This article examines the effect crime is having on support for law enforcement in Latin America. Scholars empirically demonstrate a strong negative effect of crime on support for institutions and satisfaction with democracy. Little empirical work, however, investigates the effect of the media on attitudes toward criminal justice institutions within the Latin American context. We test whether variance in crime salience in the media across countries affects support for the police and the criminal justice system. Analyzing survey data from Latinobarometro and content analysis of newspapers in 14 Latin American countries, we find evidence that increased salience of crime reduces trust in the police across a number of different measures of media coverage.
AbneyRAdamsJClarkMEastonMEzrowLKosmidisSNeundorfA (2013) When does valence matter? Heightened valence effects for governing parties during election campaigns. Party Politics19(1): 61–82.
2.
AhmadNHubickeyVMcNamaraIV F (2011) Trust in the National Police. Americas Barometer Insights59: 1–10.
3.
AlbarranAB (2009) Handbook of Spanish Language Media. New York: Routledge.
4.
ArañaA (2005) How the street gangs took Latin America. Foreign Affairs84(2): 98–110.
5.
ArceneauxKJohnsonMLindstadtRVander WielenRJ (2015) The influence of news media on political elites: investigating strategic responsiveness in Congress. The American Journal of Political Science60(1): 5–29.
6.
Blanco ReyesSDíaz RodríguezF (2007) Deficiencias policiales, fiscales o judiciales en la investigación y juzgamiento causantes de impunidad. San Salvador, El Salvador: PNUD.
7.
BoatengFD (2016) Neighborhood-level effects on trust in the police: a multilevel analysis. International Criminal Justice Review26(3): 217–236.
8.
BoothJASeligsonMA (2009) The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BowdenM (2001) Killing Pablo. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
10.
CallananVJRosenbergerJ (2011) Media and public perceptions of the police: examining the impact of race and personal experience. Policing & Society21(2): 167–189.
11.
CaoLZhaoJS (2005) Confidence in the police in Latin America. Journal of Criminal Justice33: 403–412.
12.
CarrerasM (2013) The impact of criminal violence on regime legitimacy in Latin America. Latin American Research Review48: 85–107.
13.
CarminesEGStimsonJA (1989) Issue Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
CeobanuAMWoodCHRibeiroL (2011) Crime victimization and public support for democracy: evidence from Latin America. International Journal of Public Opinion Research23(1): 56–78.
15.
ChangECChuYH (2006) Corruption and trust: exceptionalism in Asian democracies?The Journal of Politics68(2): 259–271.
16.
ChevignyP (2003) The populism of fear. Punishment and Society5: 77–96.
17.
CollinsTACooperCA (2015) Making the cases ‘real’: newspaper coverage of U.S. Supreme Court cases 1953–2004. Political Communication32(1): 23–42.
18.
CruzJM (2015) Police misconduct and political legitimacy in Central America. Journal of Latin American Studies47: 252–283.
19.
CurranJSalovaara-MoringICoenSIyengarS (2009) Crime, foreigners and hard news: a cross-national comparison of reporting and public perception. Journalism11(1): 1–17.
20.
DowlerK (2002) Media influence on citizen attitudes toward police effectiveness. Policing and Society12(3): 227–238.
21.
DowlerK (2003) Media consumption and public attitudes toward crime and justice. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture10(2): 109–126.
22.
Duran-MartinezA (2018) The politics of drug violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
El Peruano (2011a) Ex-ministro se puso a derecho. El Peruano, 14 April.
24.
El Peruano (2011b) Sugieren polemica en el VRE. El Peruano14 April.
25.
El Universal (2009) Mexico enfrenta una amenaza existencial dice Napolitano. El Universal26 March.
26.
FernandezKEKuenziM (2010) Crime and support for democracy in Africa and Latin America. Political Studies58: 450–471.
27.
FruhlingH (2012) A realistic look at community policing in Latin America. Policing and Society22: 76–88.
28.
HernandezA (2010) Los Señores del Narco. Mexico City: Grijalbo.
29.
