This article reconsiders civic involvement and citizen empowerment in the light of interactive media and elaborates the concept of media participation. Departing from conventional notions of political activity which downplay the participatory opportunities inherent in communication media, the authors argue that since 1992 new media formats have made accessible to citizens a political system that had become highly orchestrated, professionalized and exclusionary. A typology of active, passive and inactive political involvement is presented to accurately distinguish civic involvement from political disengagement and to categorize the types of empowerment and rewards - both material and symbolic - that different modes of civic activity afford. Even if only symbolically empowering, civic engagement through new media serves as an important legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy.
Alford, R. and Friedland, R. (1975) `Political Participation and Public Policy', in A. Inkeles, J. Coleman and N. Smelser (eds) Annual Review of Sociology, pp. 429-479. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
2.
Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Arendt, H. (1963) On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.
4.
Barber, B.R. (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Battle of the Sound Bites (1992) TV News Coverage of the 1992 Presidential Election Campaign, Media Monitor7, August/September: 1-6.
6.
Berelson, B. (1952) `Democratic Theory and Public Opinion', Public Opinion Quarterly16(3): 313-330.
7.
Blumler, J.G. (1983) `Communication and Democracy: The Crisis Beyond and the Ferment Within', Journal of Communication33(3): 166-173.
8.
Blumler, J.G. (1990) `Elections, the Media, and the Modern Publicity Process', in M. Ferguson (ed.) Public Communication: The New Imperatives, pp. 101-113. London: Sage.
9.
Blumler, J.G. and Gurevitch, M. (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
10.
Bolter, J.D. and Grusin, R. (1999) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Broder, D.S. (1990) `Democracy and the Press', Washington Post, 3 January: A15.
12.
Buchanan, B. (1991) Electing a President: The Markle Commission Research on Campaign '88. Austin: University of Texas Press.
13.
Bucy, E.P. (2000) `Social Access to the Internet', Press/Politics5(1): 50-61.
14.
Bucy, E.P. and D'Angelo, P. (1999) `The Crisis of Political Communication: Normative Critiques of News and Democratic Processes', Communication Yearbook 22: 301-339.
15.
Bucy, E.P. , D'Angelo, P. and Newhagen, J.E. (1999) `Engaging the Electorate: New Media Use as Political Participation', in L.L. Kaid and D. Bystrom (eds) The Electronic Election: Perspectives on the 1996 Campaign Communication, pp. 335-347. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Bucy, E.P. and Newhagen, J.E. (1999) `The Micro- and Macrodrama of Politics on Television: Effects of Media Format on Candidate Evaluations', Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media43(2): 193-210.
17.
Center for Voting and Democracy (2001) `Voter Turnout', URL (consulted February 2001): http://www.fairvote.org/turnout/index.html
18.
Clinton's the One (1992) TV News Coverage of the 1992 General Election, Media Monitor6, November: 1-6.
19.
Cobb, R.W. and Elder, C.D. (1983) Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building, 2nd edn.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
Conway, M.M. (2000) Political Participation in the United States, 3rd edn.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
21.
Crittenden, J. (1971) `Democratic Functions of the Open Mike Radio Forum', Public Opinion Quarterly35(1): 200-210.
22.
Davis, R. and Owen, D. (1998) New Media and American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Dionne, E.J., Jr (1991) Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
24.
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
25.
Elgin, D. (1993) `Revitalizing Democracy Through Electronic Town Meetings', Spectrum66(2): 6-13.
26.
Federal News Service (1996) `Presidential Debate Between President Bill Clinton and GOP Presidential Candidate Robert Dole', 16 October [online transcript], Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe.
27.
Frantzich, S. and Sullivan, J. (1996) The C-SPAN Revolution. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
28.
Gans, C.B. (1990) `Remobilizing the American Electorate', Policy Studies Review9(3): 527-538.
29.
Golson, B. and Range, P.R. (1992) `Clinton on TV', TV Guide, 21 November: 14-18.
30.
Graber, D.A. (1990) `Seeing Is Remembering: How Visuals Contribute to Learning from Television News', Journal of Communication40(3): 134-155.
31.
