Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Dynamic vibration absorber is an ideal device for vibration control at specific frequencies. In order to get a robust vibration control performance, multiple or distributed dynamic vibration absorbers are usually used for suppressing vibrations in plate structures. Optimization methods for the single dynamic vibration absorber in various vibration systems had been proposed many years ago. However, the analytical optimization solutions with respect to the distributed dynamic vibration absorbers for the plate structures have not been found. In this paper, the optimization problems of the distributed dynamic vibration absorbers for suppressing vibrations in plates are studied. Vibration equations of the plate carrying distributed dynamic vibration absorbers are established using modal superposition method. The similarities of vibration shapes of the dynamic vibration absorbers and mode shapes of the plate are revealed. According to the characteristics of the vibration shapes of dynamic vibration absorbers, the vibration equations of the plate carrying distributed dynamic vibration absorbers are transformed into a form of equations of a two degree of freedom system. The analytical optimization formulas of the distributed dynamic vibration absorbers for suppressing vibrations in plates are derived by applying the fixed-points theory. The effectiveness of the optimization formulas is verified through numerical simulations. The simulation results also show that a brilliant multi-mode vibration control can be realized by using the optimized distributed dynamic vibration absorbers.

Keywords

Optimization distributed dynamic vibration absorbers vibration suppression plates fixed-points theory

Introduction

The dynamic vibration absorber (DVA) originally invented by Frahm¹ a century ago is an ideal device for vibration control at specific frequencies. Because of its simplicity, reliability and efficiency, the DVA is widely used to reduce the noise and vibration of rail vehicles, aircraft cabins and many other structures.^2,3 The vibration suppression performance of the DVA is sensitive to the variations of the vibration characteristics of the host structures. Thus, even a slight deviation from the parameter setting can result in a significant decrease in the vibration reduction performance when a single DVA is used. Therefore, adaptive DVAs and multiple DVAs are usually used to overcome the disadvantages aforementioned.^4,5 Gardonio and Zilletti⁶ and Zilletti and Gardonio⁷ studied the vibration control characteristics of the switching and sweeping tuneable DVAs. Through the appropriately adjustment, the broadband vibration control can be realized using the tuneable DVAs. Acar and Yilmaz⁸ designed an adaptive DVA with negative stiffness, wherein the negative stiffness element reduced the adaptation effort without sacrificing the speed of the tuning. Multiple passive DVAs are usually used to reduce the vibrations in continuous structures. The multi-frequency impact vibration and noise of the floor are reduced effectively by using the multiple DVAs in the work of Hwang et al.⁹ Brennan and his co-workers¹⁰ studied the effect of distributed DVAs on the transmission efficiency of bending wave in the beams. Thompson studied¹¹ the effects of continuous distributed DVAs on the reduction of broad-band wave propagation in beams and pointed out the general method for widening the vibration reduction bandwidth. Continuous distributed DVAs are used to control the broad-band wave propagation in beams in the work of Thompson,¹¹ wherein the general method for extending the vibration reduction bandwidth is proposed. Researchers pointed out that the multiple DVAs are more effective than the single DVA in achieving the robust, broadband and large scale vibration suppressions.^12–14

Whether the goal of utilizing DVAs is to reduce the vibrations at specific frequencies or is to reduce the vibrations in a frequency band, the DVAs need to be optimized to get the best vibration reduction effect. Optimization problems of the DVA used for the vibration reduction of single DOF systems had already been perfectly solved. The dynamic problems of the single DOF systems carrying a DVA were originally studied by Ormondroy and Denhartog.¹⁵ The fixed-points theory proposed by Denhartog is the most classical and effective optimization method. Another classical H2 optimization method for the DVA used for the vibration control of single DOF systems was proposed in the research work of Crandall and Mark.¹⁶ In 2002, Asami et al.¹⁷ proposed the analytical formulas to the H2 and H∞ optimization of the DVA attached to a damped linear system. Shen et al.¹⁸ found that the fixed-pints theory is also applicable to the DVA with negative stiffness. Through the analytical studies, they proposed the analytical solutions of the frequency ratio, damping ratio and negative stiffness ratio of the DVA.

There are also abundant researches studying the optimization methods of the single DVA used for the vibration reduction of continuous structures. Jacquot¹⁹ studied the effect of the DVA on the vibration suppression of the plate subjected to random excitation and proposed the transfer function which is used to predict the vibration reduction performance and optimized the parameters of the DVA. The suppression of random vibrations of a plate using a DVA was studied in the work of Jacquot,¹⁹ wherein he derived the transfer function which can be used to predict the vibration reduction performance and optimize the parameters of the DVA. Cheung and Wong²⁰ proposed the analytical formulas of the H∞ and H2 optimization method of the single DVA used to suppress vibrations in plates. With the application of the fixed-points theory, Dayou²¹ proposed the concise optimal tuning formulas of the single DVA for low-frequency vibration reductions of beam structures.

