Lathe tool chatter vibration diagnostic using general regression neural network based on Chua’s circuit and fractional-order Lorenz master/slave chaotic system

Abstract

As product quality and production capacity requirements for precision processing become higher, making machine tools smart and improving performance is becoming the trend. In terms of machine tool processing quality, tool wear and chatter vibration are the factors that most directly affect processing quality. Traditionally, operators rely on their experience in determining whether the tool is worn or if there is chatter vibration. However, experience is not quantified data. Experience does not have a uniform judgment standard and can easily lead to wrong judgment. In recent years, many scholars have conducted in-depth studies of the two aforementioned phenomenons. These studies mainly use time and frequency domains to search for phenomenon features as the determination basis. Of time and frequency domain, studies on frequency domain are the most common. However, the frequency domain method requires a large amount of calculation, and the analysis process requires an excessive quantity of data dimensions, making this method unsuitable for real-time analysis. Thus, we propose a general regression neural network analysis method based on Chua’s circuit and a fractional-order Lorenz master/slave composite chaotic system for detecting lathe tool turning chatter vibration in this study. We compared the dynamic error features produced by various fractional-order chaotic systems and chose fractional orders with more obvious feature changes. We then substituted general regression neural network categorization. Compared to the frequency domain analysis method, the method proposed in this study requires fewer data dimensions, fewer calculations, and higher efficiency. Our proposed method also has higher precision and a higher discrimination rate. The result of this study shows that our proposed method has a 100% discrimination rate for determining turning chatter vibration.

Keywords

Fractional-order chaotic system Chua’s circuit Lorenz chaotic system general regression neural network turning chatter vibration

Introduction

As industries have advanced in recent years, machine tools are being widely applied to various fields, and processing quality and efficiency requirements toward precision processing are becoming stricter. This trend has driven the improvement of various machine tools and the move toward making them smarter so that they can meet modern industrial requirements. From a turning processing perspective, lathe tool wear and turning chatter vibration are the main factors that affect processing quality. Of which, turning chatter vibration will directly affect the workpiece’s surface smoothness and processing size error,¹ which can result in loss of processing costs. Turning chatter vibration is instability in high-speed turning.² Traditionally, site operators identify turning chatter vibration based on their experience. However, operators may not have the same experience, so there is no quantified standard for identifying chatter and vibration. Thus, many scholars have begun studying chatter vibration identification methods and finding chatter vibration features as a basis for identification. About the researches of chatter vibration, Aslan and Altintas³ used the currents of motor to detect the chatter dynamics. A large number of studies have been conducted on frequency domain analysis.^4–6 Ishibashi et al.⁷ used fast Fourier transform (FFT) to transform time domain vibration signals into frequency domain patterns. They discovered that when chatter vibration occurs, the high frequency region will have a chatter vibration frequency with very high signal/noise ratio. Lu et al.⁸ transformed time domain vibration signals into a spectrum for analysis and discovered that when chatter vibration occurs, the spindle’s main frequency will migrate to a specific frequency band and the acceleration component will increase significantly. Kakinuma et al.⁹ indicate that when chatter vibration occurs, transformation of the time domain signal with FFT will show that vibration component in the high frequency band increased significantly. All the aforementioned studies on frequency domain chatter vibration identification use a high signal/noise ratio acceleration component in the specific frequency band excited by chatter vibration as the quantification basis for chatter vibration identification. However, the frequency domain analysis method has one disadvantage, which is that it needs to extract a large amount of high dimension time domain signals. This makes calculation more complex. The process requires a large amount of calculation, which affects analysis efficiency, which makes this method unsuitable for real-time analysis.

To solve the aforementioned problem, we used lathe turning chatter vibration as our research topic and proposed a general regression neural network (GRNN) analysis method based on Chua’s circuit and a fractional-order Lorenz master/slave composite chaotic system. In the real physical systems, it do exist fractional order of system dynamics due to the nonlinear effects. In order to describe the nonlinear vibration in CNC to be more accurate, the fractional-order compound master/slave chaotic system is used to convert time domain vibration signals into chaotic dynamic error distribution patterns as a feature for identifying the current processing status. This feature is substituted into the GRNN for learning and categorization. The results of this study show that our proposed method can significantly increase calculation efficiency by using signal extraction with fewer dimensions and that our proposed method has a discrimination rate of 100%. Thus, this method is extremely useful for analyzing chatter vibration in machine tools.

