Research suggests policing is a highly institutionalized field. Limited attention has been paid, however, to the institutionalization of leaders’ views. Assessing turnover in 71 Texas police organizations between October, 2011, and July, 2015, this research evaluates whether there is consistency (i.e., institutional homogenization) after turnover in chiefs’ perceptions of their environments and agency priorities. The research is unique in that it assesses two chiefs’ perceptions that have both led the same law enforcement agency in successive time periods. Assessments of environment and priorities from former chiefs and those replacing them are evaluated utilizing descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate methods. These assessments are also compared with a control group of chiefs from agencies not experiencing turnover. Bivariate results suggest little variation across current and former chiefs, whereas ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models suggest differing relationships across chiefs groups between environmental perceptions and agency priorities. Discussion of the findings is framed by institutional theory.
BayleyD. H. (1994). Police for the future. Oxford University Press.
3.
BidermanA. D.ReissA. J.Jr. (1967). On exploring the “dark figure” of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 374, 1–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1037189
4.
BottomsA.TankebeJ. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102(1), 119–170. https://www.jstor.com/stable/23145787
5.
BrinserK. L.KingW. R. (2016). Organizational permeability to environmental conditions: Local police agency assessments of threats posed by disasters, accidents, and terrorism. Police Quarterly, 19(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611115626409
6.
BurrussG. W.GiblinM. J. (2014). Modeling isomorphism on policing innovation: The role of institutional pressures in adopting community-oriented policing. Crime & Delinquency, 60(3), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128709340225
7.
BurrussG. W.GiblinM. J.SchaferJ. A. (2010). Threatened globally, acting locally: Modeling law enforcement homeland security practices. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902763053
8.
CarterJ. G. (2016). Institutional pressures and isomorphism: The impact on intelligence-led policing adoption. Police Quarterly, 19(4), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611116639536
9.
CrankJ. P. (2003). Institutional theory of police: A review of the state of the art. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510310475723
10.
CrankJ. P.LangworthyR. (1992). An institutional perspective of policing. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83(2), 338–363. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1143860
11.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociology Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://www.jstor.com/stable/2095101
12.
DonaldsonL. (1995). American anti-management theories of organizations: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge University Press.
13.
The Fire and Police Employee Relations Act, Local Government Code: Matters Affecting Public Officers and Employees: Matters Affecting Public Officers and Employees of More than One Type of Local Government § 174 (1993). https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.174.htm
14.
GibbsJ. P.MartinW. T. (1962). Urbanization, technology, and the division of labor: International patterns. American Sociological Review, 27(5), 667–677. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2089624
15.
GiblinM. J.BurrussG. W. (2009). Developing a measurement model of institutional processes in policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 29(4), 643–664. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510910958226
16.
HuntR. G.MagenauJ. M. (1993). Power and the police chief: An institutional and organizational analysis. SAGE.
17.
KadleckC. (2003). Police employee organizations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26(2), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510310475804
MaguireE. R. (2003). Organizational structure in American police agencies: Context, complexity, and control. State University of New York Press.
21.
MaguireE. R. (2014). Police organizations and the iron cage of rationality. In ReisigM. D.KaneR. J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of police and policing (pp. 68–98). Oxford University Press.
22.
MastrofskiS. D.RittiR. R. (2000). Making sense of community policing: A theory-based analysis. Police Practice & Research: An International Journal, 1(2), 183–210.
MatusiakM. C.KingW. R.MaguireE. R. (2017). How perceptions of the institutional environment shape organizational priorities: Findings from a survey of police chiefs. Journal of Crime & Justice, 40(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2016.1155302
26.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://www.jstor.com/stable/2778293
27.
MeyerJ. W.ScottW. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In MeyerJ. W.ScottW. R. (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 199–215). SAGE.
28.
MorabitoM. (2014). American police unions: A hindrance or help to innovation?International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 773–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.934464
29.
MurphyK.TylerT. R. (2017). Experimenting with procedural justice policing. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9300-8
PaolineE. A.IIITerrillW. (2005). The impact of police culture on traffic stop searches: An analysis of attitudes and behaviors. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510510614555
32.
PhillipsJ. R.JiaoA. Y. (2016). Institutional isomorphism and the federal consent decree: The case of the Los Angeles police department. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(4), 756–772. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-11-2015-0132
33.
PhillipsS. W.GayadeenS. M. (2014). The coercive impact of federal grants: COPS grants and the diffusion of the community policing philosophy. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 87(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2014.87.1.656
34.
PowellW. W.ColyvasJ. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.Sahlin-AnderssonK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). SAGE.
35.
ReavesB. A. (2010). Local police departments, 2007 (NCJ 231174). Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
36.
Reuss-IanniE. (1983). Two cultures of policing. Transaction.
37.
SchaferJ. A.VaranoS. P. (2017). Change in police organizations: Perceptions, experiences, and the failure to launch. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(4), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.177/1043986217724532
SmithJ. J. (2019). To adopt or not to adopt: Contextualizing police body-worn cameras through structural contingency and institutional theoretical perspectives. Criminal Justice Review, 44(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016819847267
40.
StinchcombeA. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In MarchJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Rand-McNally.
41.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://www.jstor.com/stable/258788
42.
TodakN.GaubJ. E.WhiteM. D. (2018). The importance of external stakeholders for police body-worn camera diffusion. Policing: An International Journal, 41(4), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-08-2017-0091
43.
Van MaanenJ. (1974). Working the street: A developmental view of police behavior. In JacobH. (Ed.), The potential for reform of criminal justice (pp. 83–130). SAGE.
44.
WalkerS.BumphusV. W. (1992). The effectiveness of civilian review: Observations on recent trends and new issues regarding the civilian review of the police. American Journal of Police, 9(4), 1–16.
45.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE.
46.
WestleyW. A. (1970). Violence and the police: A sociological study of law, custom, and morality. MIT Press.
47.
WilsonJ. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Harvard University Press.
48.
WilsonS.ZhaoJ. S.RenL.BriggsS. (2006). The influence of collective bargaining on large police agency salaries: 1990-2000. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(1), 19–34.
49.
WordenR. E.McLeanS. J. (2017). Research on police legitimacy: The state of the art. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(3), 480–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-05-2017-0062
50.
ZhaoJ.LovrichN. P.RobinsonT. H. (2001). Community policing: Is it changing the basic functions of policing? Findings from a longitudinal study of 200+ municipal police agencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(5), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00102-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
