This article examines the emerging phenomenon of humanoid social robots and human-humanoid interactions. A central argument of this article is that humanoid social robots belong to a special type of robotic technology used for communicating and interacting with humans. These robotic entities, which can be in either mechanical or digital form, are autonomous, interactive and humanlike. Some of them are used to interact with humans for utilitarian purposes and others are designed to trigger human emotions. Incorporation of such robotic entities into the realm of social life invariably alters the condition as well as the dynamics of human interaction, giving rise to a synthetic society in which humans co-mingle with humanoids. More research is needed to investigate the social and cultural impact of this unfolding robotic revolution.
Aarseth, E. (2003) ‘We All Want to Change the World: The Ideology of Innovation in Digital Media’, in G. Liestol , A. Morrison and T. Rasmussen (eds) Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, pp. 415-439. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Allen, J. , M. S. Hunnicutt and D. H. Klatt (1987) From Text to Speech: the MITalk System. New York: Cambridge University Press .
3.
American Heritage Dictionary (1991) Second College Edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin .
4.
American Heritage Dictionary for Windows (1994) Cambridge, MA: SoftKey International Inc.
Androidworld (2002) ‘Valerie, a Domestic Android’, URL (consulted December 2004): http://www.androidworld.com/prod19.htm
7.
Bainbridge, W. S. , E. E. Brent , K. M. Carley , D. R. Heise , M. W. Macy , B. Markovsky and J. Skvoretz (1994) ‘Artificial Social Intelligence’ , Annual Review of Sociology20: 407-436 .
8.
Bates, J. (1992) ‘Virtual Reality, Art and Entertainment’ , Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environment1(1): 133-137 .
9.
Bell, D. and B. M. Kennedy (eds) (2000) The Cybercultures Reader. New York: Routledge .
10.
Biocca, F. (1992) ‘Communication Within Virtual Reality: Creating a Space for Research’ , Journal of Communication42(4): 5-22 .
11.
Breazeal, C. L. (2000) ‘Robot in Society: Friend or Appliance’, URL (consulted December 2004): http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/jvelas/ebaa99/breazeal-ebaa99.pdf
12.
Breazeal, C. L. (2001) Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
13.
Brennan, S. E. and J. O. Ohaeri (1994) ‘Effects of Message Style on Users’ Attributions Toward Agents’, in Celebrating Interdependence: Conference Companion for the 1994 ACM/SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 281-282. New York: ACM Press .
14.
Brooks, R. A. (1999) Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
15.
Brooks, R. A. (2002) Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon Book .
16.
Bumby, K. E. and K. Dautenhahn (2000) ‘Investigating Children’s Attitudes Towards Robots: a Case Study’, URL (consulted December 2004): http://www.cyber.rdg.ac.uk/people/kd/WWW/home.html
17.
Carley, K. (1996) ‘Artificial Intelligence Within Sociology’ , Sociological Methods & Research25(1): 3-30 .
18.
Carlsson, C. (1995) ‘The Shape of Truth to Come: New Media and Knowledge’, in J. Brooks and I. A. Baol (eds) Resisting the Virtual Life: the Culture and Politics of Information, pp. 235-244. San Francisco, CA: City Lights .
19.
Cassell, J. , T. Bickmore , L. Campbell , H. Vilhjalmsson and H. Yan (2000) ‘Human Conversation as a System Framework: Designing Embodied Conversational Agents’, in J. Cassell , J. Sullivan , S. Prevost and E. Churchill (eds) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 29-63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
20.
Collins, H. M. (1990) Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
21.
Collins, R. (1992) Sociological Insight. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
22.
Cooley, C. H. (1902) Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner’s .
23.
Dautenhahn, K. (1998) ‘The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction and the Human in the Loop’ , Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal, Special Issue on Socially Intelligent Agents12(7-8): 573-617 .
24.
Dautenhahn, K. and A. Billard (2002) ‘Games Children with Autism Can Play with Robota, a Humanoid Robotic Doll’, URL (consulted December 2004): http://homepages.feis.herts.ac.uk/%7Ecomqkd/DautenhahnBillardweb.pdf
25.
