The available research indicates mixed results regarding the internet’s role in social relations. The article contributes to this research by studying the provision of support in egocentred social networks. Data regarding size, structure and communication channels were assessed through two specially designed surveys. The results show that the internet has a relatively limited impact on social relationships. Internet users have slightly larger social networks only in certain socially de-privileged segments (e.g. divorced, less educated). However, they reveal some specifics with respect to the structure of networks (more friends and less kin, weaker ties) and communication channels (typically the internet is used as a complement). The article also illustrates certain serious problems when drawing a causal inference from non-experimental data.
Anderson, B. and K. Tracey (2001) ‘Digital Living: The Impact (or Otherwise) of the Internet on Everyday Life’ , American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 456-475 .
2.
Andrews, F. , J. Morgan and J. Sonquist (1973) Multiple Classification Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research .
3.
Baym, N.K. , Y.B. Zhang and M.C. Lin (2004) ‘Social Interactions Across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Telephone and Face-to-face’ , New Media & Society6(3): 299-318 .
4.
Bier, M. and M. Gallo (1997) ‘Personal Empowerment in the Study of Home Internet Use by Low-income Families’ , Journal of Research on Computing in Education30(2): 107-121 .
5.
Burt, R.S. (1984) ‘Network Items and the General Social Survey’ , Social Networks6(4): 293-339 .
6.
Burt, R.S. (1991) ‘Measuring Age as a Structural Concept’ , Social Networks13(1): 1-34 .
7.
Choi, J.H. and J. Danowski (2002) ‘Making a Global Community on the Net - Global Village or Global Metropolis?: A Network Analysis of Usenet Newsgroups’ , Journal of Computer Mediated Communication7(3), URL (consulted August 2002): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol7/issue3/choi.html.
8.
Coget, J.F. , Y. Yamauchi and M. Suman (2002) ‘The Internet, Social Networks and Loneliness’ , IT & Society1(1): 180-201, URL (consulted January 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a12.pdf.
9.
Cohen, S. and T.A. Wills (1985) ‘Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis’ , Psychological Bulletin98(2): 310-357 .
10.
Coget, J.F. , Y. Yamauchi and M. Suman (2002) ‘The Internet, Social Networks and Loneliness’ , IT & Society1(1): 180-201 , URL (consulted Jan. 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a12.pdf.
11.
Couper, M.P. (2000) ‘Web Surveys: a Review of Issues and Approaches” , Public Opinion Quarterly64(4): 464-495 .
12.
Dimmick, J. , S.L. Kline and L. Stafford (2000) ‘The Gratification Niches of Personal Email and the Telephone: Competition, Displacement, and Complementarity’ , Communication Research27(2): 227-248 .
13.
Ferligoj, A. , T. Kogovšek , P. Dremelj , V. Hlebec and M. Novak (2002) Omrežja socialnih opor prebivalstva Slovenije (Social Support Networks of the Slovenian Population). Research Report and Code Book. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences, and Social Protection Institute of the Republic of Slovenia .
14.
Fisher, C.S. (1982) To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
15.
Franzen, A. (2002) ‘Social Capital and the New Communication Technologies’, in J. Katz (ed.) Machines that Become Us, pp. 105-116. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers .
16.
Granovetter, M.S. (1982) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited’, in P.V. Marsden and N. Lin (eds) Social Structure and Network Analysis, pp. 105-130. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
17.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2000) ‘Online Personal Networks. Size, Composition and Media Use Among Distance Learners’ , New Media & Society2(2): 195-226 .
18.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2001) ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’ , American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 363-382 .
19.
Hlebec V. and T. Kogovšek (2003) ‘Konceptualizacija socialne opore’ (‘Conceptualizing Social Support’) , Družšboslovne razprave19(43): 103-125 .
20.
Horrigan, J.B. and L. Rainie (2002) ‘Emails that Matter: Changing Patterns of Internet Use Over a Year’s Year’s Time’ , IT & Society1(1): 135-150 , URL (consulted January 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a09.pdf.
21.
Howard, P.E.N. , L. Rainie and S. Jones (2001) ‘Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of a Diffusing Technology’ , American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 382-403 .
22.
Katz, J.E. and R.E. Rice (2002) ‘Project Syntopia: Social Consequences of Internet Use’ , IT & Society1(1): 166-179 , URL (consulted September 2002): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a11.pdf.
23.
Katz, J.E. , R.E. Rice and P. Aspden (2001) ‘The Internet, 1995-2000: Access, Civic Involvement, and Social Interaction’ , American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 404-418 .
24.
Kavanaugh, A.L. and S.J. Patterson (2001) ‘The Impact of Community Computer Networks on Social Capital and Community Involvement’ , American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 496-509 .