However, there are very few concise and easy-to-use optimization method for the vibration reduction of continuous structures using multiple or distributed DVAs. Based on the dynamic stiffness element method of beam structures, Chen and Huang²² proposed an optimal tune method for the multiple DVAs to achieve the optimal vibration control of the fundamental mode of a beam. Considering the complexity of the vibration systems consisted of continuous structures carrying multiple DVAs, researchers usually solve this optimization problem by utilizing optimization algorithms such as linear quadratic regulator-based optimization method and genetic algorithm.^23–25 The studies in this paper aim to explore out a concise optimization method of distributed DVAs for suppressing vibrations in plate structures.

This paper is organized as follows. Equations of motions of the plate carrying distributed DVAs are given in the next section. Then, the vibration characteristics of the distributed DVAs are analysed. In the subsequent section, the analytical optimization formulas of the distributed DVAs are derived. Then it is followed by a section where the effectiveness of the optimization formulas is verified through numerical simulations, and also, the optimal locations and the optimal amounts of the DVAs are revealed. Finally, several conclusions are drawn in the last section.

Equations of motions

As shown in Figure 1, a thin rectangular plate on the rectangular domain $0 \leq x \leq a$ and $0 \leq y \leq b$ carries M DVAs. The plate is subject to a point force $f_{0} (t)$ at $(x_{0}, y_{0})$ . The equation of motion of the plate can be written as

D \nabla^{4} w (x, y, t) + ρ h \frac{\partial^{2} w (x, y, t)}{\partial t^{2}} = f_{0} (t) δ (x - x_{0}) δ (y - y_{0}) - \sum_{n = 1}^{M} f_{n} (t) δ (x - x_{n}) δ (y - y_{n})

(1)where

w (x, y, t)

is the flexural vibration displacement of the plate,

ρ

is the density,

h

is the thickness,

D

is the flexural rigidity. The constraint force of the nth DVA at the absorber location

(x_{n}, y_{n})

f_{n} (t)

which can be expressed as

f_{n} (t) = k_{n} [w (x_{n}, y_{n}, t) - z_{n} (t)] + c_{n} [\frac{\partial w (x_{n}, y_{n}, t)}{\partial t} - \frac{\partial z_{n} (t)}{\partial t}]

(2)where

k_{n}

c_{n}

and

z_{n} (t)

are the spring constant, dashpot damping and vibration displacement of the nth DVA, respectively. The equation of motion of the nth DVA is

m_{n} \frac{\partial^{2} z_{n} (t)}{\partial t^{2}} = f_{n} (t)

(3)where

m_{n}

is the mass of the nth DVA.

Figure 1.

A rectangular plate carrying DVAs. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

Using modal expansion method, the vibration displacement of the plate can be approximated by a J term modal series

w (x, y, t) = \sum_{j = 1}^{J} φ_{j} (x, y) w_{j} (t) = {[ϕ (x, y)]}^{T} {w (t)}

(4)where

[ϕ (x, y)] = {[φ_{1} (x, y), φ_{2} (x, y), \dots, φ_{J} (x, y)]}^{T}

(5)

{w (t)} = {W_{1}, W_{2}, \dots, w_{J}}^{T} e^{j ω t} = {W}^{T} e^{j ω t}

(6)where

φ_{j} (x, y)

and

w_{j} (t)

are the mode shape function and vibration displacement of the jth mode of the plate, respectively.

Substitution of equation (4) into equation (1) and the use of the modal orthonormal conditions lead to the differential equations of the vibration system of the plate carrying DVAs

[M] {\ddot{q} (t)} + [D] {\dot{q} (t)} + [K] {q (t)} = {P} f_{0} (t)

(7)where the vibration displacement vector can be expressed as

{q (t)} = (\begin{matrix} {w (t)} \\ {z (t)} \end{matrix})

(8)with the vibration displacement vector of the DVAs

{z (t)} = {Z_{1}, Z_{2}, \dots, Z_{M}}^{T} e^{j ω t} = {Z}^{T} e^{j ω t}

(9)

${P}$ is the space distribution vector of the external force on the plate which can be expressed as

{P} = (\begin{matrix} {P_{f}} \\ {0}_{M} \end{matrix})

(10)where

{P_{f}} = \int_{s} [ϕ (x, y)] δ (x - x_{0}) δ (y - y_{0}) d x d y

(11)

${0}_{M}$ is a zero vector of M order. The mass, damping and stiffness matrices in equation (7) are given by

[M] = [\begin{matrix} [M_{p}] & 0 \\ 0 & [M_{r}] \end{matrix}]

(12)

[K] = [\begin{matrix} [K_{p}] + [K_{r}] & - [K_{p r}] \\ - [K_{r p}] & [K_{r r}] \end{matrix}]

(13)

[D] = [\begin{matrix} [D_{r}] & - [D_{p r}] \\ - [D_{r p}] & [D_{r r}] \end{matrix}]