Theoretical framework

Nonlinear Chua’s circuit

Chua’s circuit¹⁰ is a nonlinear circuit proposed by Professor Chua in 1983 that is made up of four types of linear components, such as the inductor (L), resistor (R), capacitor ( $C_{1}, C_{2}$ ), and the nonlinear Chua’s diode ( $N_{r}$ ). Figure 1 is an illustration of Chua’s circuit. Equation (1) is the Kirchhoff’s law dynamic equation for Chua’s circuit¹¹

{\begin{cases} \frac{d V_{C 1}}{d t} = \frac{1}{C_{1}} [\frac{1}{R} (V_{2} - V_{1}) - f (V_{1})] \\ \frac{d V_{c 2}}{d t} = \frac{1}{C_{1}} [\frac{1}{R} (V_{1} - V_{2}) + I_{3}] \\ \frac{d I_{3}}{d t} = \frac{1}{L} V_{2} \end{cases}}

(1)

Figure 1.

Chua’s circuit.

In equation (1), $V_{1}, V_{2}$ are the two end voltages of the capacitor and $I_{3}$ is the current that flows through the inductor. $f (V_{1})$ is the nonlinear resistor $N_{r}$ . We used Chua’s circuit to convert the time domain vibration signal into a nonlinear form and then substituted a fractional-order Lorenz master/slave chaotic system for analysis. The fractional-order Lorenz master/slave chaotic system is introduced in detail in the next section.

Fractional-order Lorenz master/slave chaotic system

Chaos theory is a nonlinear system theory that is extremely sensitive to minute changes in input. The chaotic synchronization system can be divided into the master system (MS) and the slave system (SS), which is shown as equations (2) and (3), respectively

X^{'} = A X + f (X)

(2)

Y^{'} = A Y + f (Y) + U

(3)

In the aforementioned two equations, X and Y are the status vectors, A is the $M \times N$ matrix, $f (x), f (y)$ are the nonlinear vectors, and U is the nonlinear control item. To realize the dynamic error changes freely tracked by the MS/SS, we set U as 0. When the MS/SS receives the signal, the MS/SS will implement subtraction to produce the dynamic error. The Lorenz master/slave chaotic system¹² was proposed by Edward Norton Lorenz in 1936. The dynamic equation is shown in equation (4) and the motion track figure is shown in Figure 2

{\begin{array}{l} \frac{d x_{m} (t)}{d t} = α (y_{m} (t) - x_{m} (t)) \\ \frac{d y_{m} (t)}{d t} = β x_{m} (t) - y_{m} (t) - x_{m} (t) \cdot z_{m} (t) \\ \frac{d z_{m} (t)}{d t} = x_{m} (t) \cdot y_{m} (t) - γ z_{m} (t) \end{array}

(4)

{\begin{array}{l} \frac{d x_{s} (t)}{d t} = α (y_{s} (t) - x_{s} (t)) \\ \frac{d y_{s} (t)}{d t} = β x_{s} (t) - y_{s} (t) - x_{s} (t) \cdot z_{s} (t) \\ \frac{d z_{s} (t)}{d t} = x_{s} (t) \cdot y_{s} (t) - γ z_{s} (t) \end{array}

(5)

Figure 2.

Lorenz chaotic system motion track.

Based on the study results of Yau et al.,¹³ where the dynamic errors are defined as $\dot{e_{1}} = \frac{d x_{m} (t)}{d t} - \frac{d x_{s} (t)}{d t}, \dot{e_{2}} = \frac{{dy}_{m} (t)}{dt} - \frac{{dy}_{s} (t)}{dt}, \dot{e_{3}} = \frac{d z_{m} (t)}{d t} - \frac{d z_{s} (t)}{d t}$ , and $e = [e_{1}, e_{2}, e_{3}]$ , we used the dynamic error distribution produced by the Lorenz chaotic system as the determination feature. The chaotic system dynamic error status can be shown as equation (6)

[\begin{matrix} \dot{e_{1}} \\ \dot{e_{2}} \\ \dot{e_{3}} \end{matrix}] = [\begin{matrix} - α & α & 0 \\ β & - 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & - γ \end{matrix}] [\begin{matrix} e_{1} \\ e_{2} \\ e_{3} \end{matrix}] + [\begin{matrix} 0 \\ - e_{1} e_{3} \\ e_{1} e_{3} \end{matrix}] = [A] \tilde{e} + [\begin{matrix} 0 \\ - e_{1} e_{3} \\ e_{1} e_{3} \end{matrix}]

