The field of organizational studies has extensively examined factors influencing the turnover and succession of public officers, yet limited attention has been given to chiefs of police. Using institutional theory as a framework, this study explores police chief turnover by focusing on the institutional environment and the relationships between police chiefs and key individuals and entities within their communities. Utilizing survey data collected from police chiefs attending mandatory training programs designed for new appointees, the analysis reveals that police chief turnover is substantially associated with the quality of relationships with key stakeholders within the institutional environments, both individually and collectively. In addition, control variables such as police performance, appointment path, tenure length, agency size, and municipal structure were analyzed. Policy implications are discussed.
AertsWCormierDMagnanM (2006) Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: an international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy25(3): 299–331.
2.
AlpertPDunhamGSmithR (2007) Investigating racial profiling by the Miami-Dade Police Department: a multimethod approach. Criminology & Public Policy6: 25–56.
3.
AndreescuVVitoF (2021) Strain, negative emotions and turnover intentions among American police managers. Policing: An International Journal44(6): 970–984.
4.
BarakMNisslyALevinA (2001) Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: what can we learn from past research? A review and meta-analysis. Social Service Review75: 625–661.
5.
BenBLiY (2022) Police executive leadership: an empirical and theoretical exploration of police chief performance. International Journal of Police Science & Management25(1): 55–63.
6.
BittnerE (1967) The police on skid-row: a study of peace keeping. American Sociological Review32: 699–715.
7.
BlumsteinA (1999) Measuring what matters in policing. In: LangworthyRH (ed.) Measuring What Matters: Proceedings From the Policing Research Institute Meetings (NCJ 170610). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, 5–10.
8.
BradyQ(2017)Chief concerns: Identifying the personal and work-related factors associated with job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intentions among police chiefs. Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University, USA.
9.
BradyQKingR (2018) Brass satisfaction: identifying the personal and work-related factors associated with job satisfaction among police chiefs. Police Quarterly21(2): 250–277.
10.
CrankP (1994) Watchman and community: myth and institutionalization in policing. Law and Society Review28: 325–351.
11.
CrankP (2003) Institutional theory of police: a review of the state of the art. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management26(2): 186–207.
12.
CrankPLangworthyR (1992) An institutional perspective of policing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology83: 338–363.
13.
CrankPLangworthyR (1996) Fragmented centralization and the organization of the police. Policing and Society6: 213–229.
14.
DiMaggioJPowellW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
15.
DonaldsonL (1995) American Anti-Management Theories of Organizations: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
EvansRChristopherTStoffelT (2000) Managing employee absenteeism and turnover for competitive advantage. In: TravaglioneAMarshallV (eds) Human Resource Strategies: An Applied Approach. Melbourne, Australia: McGraw-Hill, 272–309.
17.
GiblinJ (2006) Structural elaboration and institutional isomorphism: the case of crime analysis units. Policing: An International Journal29(4): 643–664.
18.
GiblinJBurrussW (2009) Developing a measurement model of institutional processes in policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management32(2): 351–376.
19.
GoldsteinH (1977) Policing a Free Society. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
20.
GriffinMHoganNLambertE (2014) Career stage theory and turnover intent among correctional officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior41: 4–19.
21.
HaganJ (1989) Why is there so little criminal justice theory?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency26: 116–135.
22.
HeugensPLanderW (2009) Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): a meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal52: 61–85.
23.
HilalSLitseyB (2020) Reducing police turnover: recommendations for the law enforcement agency. International Journal of Police Science & Management22(1): 73–83.
24.
HuntGMagenauM (1993) Power and the Police Chiefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
KatzC (2001) The establishment of a police gang unit: an examination of organizational and environmental factors. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal39(1): 37–74.
26.
KatzCMcGuireRRoneckD (2002) A macro-level analysis of the creation of special police gang units: an examination of rational, social threat, and resource dependency perspectives. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management25: 472–506.
27.
KingR (2014) Organizational failure and the disbanding of local police agencies. Crime & Delinquency60(5): 667–692.
28.