25.
Kiesler, S. , R. Kraut , J. Cummings , B. Boneva , V. Helgeson and A. Crawford (2002) ‘Social Leisure and Home IT: A Time-diary Approach’ , IT & Society1(1): 54-72 , URL (consulted January 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a05.pdf.
26.
Kraut, R. , S. Kiesler , T. Mukhopadhyay , W. Scherlis and M. Patterson (1998) ‘Social Impact of the Internet: What Does it Mean?’ , Communications of the ACM41(12): 21-22 .
27.
Lee, B.K.M. and J.J.H. Zhu (2002) ‘Internet Use and Sociability in Mainland China and Hong Kong’ , IT & Society1(1): 219-237 , URL (consulted January 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a14.pdf.
28.
Leung, L. and P.S.N. Lee (2005) ‘Multiple Determinants of Life Quality: The Roles of Internet Activities, Use of New Media, Social Support, and Leisure Activities’ , Telematics and Informatics, in press.
29.
Liang, G. and B. Wei (2002) ‘Internet Use and Social Life/Attitudes in Urban Mainland China’ , IT & Society1(1): 238-241 , URL (consulted January 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a15.pdf.
30.
Losh, S.C. (2004) ‘Gender, Educational, and Occupational Digital Gaps 1983-2002’ , Social Science Computer Review22(2): 152-166 .
31.
Lozar Manfreda, K. , V. Vehovar and V. Hlebec (2004) ‘Collecting Ego-Centred Network Data Via the Web’ , Metodološki zvezki1(2): 295-321 , URL (consulted February 2005): http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pub/mz/mz1.1/lozar.pdf.
32.
Mandelli, A. (2002) ‘Bounded Sociability, Relationships Costs and Intangible Resources in Complex Digital Networks’ , IT & Society1(1): 251-274 , URL (consulted December 2004): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a17.pdf.
33.
Mikami, S. (2002) ‘Internet Use and Sociability in Japan’ , IT & Society1(1): 242-250 , URL (consulted January 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a16.pdf.
34.
Neuman, W.R. (1991) The Future of the Mass Audience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
35.
Neustadtl, A. and J.P. Robinson (2002) ‘Social Contact Differences Among Internet Users and Nonusers in the General Social Survey’ , IT & Society1(1): 73-102 , URL (consulted January 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a06.pdf.
36.
Nie, N.H. and L. Erbring (2002) ‘Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report’ , IT & Society1(1): 275-283 , URL (consulted December 2004): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a18.pdf.
37.
Norris, P. (2002) ‘The Bridging and Bonding Role of Online Communities’ , Press-Politics Editorial7(3): 3-13 .
38.
‘Population Explosion’ (2005) ClickZ Stats, available at: http://www.clickz.com/stats/big_picture/geographics/article.php/151151
39.
Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster .
40.
Rheingold, H. (1993) The Virtual Communities: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading: Addison-Wesley .
41.
Sarason, B.R. , I.G. Sarason and G.R. Pierce (1990) ‘Traditional Views of Social Support and Their Impact on Assessment’, in B.R. Sarason , I.G. Sarason and G.R. Pierce (eds.) Social Support: An Interactional View, pp. 9-25. New York: Wiley .
42.
Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia (2004) URL (consulted September 2004): http://www.stat.si.
43.
Vaux, A. (1988) Social Support: Theory, Research and Intervention. New York: Praeger Publishers .
44.
Vehovar, V. , Z. Batagelj , K. Lozar Manfreda and M. Zaletel (2002) ‘Nonresponse in Web Surveys’, in R.M. Groves , D.A. Dillman , J.L. Eltinge and R.J.A. Little (eds.) Survey Nonresponse, pp. 229-242. New York: Wiley .
45.
Vehovar, V. and D. Lavtar (2005). Internet Usage in Slovenia 2004. RIS Research Report No 57. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences , URL (consulted March 2005): http://www.ris.org.
46.
Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994) Social Network Analysis - Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
47.
Wellman, B. and S. Wortley (1990) ‘Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support’ , American Journal of Sociology96(3): 558-588 .
48.
Wellman, B. , J. Salaff , D. Dimitrova , L. Garton , M. Gulia and C. Haythornthwaite (1996) ‘Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework and Virtual Community’ , Annual Review of Sociology22: 231-238 .
49.
Wellman, B. , J. Boase and W. Chen (2002) ‘The Networked Nature of Community Online and Offline’ , IT & Society1(1): 151-165 , URL (consulted January 2005): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a10.pdf.
50.
Wellman, B. , J. Salaff , D. Dimitrova , L. Garton , M. Gulia and C. Haythornthwaite (1996) ‘Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community’ , Annual Review of Sociology22: 231-238 .