(6)

In equation (6), when the Lorenz chaotic system parameters $α, β, γ$ are 28, 10, and 2.66, respectively, the chaotic system is guaranteed to produce chaotic attractors. This attractor is used to produce chaotic dynamic errors. To make the Lorenz master/slave chaotic system output more nonlinear, we used the fractional-order differential theory proposed by Miller¹⁴ and Ma and Hori.¹⁵ The dynamic error e of this theory is similar to equation (7)

[\begin{matrix} e r r o r_{1} [i] \\ e r r o r_{2} [i] \\ e r r o r_{3} [i] \end{matrix}] = [\begin{matrix} - α^{'} & α^{'} & 0 \\ β^{'} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - γ^{'} \end{matrix}] [\begin{matrix} e_{1} {[i]}^{1 + p} \\ e_{2} {[i]}^{1 + p} \\ e_{3} {[i]}^{1 + p} \end{matrix}] + [\begin{matrix} \frac{(1) e_{1} {[i]}^{p}}{(1 + p)} \\ \frac{(1) e_{1} [i] e_{3} [i] {(e_{2} [i])}^{p}}{(1 + p)} \\ \frac{(1) e_{1} [i] e_{2} [i] {(e_{3} [i])}^{p}}{(1 + p)} \end{matrix}]

(7)

GRNN

The probabilistic neural network was proposed by Specht¹⁶ in 1991. This model is based on the probability model¹⁷ and is mainly applied to high-dimensional mapping and nonlinear prediction.¹⁸ The GRNN is composed of the input layer, pattern layer, summation layer, and the output layer.^19–21 Using pattern layer Gaussian function operation we can create output that is near nonlinear. The GRNN framework is shown in Figure 3. The output layer correlation equation is as shown in equation (8)

Y_{i} = \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} y_{i} e x p (\frac{- D_{i}^{2}}{2 σ^{2}})}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} e x p (\frac{- D_{i}^{2}}{2 σ^{2}})}

(8)

Figure 3.

GRNN framework.

Of which

D_{i}^{2} = {(X_{i j} - X_{j i})}^{T} (X_{i j} - X_{j i})

(9)

In equation (8), $σ$ is the smoothing parameter, which in the GRNN model is a parameter that can be obtained through training. We used particle swarm optimization (PSO)^22,23 to search for the optimal parameter. In the future, an analytical method such as variational principle²⁴ could also be applied to analyze it.

Experiment framework

Time domain and frequency domain signal analysis

In this study we used the MC4200BL digitally controlled sphere CNC lathe produced by Mike Machine Industry. The 66212APZ1 uniaxial accelerometer was used for the spindle acceleration signal during turning processing. Figures 4 and 5 show the MC4200BL digitally controlled sphere CNC lathe and the 66212APZ1 uniaxial accelerometer, respectively.

Figure 4.

MC4200BL digitally controlled sphere CNC lathe.

Figure 5.

66212APZ1 uniaxial accelerometer.

We used the 66212APZ1 uniaxial accelerometer to extract the spindle acceleration signal during turning processing. The turning acceleration signal is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Turning acceleration signal.

In this study we mainly analyzed the spindle idle acceleration signal, the steady turning acceleration signal, and the chatter vibration turning acceleration signal during turning processing. The framework diagram of this scheme is shown in Figure 7. In Figure 8, (a) is the idle acceleration signal, (b) is the steady turning acceleration signal, and (c) is the chatter vibration turning acceleration signal. All the setting parameters are shown in Table 1.

Figure 7.

System framework diagram. MS: master system; SS: slave system.

Figure 8.

Acceleration signal of various status. (a) Idel, (b) Normal cutting, (c) Chattering.

Table 1.

Setting parameters.

Cutting tool	Mitsubishi tungsten carbide turning insert
Feed rate (mm/rev)	0.2
Spindle speed (r/min)	1800
Stable cutting thickness (mm)	1
Chatter cutting thickness (mm)	4
Workpiece size (mm×mm)	S45C 30 × 175

The time domain signal’s (a), (b), and (c) segment was transformed into frequency domain signals using FFT, as shown in Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Turning acceleration frequency domain signal. (a) Idle acceleration frequency domain signal, (b) steady turning acceleration frequency domain signal, and (c) chatter vibration turning acceleration frequency domain signal.