KılıçMUyarAKuzeyC, et al. (2021) Does institutional theory explain integrated reporting adoption of fortune 500 companies?Journal of Applied Accounting Research22(1): 114–137.
29.
LaiL (2017) The impact of individual and institutional factors on turnover intent among Taiwanese correctional staff. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology61(1): 100–121.
30.
LambertGPaolineE (2010) Take this job and shove it: an exploratory study of turnover intent among jail staff. Journal of Criminal Justice38: 139–148.
31.
LiY (2016) Correlates of police chief turnover in Texas. Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University, USA.
32.
LiYBrownB (2019) Police chief turnover in Texas: an exploratory analysis of peer evaluation survey data pertinent to police performance and turnover. Police Quarterly22(4): 391–415.
33.
MaguireRKatzC (2002) Community policing, loose coupling, and sensemaking in American police agencies. Justice Quarterly19(3): 503–536.
MastrofskiDRittiR (1996) Police training and the effects of organization on drunk driving enforcement. Justice Quarterly13(2): 291–320.
36.
MastrofskiDUchidaD (1993) Transforming the police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30(3): 330–358.
37.
MastrofskiS (1988) Varieties of police governance in metropolitan America. Politics and Policy8: 12–31.
38.
MatusiakC (2016) Dimensionality of local police chiefs’ institutional sovereigns. Policing and Society26(7): 1–18.
39.
MatusiakC (2019) Environmental predictors of municipal police agency goals. Police Quarterly22(1): 112–136.
40.
MatusiakC (2021) Do new chiefs mean fresh perspective? The institutionalization of the police executive environment. Criminal Justice and Behavior48: 1390–1410.
41.
MatusiakCKingRMaguireR (2016) How perceptions of the institutional environment shape organizational priorities: findings from a survey of police chiefs. Journal of Crime and Justice40(1): 5–19.
42.
MatzKWellsBMinorL, et al. (2012) Predictors of turnover intention among staff in juvenile correctional facilities: the relevance of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice11: 115–131.
43.
MeyerWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
44.
MeyerWScottR (1992) Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
MooreHBragaA (2003) Measuring and improving police performance: the lessons of CompStat and its progeny. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management26: 439–453.
46.
MurdaughT (2005) Succession and the Police Chief: An Examination of the Nature of Turnover among Florida Police Chiefs (No. 32-16630 UMI). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
47.
RainguetWDodgeM (2001) The problems of police chiefs: an examination of the issues in tenure and turnover. Police Quarterly4(3): 268–288.
ScottRMeyerW (1984) Environmental Linkages and Organizational Complexity: Public and Private Schools (Vol. 84). Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, School of Education, Stanford University. Thousands Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
50.
ShadwickT (2020). Turnover at the top: Examining correlates associated with turnover intentions among police chiefs. Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University, USA.
51.
SkolnickHBayleyH (1986) The New Blue Line: Police Innovation in Six American Cities. New York: Free Press.
52.
SmithWWarehamJLambertG (2014) Community and organizational influences on voluntary turnover in law enforcement. Journal of Crime and Justice37: 377–398.
53.
TempelaarDRientiesBNguyenQ (2020) Subjective data, objective data and the role of bias in predictive modelling: lessons from a dispositional learning analytics application. PLoS ONE15(6): e0233977.
TunnellDGainesK (1992) Political pressures and influences on police executives: a descriptive analysis. American Journal of PoliceVI: 1–17.
56.
WarehamJSmithWLambertG (2013) Rates and patterns of law enforcement turnover: a research note. Criminal Justice Policy Review26: 345–370.
57.
WeisbergJKirschenbaumA (1991) Employee turnover intentions: implications from a national sample. The International Journal of Human Resource Management2: 359–375.
58.
WithamCWatsonJ (1983) The role of the law enforcement executive. Journal of Police Science and Administration11: 69–75.
59.
ZhaoJLovrichPRobinsonH (2001) Community policing: is it changing the basic functions of policing?: findings from a longitudinal study of 200+ municipal police agencies. Journal of Criminal Justice29(5): 365–377.
