While many studies of the web and related technologies of communication have focused on its use, there has been little engagement with the structural properties of the web and related technologies from a broadly social theoretic point of view. This article analyses pressures on the technological development of the web from the perspective of the Habermasian concepts of colonization and juridification. On this analysis, legal and quasi-legal tendencies can be seen to restrict the uses and development of the structures of the world wide web, as I will show with the use of several case studies.
Adorno, T. and M. Horkheimer (1997) Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso .
2.
Berners-Lee, T. (1989) ‘Information Management: A Proposal’, URL (consulted July 2004): http://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html
3.
Berners-Lee, T. (1997) ‘Links and Laws: Myths’, URL (consulted July 2004): http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkMyths.html
4.
Berners-Lee, T. (1998) ‘Realising the Full Potential of the Web’, URL (consulted September 2002): http://www.w3.org/1998/02/Potential.html
5.
Berners-Lee, T. (1999) ‘Talk to the LCS 35th Anniversary Celebrations’, Cambridge, MA , URL (consulted September 2002): http://www.w3.org/1999/04/13-tbl.html
6.
Berry, D. (2004) ‘The Contestation of Code: a Preliminary Investigation into the Discourse of the Free Software and Open Software Movement’ , Critical Discourse Studies (1)1: 65-89 .
7.
Blizzard, C. (2001) ‘Mozilla.orgResponse to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft’, URL (consulted January 2002): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/1350.html
8.
Calabrese, A. and M. Borchert (1996) ‘Prospects for Electronic Democracy in the United States: Rethinking Communication and Social Policy’ , Media, Culture & Society18(2): 249-268 .
Curran, J. and J. Seaton (1991) Power Without Responsibility. London: Routledge .
11.
Feenberg, A. (1999) Questioning Technology. London: Routledge .
12.
Froomkin, M. (2003) Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, special edition (36)3, URL (consulted May 2004): http://llr.lls.edu/volumes/v36-issue3/
13.
Gibson, J.J. (1977) ‘The Theory of Affordances’, in R. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, pp. 67-82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
14.
Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann .
15.
Habermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: the Critique of Functionalist Reason (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Polity Press .
16.
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press .
17.
Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press .
18.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity Press .
19.
Hauben, R. (1999) ‘The Internet: Public or Private?’ , The Amateur Computerist9(1), URL (consulted July 2004): http://umcc.ais.org/%7Ejrh/acn/Back_Issues/Back_Issues%255b1998-2002%255d/ACN9-1.txt
20.
Introna, L. and H. Nissenbaum (2000) ‘The Public Good Vision of the Internet and the Politics of Search Engines’, in R. Rogers (ed.) Preferred Placement, pp. 25-47. Maastricht: Jan van Eyek Akademie .
21.
Jackson, M. (1997) ‘Assessing the Structures of Communication on the World Wide Web’ , Journal of Computer Mediated Communication3(1), URL (consulted June 2001): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/jackson.html
22.
Kline, R. and T. Pinch (1996) ‘Users as Agents of Technological Change: the Social Construction of the Automobile in the Rural United States’ , Technology and Culture (37)4: 763-795 .
23.
Lessig, L. (1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books .
24.
McChesney, R. (1999) Rich Media, Poor Democracy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press .
25.
McChesney, R. (2002) ‘The Titanic Sails On: Why the Internet Won’t Sink the Media Giants’, in G. Dines and J. Humez (eds) Gender, Race and Class in Media, pp. 677-682. London: Sage .
26.
Nelson, T. (1997) ‘Embedded Markup Considered Harmful’, URL (consulted June 2004): http://www.xml.com/pub/a/w3j/s3.nelson.html
27.
Object Services and Consulting, Inc (1996) ‘Internet Tool Survey’, URL (consulted June 2004): http://www.objs.com/survey/survey.htm
28.
Patelis, K. (2000) ‘The Political Economy of the Internet’, in J. Curran (ed.) Media Organizations in Society, pp. 84-106. London: Arnold .
29.
Patent Policy Working Group (2002) ‘Royalty-free Patent Policy W3C Working Draft’, URL (consulted August 2002): http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-patent-policy-20020226
30.
Pinch, T. and W. Bijker (1984) ‘The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts’ , Social Studies of Science (14)3: 399-441 .
31.
Poster, M. (1984) Foucault, Marxism and History. Cambridge: Polity Press .
32.
Rheingold, H. (2000) The Virtual Community. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
33.
Roberts, M. (2000) ‘Comment on the Civil Society Statement’, URL (consulted August 2001): http://www.cpsr.org/Internetdemocracy/Statement_July-13_Comments.html%23Roberts
34.
Salter, L. (2004) ‘Structure and Forms of Use: A Contribution to Understanding the “Effects” of the Internet on Deliberative Democracy’ , Information, Communication and Society (7)2: 185-206 .
35.
Winston, B. (1998) Media, Technology and Society. A History: From the Telegraph to the Internet. London: Routledge .
36.
Wired (2002) ‘Deep Links Return to Surface’, URL (consulted July 2003): http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51887,00.html
37.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (1998) ‘Micropayments Overview’, URL (consulted July 2004): http://www.w3.org/ECommerce/Micropayments/
38.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (1999) ‘Common Markup for Micropayment Per-Fee-links’, URL (consulted July 2004): http://www.w3.org/TR/WDMicropayment-Markup/
39.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2004) ‘World Wide Web Consortium Process Document’, URL (consulted July 2004): http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/