When the cutting depth reaches 4 mm, the cutting force will be too large to cause chattering behavior due to the depth of cutting being too deep. Figure 9(c) shows that when turning chatter vibration occurs, the 2.333 kHz chatter vibration frequency will excite a signal with a higher signal/noise ratio and component. This result completely conforms to the phenomenon proposed by Ishibashi et al.,⁷ Lu et al.,⁸ and Kakinuma et al.⁹ This proves that the interval acceleration signal in Figure 9(c) is the chatter vibration turning acceleration signal.

Fractional-order compound master/slave chaotic system analysis

We used a fractional-order compound master/slave chaotic system that combines a nonlinear Chua’s circuit and fractional-order Lorenz master/slave chaotic system as our primary signal analysis tool. By substituting the time domain acceleration signal into the nonlinear Chua’s circuit for the first nonlinear process, then substituting the nonlinear signal into each fractional-order Lorenz master/slave chaotic system to calculate the master/slave chaotic dynamic error, we can then compare the master/slave chaotic dynamic error of each fractional order and choose the fractional order with the greatest change. This order is used as the fractional-order Lorenz master/slave chaotic system parameter. The order’s dynamic error is used as the feature basis for the signal analysis. Figures 10 to 19 show the compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution from noninteger order 0.1 to integer order 1. Generally, when chatter vibration occurs, the Error 2 and Error 3 component of the dynamic error distribution status is several times larger and more distributed than that of the other two status types. This phenomenon can be used as the standard for identifying chatter vibration. The dynamic error distribution of the noninteger order 0.1 is also more nonlinear when compared to that of other orders. Thus, we chose the compound chaotic system of noninteger order 0.1 for subsequent analysis and substituted the analysis result into GRNN for later GRNN categorization.

Figure 10.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.1. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning

Figure 11.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.2. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

Figure 12.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.3. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

Figure 13.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.4. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

Figure 14.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.5. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

Figure 15.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.6. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

Figure 16.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.7. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

Figure 17.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.8. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

Figure 18.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of noninteger order 0.9. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

Figure 19.

Compound chaotic system dynamic error distribution of integer order 1. (a) Idle, (b) steady turning, and (c) chatter vibration turning.

GRNN categories

In this study, we used the GRNN as the postsignal analysis smart categorization tool. Error 2 component from the aforementioned noninteger order 0.1 compound chaotic dynamic error was substituted into GRNN. PSO was used to train the optimal smoothing parameter. Figure 20 shows the GRNN training result.

Figure 20.

GRNN training result.

Figure 20 shows that on the 75th PSO iteration, the error converged to the global optimal solution. That is, the $σ$ value that corresponds to the iteration number is the optimal smoothing parameter value. After we obtained the optimal smoothing parameter, we substituted the Error 2 component of from the idle, steady turning, and chatter vibration turning state into the GRNN categorization. Values between 0 and 1 were outputted according to weight. A value of 1 means that it conforms to the status. A value of 0 means that it does not conform to the status. GRNN categorization results are shown in Table 2. The actual cutting workpieces are shown in Figures 21 and 22. It can be observed that the surface of the workpiece is smooth during stable steady-state turning. When the chattering phenomenon occurs, the surface of the workpiece will produce uneven texture. It will induce the poor processing quality.

Figure 21.

The turning surface of steady state.

Figure 22.

The turning surface of chattering state.

Table 2.

GRNN categorization result.

Sample	Turning chatter	Stable turning	Idle
Spindle on dynamic error 2	0	0	1
Stable turning dynamic error 2	0	1	0
Turning chatter dynamic error 2	1	0	0

GRNN: general regression neural network.

We used a fractional-order compound master/slave chaotic system for analysis and used GRNN for categorization. The above table 2 shows that after the categorization result substituted the idle signal into the GRNN, the idle item was 1, the steady turning signal was 1, and the chatter vibration turning signal was 1. This indicates that the process can accurately categorize idle, steady turning, and chatter vibration turning. Table 1 shows that the categorization accuracy reached 100%. This proves that the method proposed in this study is feasible and can be used to great effect on identifying chatter vibration.

