on Method (trans. Laurence Lafleur). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing .
9.
Downes, Edward J. and Sally J. McMillan ( 2000) ‘Defining Interactivity: A Qualitative Identification of Key Dimensions’, New Media & Society2(2): 157-79.
10.
Gotved, Stine ( 2006) ‘Time and Space in Cyber Social Reality’, New Media & Society8(3): 467-86.
11.
Hansen, Mark ( 2000) Embodying Technesis: Technology beyond Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12.
Hansen, Mark ( 2004) New Philosophy for New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Hansen, Mark ( 2006) Bodies in Code: Interfaces with Digital Media. New York: Routledge.
14.
Ingold, Tim ( 1999) ‘Foreword’, in Marcia-Anne Dobres and Christopher R. Hoffman (eds) The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics, and World Views, pp. vii-xi. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
15.
Kiousis, Spiro ( 2002) ‘Interactivity: A Concept Explication’, New Media & Society4(3): 355-83.
16.
Kolko, Beth (ed.) (2003) ‘Introduction: The Reality of Unreality’, in Virtual Publics, pp. 1-7. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
Lefebvre, Henri ( 1991[1974]) The Production of Space (trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith). Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
Liestøl, Gunnar ( 2003) ‘"Gameplay": From Synthesis to Analysis (and Vice Versa): Topics of Conceptualization and Construction in Digital Media’ , in Gunnar Liestøl, Andrew Morrison and Terje Rasmussen (eds) Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, pp. 389-413. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
19.
Liestøl, Gunnar, Andrew Morrison and Terje Rasmussen (eds) (2003) ‘Introduction’, in Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, pp. 1-11. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Manovich, Lev ( 2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Poster, Mark ( 1999) ‘Undetermination’, New Media & Society1(1): 12-17.
22.
Poster, Mark ( 2001) The Information Subject. London: Routledge.
23.
Poster, Mark ( 2003) ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Virtual: Ethics in the Age of Information’, in Gunnar Liestøl , Andrew Morrison and Terje Rasmussen (eds) Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, pp. 521-45. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Richards, Russell ( 2006) ‘Users, Interactivity and Generation’, New Media & Society8(4): 531-50.
25.
Röhle, Theo ( 2005) ‘Power, Reason, Closure: Critical Perspectives on New Media Theory’, New Media & Society7(3): 403-22.
26.
Russo, John Paul ( 2005) The Future without a Past: The Humanities in a Technological Society. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
27.
Silverstone, Roger ( 1999) ‘What’s New about New Media? Introduction’ , New Media & Society1(1): 10-12.
28.
Thomas, Douglas ( 2005) ‘Hacking the Body: Code, Performance and Corporeality’ , New Media & Society7(5): 647-62.
29.
Virilio, Paul ( 2004) The Paul Virilio Reader (ed. Steve Redhead). New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
Wiener, Norbert ( 2001) ‘Cybernetics in History’, in Randall Packer and Ken Jordan (eds) Multimedia: from Wagner to Virtual Reality, pp. 47-54. New York: W.W. Norton.