HesterJBDougallE (2007) The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81: 811–824.
30.
HowittD (1998) Crime, the Media, and the Law. New York: Wiley.
31.
HuhnSOettlerAPeetzP (2006) Exploding crime? Topic management in Central American newspapers. Working paper, German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
32.
IvkovicSK (2008) A comparative study of public support for the police. International Criminal Justice Review18(4): 406–434.
33.
JangHJooHJZhaoJ (2010) Determinants of public confidence in police. Journal of Criminal Justice38: 57–68.
34.
JohnsonSFormanJMBlissK (2012) Police reform in Latin America: Implications for U.S. Policy. Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
35.
KaariainenJT (2007) Trust in the police in 16 European countries: a multilevel analysis. European Journal of Criminology4(4): 409–435.
36.
KrauseK (2013) Supporting the iron fist: the news media and public attitudes toward crime in Latin America. PhD Thesis, University of Notre Dame, US.
37.
KrauseK (2014) Supporting the iron fist: crime news, public opinion, and support for authoritarian crime control in Guatemala. Latin American Politics and Society56(1): 98–119.
38.
KwakDHSan MiguelCECarreonDL (2012) Political legitimacy and public confidence in police: an analysis of attitudes toward Mexican police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management35(1): 124–146.
39.
La Tribuna (2009a) Cadena de asesinatos alarma a transportistas. La Tribuna15 November.
40.
La Tribuna (2009b) Noche Sangrienta: Masacran seis personas en una cancha de futbol. La Tribuna22 November.
41.
LiebertzS (2017) Political elites, crime, and trust in the police in Latin America. International Criminal Justice Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567717747012.
MaloneMFT (2010) The verdict is in: the impact of crime on public trust in Central American justice systems. Journal of Politics in Latin America3: 99–128.
45.
MuggahRAguirre-TobónK (2018) Citizen Security in Latin America: Facts and Figures. Strategic Paper 33. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Igarapé Institute.
46.
MuggahRSzabo de CarvalhoIAlvaradoNMarmolejoLWangR (2016) Making Cities Safer: Citizen Security Innovations from Latin America. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Igarapé Institute.
47.
NorrisP (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
NorrisP (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
RiffeDAustCFLacySR (1993) The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly70: 133–139.
58.
RomeroVMagaloniBDíaz-CayerosA (2014) The Mexican war on drugs: crime and the limits of government persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research26(1): 1–13.
59.
SabetD (2012) Corruption or insecurity? Understanding dissatisfaction with Mexico’s police. Latin American Politics and Society55(1): 22–45.
60.
SchedlerA (2014) The criminal subversion of Mexican democracy. Journal of Democracy25(1): 4–18.
61.
SteenbergenMRJonesBS (2002) Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science46(1): 218–237.
62.
SuretteR (2014) Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice. New York: Cengage.
63.
SwansonK (2013) Zero tolerance in Latin America: punitive paradox in urban policy mobilities. Urban Geography34(7): 972–988.
64.
UngarM (2011) Policing democracy: Overcoming Obstacles to Citizen Security in Latin America (p. 12). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2013) Global Study on Homicide 2013: Trends, Context, Data. Vienna: United Nations.
66.
ValenzuelaSArriagadaA (2011) Politics without citizens? Public opinion, television news, the President, and real-world factors in Chile, 2000–2005. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(3): 357–381.
67.
ViscontiG (2019) Policy preferences after crime victimization: panel and survey evidence from Latin AmericaBritish Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000297.
68.
WantaWGolanGCheolhanL (2004)Agenda setting and international news: media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly81(2): 364–377.
69.
WattJHMazzaMSnyderL (1993) Agenda-setting effects of television news coverage and the memory decay curve. Communication Research20: 408–435.
70.
WazedSAkhtarJ (2015) The divergence of democratic policing: reflection on Brazil and Argentina. Sociology and Anthropology3(7): 361–369.
71.
WeisenhomeierNBenoitK (2009) Presidents, parties, and policy competition. Journal of Politics71(4): 1435–1447.
72.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