Dertouzos, M. L. (1998) What Will Be: How the New World of Information Will Change Our Lives. New York: HarperCollins .
26.
Dertouzos, M. L. (2001) The Unfinished Revolution: Human-Centered Computers and What They Can Do for Us. New York: HarperCollins .
27.
DiMaggio, P. , E. Hargittai , W. R. Neuman and J. P. Robinson (2001) ‘Social Implications of the Internet’ , Annual Review of Sociology27: 307-336 .
28.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1992) What Computers Still Can’t Do: a Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
29.
Engelbart, D. C. (1963) ‘A Conceptual Framework for the Augmentation of Man’s Intellect’, in P, Howerton (ed.) The Augmentation of Man’s Intellect by Machine, Vistas in Information Handling, Vol. 1, pp. 1-27. Washington, DC: Spartan Books .
30.
Foner, L. N. (2000) ‘Are We Having Fun Yet? Using Social Agents in Social Domains’, in K. Dautenhahn (ed.) Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology, pp. 323-348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
31.
Forsyth, R. (1984) ‘The Architecture of Expert Systems’, in R. Forsyth (ed.) Expert Systems: Principles and Case Studies, pp. 9-17. New York: Chapman and Hall .
32.
Frude, N. (1984) The Robot Heritage. London: Century .
33.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
34.
Gill, K. S. (ed.) (1996) Human Machine Symbiosis: the Foundations of Human-Centered Systems Design. London: Springer .
35.
Goffman, E. (1963) Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press .
36.
Goodwins, R. (2001) ‘ALICE Victorious in AI Challenge’ , ZDNet, 15 October, URL (consulted December 2004): http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-53090.html
37.
Green, N. (1993) ‘Can Computers Have Genders?’ , paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Washington, DC, May.
38.
Hammond, R. (2000) ‘Robots for Kids: The Landscape’, in A. Druin and J. Hendler (eds) Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning, pp. 338-352. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann .
39.
Hapgood, F. (2001) ‘Look Who’s Talking’, URL (consulted December 2004): http://www.cio.com/archieve/101501/et_revisit.html
40.
Hiltz, S. R. and M. Turoff (1978) The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
41.
Horton, D. and R. R. Wohl (1979) ‘Mass Communication and Parasocial Interaction: Observation on Intimacy at a Distance’, in G. Gumpert and R. Cathcart (eds) Inter/Media: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World, pp. 32-55. New York: Oxford University Press .
Kerr, G. (2002) ‘Robots Bring Dubious Cheer to the Lonely Elderly’ , Asahi Shimbun News Service, 23 April.
44.
Laxon, A. (2001) ‘Making a Machine More Like a Man’ , New Zealand Herald, 22 October, URL (accessed 10 April 2006): http://www.nzherald.co.nz/category/story.cfm?c_id=55&objectid=223892
45.
Lee, K. F. (1989) Automatic Speech Recognition: The Development of the SPHINX System. Boston, MA: Kluwer .
46.
Lenat, D. B. and R. V. Guha (1990) Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
47.
Liestol, G. (2003) ‘“Gameplay”: From Synthesis to Analysis (and Vice Versa)’, in G. Liestol , A. Morrison and T. Rasmussen (eds) Digital Media Revisited: theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, pp. 389-413. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
48.
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social System. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
49.
Mauldin, M. (1994) ‘ChatterBots, TinyMUDs and the Turing Test: Entering the Loebner Prize Competition’ , in Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1, pp. 16-21 . Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
50.
Mayer, P. A. (1999) ‘Computer Media Studies: an Emergent Field’, in P. A. Mayer (ed.) Computer Media and Communication: A Reader, pp. 320-336. Oxford: University Press .
51.
Menzel, P. and F. D’Aluisio (2000) Robo Sapiens: Evolution of a New Species. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
52.
Minsky, M. (1967) Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
53.
Nass, C. and J. Steuer (1993) ‘Anthropomorphism, Agency and Ethopoeia: Computers as Social Actors’ , Human Communication Research19(4): 504-527 .