Graber, D.A. (1993) `Making Campaign News User Friendly: The Lessons of 1992 and Beyond', American Behavioral Scientist37(2): 328-336.
32.
Gurevitch, M. and Blumler, J.G. (1990) `Political Communication Systems and Democratic Values', in J. Lichtenberg (ed.) Democracy and the Mass Media, pp. 269-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Hacker, K.L. (1996) `Missing Links in the Evolution of Electronic Democratization', Media, Culture & Society18(2): 213-232.
34.
Hallin, D.C. (1992) `Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968-1988', Journal of Communication42(2): 5-24.
35.
Harwood Group (1991) Citizens and Politics: A View from Main Street America. Washington, DC: Kettering Foundation.
36.
Hill, K.A. and Hughes, J.E. (1998) Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
37.
Hollander, B.A. (1995/96) `The Influence of Talk Radio on Political Efficacy and Participation', Journal of Radio Studies3: 23-31.
38.
Horton, D. and Wohl, R.R. (1956) `Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance', Psychiatry19(3): 215-229.
39.
Hume, E. (1991) Restoring the Bond: Connecting Campaign Coverage to Voters: A Report of the Campaign Lessons for `92 Project. Cambridge, MA: The Joan Shorenstein Barone Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard University.
40.
Jamieson, K.H. (1992) Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Kellner, D. (1990) Television and the Crisis of Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
42.
Kerbel, M.R. (1999) Remote & Controlled: Media Politics in a Cynical Age, 2nd edn.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43.
Kourvetaris, G.A. (1997) Political Sociology: Structure and Process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
44.
Laurel, B. (1991) Computers as Theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45.
Lazarsfeld, P. and Merton, R.K. (1948) `Mass Communication, Popular Taste, and Organized Social Action', in L. Bryson (ed.) The Communication of Ideas, pp. 95-118. New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
46.
Lippmann, W. (1922) Public Opinion. New York: The Free Press.
47.
Lippmann, W. (1927) The Phantom Public. New York: Macmillan.
48.
Margolis, M. and Resnick, D. (2000) Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Milbrath, L. W. (1965) Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?Chicago: Rand McNally.
50.
Neuman, W.R. (1986) The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Newhagen, J.E. (1994) `Self Efficacy and Call-in Political Television Show Use', Communication Research21(3): 366-379.
52.
Page, B.I. and Tannenbaum, J. (1996) `Populistic Deliberation and Talk Radio', Journal of Communication46(2): 33-54.
53.
Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press (2000) `The Tough Job of Communicating with Voters: Audiences Fragmented and Skeptical', URL, January (consulted July 2000): http://www.people-press.org/jan00rpt2.htm
55.
Putnam, R.D. (1995) `Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America', PS: Political Science & Politics28(4): 664-683.
56.
Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
57.
Ridout, C.F. (1993) `News Coverage and Talk Shows in the 1992 Presidential Campaign', PS: Political Science & Politics26(4): 712-716.
58.
Robinson, M.J. (1977) `Television and American Politics: 1956-1976', Public Interest48: 3-39.
59.
Rosen, J. (1996) Getting the Connections Right: Public Journalism and the Troubles in the Press. New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.
60.
Rosen, J. and Taylor, P. (1992) The News News v. the Old News: The Press and Politics in the 1990s. New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.
61.
Schattschneider, E.E. (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
62.
Schudson, M. (1998) The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.
63.
Schwartz, E. (1996) Net Activism: How Citizens Use the Internet. Sebastopol, CA: Songline Studios.
64.
Tambini, D. (1999) `New Media and Democracy: The Civic Networking Movement', New Media & Society1(3): 305-329.
65.
Tankel, J.D. (1998) `Reconceptualizing Call-in Talk Radio as Listening', Journal of Radio Studies5(1): 36-47.
66.
Taylor, P. (1990) See How They Run: Electing the President in an Age of Mediaocracy. New York: Random House.
67.
Verba, S. and Nie, N.H. (1987) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Verba, S. , Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H.E. (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
Wu, W. and Weaver, D. (1997) `On-line Democracy or On-line Demagoguery? Public Opinion `Polls' on the Internet', Press/Politics2(4): 71-87.