Conclusion

In this study we used a lathe machine tool as the basis to study turning chatter vibration. By comparing the dynamic errors produced by different fractional-order compound master/slave chaotic systems, we were able to extract an order with more obvious change. The dynamic error of this order was then used as the feature for identifying chatter vibration. GRNN was then used to smartly and effectively categorize the feature. Compared to traditional frequency domain analysis methods, the method proposed in this study extracts less data and requires fewer calculations. Thus, under the premise of not affecting accuracy, the calculation efficiency can be significantly increased. This study is the first to use compound fractional-order master/slave chaotic system combined with GRNN to analyze chatter vibration. This very novel method has been verified by this study to have 100% discrimination. This means that the method proposed in this study is very practical. Because this method has simpler operation and superior calculation efficiency, it can be integrated into embedded systems. Portable chatter vibration diagnostic devices can be developed to make application of smart analysis and categorization system proposed by this study more convenient.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/ or publication of this article: The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, for financial support of this project under Contract No. MOST 104-2221-E-167-001 and MOST104-2622-E-167-019-CC3.

References

Totis

Sortino

Robust analysis of stability in internal turning. Procedia Eng 2014; 69: 1306–1315.

van de Wouw

van Dijk

NJM

Nijmeijer

Pyragas-type feedback control for chatter mitigation in high-speed milling. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015; 48: 334–339.

Aslan

Altintas

On-line chatter detection in milling using drive motor current commands extracted from CNC. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2018; 132: 64–80.

Cao

Chatter stability of milling with speed-varying dynamics of spindles. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2012; 52: 50–58.

Munoa

Beudaert

Dombovari

, et al. Chatter suppression techniques in metal cutting. CIRP Ann 2016; 65: 785–808.

Grossi

Scippa

Sallese

, et al. On the generation of chatter marks in peripheral milling: a spectral interpretation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2018; 133: 31–46.

Ishibashi

Fujimoto

Ishii

, et al. High-frequency-variation speed control of spindle motor for chatter vibration suppression in NC machine tools. In: 2014 American control conference, 2014, pp.2172–2177.

Lian

, et al. Model-based chatter stability prediction and detection for the turning of a flexible workpiece. Mech Syst Signal Process 2018; 100: 814–826.

Kakinuma

Sudo

Aoyama

Detection of chatter vibration in end milling applying disturbance observer. CIRP Ann 2011; 60: 109–112.

10.

Jha

Das

Abhinav

Effects of electromagnetic interference on non-autonomous chaotic circuits. In: 2009 4th international conference on computers and devices for communication (CODEC), 2009, pp.1–4.

11.

Kennedy

MP.

Three steps to chaos. II. A Chua’s circuit primer. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I 1993; 40: 657–674.

12.

Sun

Wang

Dynamics of the fractional-order Lorenz system based on Adomian decomposition method and its DSP implementation. IEEE/CAA J Automat Sin 2018; 1–6.

13.

Yau

Chen

, et al. Fractional-order chaotic self-synchronization-based tracking faults diagnosis of ball bearing systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2016; 63: 3824–3833.

14.

Miller

KS.

An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations. In: B

Ross

(ed.) An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations. New York: Wiley, 1993, pp.102–112.

15.

Hori

Fractional-order control: theory and applications in motion control [past and present]. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 2007; 1: 6–16.

16.

Specht

DF.

Probabilistic neural networks. Neural Netw 1990; 3: 109–118.

17.

Ghritlahre

Prasad

RK.

Investigation of thermal performance of unidirectional flow porous bed solar air heater using MLP, GRNN, and RBF models of ANN technique. Therm Sci Eng Prog 2018; 6: 226–235.

18.

Specht

DF.

A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1991; 2: 568–576.

19.

Bendu

Deepak

BBVL

Murugan

Application of GRNN for the prediction of performance and exhaust emissions in HCCI engine using ethanol. Energy Convers Manag 2016; 122: 165–173.

20.

Ghritlahre

Prasad

RK.

Exergetic performance prediction of solar air heater using MLP, GRNN and RBF models of artificial neural network technique. J Environ Manag 2018; 223: 566–575.

21.

Majumder

Maity

Prediction and optimization of surface roughness and micro-hardness using grnn and MOORA-fuzzy-a MCDM approach for nitinol in WEDM. Measurement 2018; 118: 1–13.

22.

C-B

Tian

A-H

Y-C

, et al. Active controller design for precision computerized numerical control machine tool systems. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control 2018. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/1461348418797239.

23.

Kennedy

Eberhart

Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95 – international conference on neural networks, 1995, Vol. 4, pp.1942–1948.

24.

A remark on Samuelson’s variational principle in economics. Appl Math Lett 2018; 84: 143–147.