54.
Nass, C. , J. Steuer , L. Henriksen and D. C. Dryer (1994) ‘Machines, Social Attributions, and Ethopoeia: Performance Assessments of Computers Subsequent to “Self ” or “Other” Evaluations’ , International Journal of Human-Computer Studies40(3): 543-559 .
55.
Nass, C. , Y. Moon , B. J. Fogg , B. Reeves and D. C. Dryer (1995) ‘Can Computer Personalities Be Human Personalities?’ , International Journal of Human-Computer Studies40(3): 223-239 .
Norman, D. A. (1990) ‘Why Interfaces Don’t Work’, in B. Laurel (ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design, pp. 209-219. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
58.
Norman, D. A. (1993) Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machines. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
59.
O’Mahony, M. (2002) Cyborg: The Man-Machine. New York: Thames & Hudson .
60.
Ong, W. J. (1982) Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the World. London: Methuen .
61.
Pepperell, R. (1995) The Post-Human Condition. Oxford: Intellect .
62.
Poster, M. (2002) ‘High-Tech Frankenstein, or Heidegger Meets Stelarc’, in J. Zylinska (ed.) The Cyborg Experiments: the Extensions of the Body in the Media Age, pp. 15-32. New York: Continuum .
63.
Rasmussen, T. (2003) ‘On Distributed Society: The Internet as a Guide to a Sociological Understanding of Communication’, in G. Liestol , A. Morrison and T. Rasmussen (eds) Digital Media Revisted: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, pp. 443-467. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
64.
Restivo, S. (2001) ‘Bringing Up and Booting Up: Social Theory and the Emergence of Sociologically Intelligent Robots’, URL (consulted December 2004): http://www.rpi.edu/dept/sts/restivo/socialrobots/sirs.doc
65.
Rheingold, H. (1993) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
66.
Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press .
67.
Searle, J. R. (1990) ‘Is the Brain’s Mind a Computer Program?’Scientific American262(1): 26-31 .
68.
Stelarc (2000) ‘From Psycho-Body to Cyber-Systems: Images as Post-Human Entities’, in D. Bell and B. M. Kennedy (eds) The Cybercultures Reader, pp. 560-576. New York: Routledge .
69.
Stronks, J. J. S. (2002) ‘Friendship Relations with Embodied Conversational Agents: Integrating Social Psychology in ECA Design’, URL (consulted December 2004) http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/%7Eheylen/Publicaties/chi-sat-2002.pdf
70.
Suchman, L. A. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
71.
Takahashi, D. (1998) ‘Sensory Circuits’ Cheap Chip Has People Talking’ , Wall Street Journal, 10 March, URL (accessed 10 April 2006): http://www.vossystems.com/articles/2000/vnp_wallstreetleft.htm
72.
Turkle, S. (1984) The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster .
73.
Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone .
74.
Weizenbaum, J. (1966) ‘A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine’ , Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery9(1): 36-45 .
75.
Wessells, M. G. (1990) Computer, Self and Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
76.
Wiener, N. (1950) The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin .
77.
Wolfe, A. (1991) ‘Mind, Self, Society and Computer: Artificial Intelligence and the Sociology of Mind’ , American Journal of Sociology96(5): 1073-1096 .
78.
Wolfe, A. (1993) The Human Difference: Animals, Computers, and the Necessity of Social Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
79.
Woodall, M. (2001) ‘Taking a Critical Look at the Toys that Bond’ , Philadelphia Inquirer, 20 September, URL (accessed 10 April 2006): http://www.temple.edu/ispr/examples/ex01_09_20.html
80.
Wosk, J. (1992) Breaking Frame: Technology and the Visual Arts in the Nineteenth Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
81.
Zhao, S. (2003) ‘Toward a Taxonomy of Co-presence’ , Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environment12(5): 445-455 .
82.
Zylinska, J. (ed.) (2002) The Cyborg Experiments: The Extensions of the Body in the Media Age. New York: Continuum .