(14)where

[M_{p}] = \underset{1 \leq j \leq J}{d i a g} {M_{j}}, [M_{r}] = \underset{1 \leq n \leq M}{d i a g} {m_{n}}

[K_{p}] = \underset{1 \leq j \leq J}{d i a g} {K_{j}} = \underset{1 \leq j \leq J}{d i a g} {_{β j}^{2} M_{j}}

[K_{r r}] = \underset{1 \leq n \leq M}{d i a g} {k_{n}}, [K_{r}] = \sum_{n = 1}^{M} k_{n} [ϕ (x_{n}, y_{n})] {[ϕ (x_{n}, y_{n})]}^{T}

[K_{p r}] = {[K_{r p}]}^{T} = [k_{1} [ϕ (x_{1}, y_{1})], k_{2} [ϕ (x_{2}, y_{2})], \dots, k_{M} [ϕ (x_{M}, y_{M})]]

[D_{r r}] = \underset{1 \leq n \leq M}{d i a g} {c_{n}}, [D_{r}] = \sum_{n = 1}^{M} c_{n} [ϕ (x_{n}, y_{n})] {[ϕ (x_{n}, y_{n})]}^{T}

[D_{p r}] = {[D_{r p}]}^{T} = [c_{1} [ϕ (x_{1}, y_{1})], c_{2} [ϕ (x_{2}, y_{2})], \dots, c_{M} [ϕ (x_{M}, y_{M})]]

where

M_{j}

and

β_{j}

are the modal mass and the angular modal frequency of the jth mode of the plate without DVAs.

The eigenvalue problem of the $J + M$ DOF vibration system in equation (7) is defined as

(λ_{i}^{2} [M] + λ_{i} [D] + [K]) {u_{i}} = 0

(15)where

λ_{i}

and

{u_{i}}

are the ith eigenvalue and its corresponding eigenvector. The eigenvector has two parts as

{u_{i}} = {\begin{matrix} {u_{p,} i_{}} \\ {u_{r, i}} \end{matrix}}

(16)where

{u_{p,} i_{}}

describes the relation of the J modal displacements of the plate,

{u_{r,} i_{}}

describes the ith mode shape of the M DVAs.

With the attachment of the DVAs, the ith mode shape function of the plate is

ψ_{i} (x, y) = {[ϕ (x, y)]}^{T} {u_{p,} i_{}}

(17)

Under the harmonic motion supposition, the vibration amplitude of the M DVAs and the J modal displacements of the plate can be calculated by equation (7)

{Q} = {(- ω^{2} [M] + j ω [D] + [K])}^{- 1} {P} f_{0}

(18)where

{Q} = {\begin{matrix} {W}_{J} \\ {Z}_{M} \end{matrix}}

(19)

Finally, the frequency response of the plate can be obtained

w (x, y, t) = {[ϕ (x, y)]}^{T} {W} e^{j ω t}

(20)

Vibration characteristics of the DVAs

In the low-frequency range where the natural frequencies of the plate are well separated, the vibration of the plate during a certain frequency band is dominated by the nearby single vibration mode. This single vibration mode can be set as the target vibration mode to optimize the DVAs to achieve the vibration control in this certain frequency band. The vibration characteristics of the distributed DVAs are numerically studied in this section to afford the theoretical basis for the optimization.

M DVAs are equally distributed on the plate surface with $r_{a}$ rows and $r_{b}$ columns. The distances between each row and column are $a / (r_{a} + 1)$ and $b / (r_{b} + 1)$ , respectively. All DVAs are identical and each has a mass $m_{o}$ , resonant frequency $ω_{o}$ and damping ratio $ξ_{o}$ . The mass ratio of the all DVAs to the plate is set to 1% since the maximum mass ratio is usually no more than 10% in practice.

The parameters of the plate and DVAs in numerical calculations are shown in Table 1. All edges of the plate are simply supported and the resonant frequency of each DVA is tune to the modal frequencies of the plate. Under the condition that all edges of the plate are simply supported, the mode shape function is given by

φ_{j} (x, y) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{a b}} \sin (\frac{j_{x} π x}{a}) \sin (\frac{j_{y} π y}{b})

(21)

Table 1.

Parameters of the plate and DVAs in calculations.

Par.	Value	Unit	Par.	Value	Unit	Par.	Value	Unit
a	0.6	(m)	$ρ$	2700	(kg/m³)	$J$	$4 \times 4$	(–)
$b$	0.6	(m)	$E$	70	(GPa)	$r_{a}$	9	(–)
$h$	0.004	(m)	v	0.34	(–)	$r_{b}$	9	(–)
$x_{p}$	0.24	(–)	$y_{p}$	0.16	(–)	$ξ_{o}$	0	(–)
$x_{0}$	0.13	(–)	$y_{0}$	0.13	(–)	$m_{o}$	$0.01 ρ a b h / r_{a} r_{b}$	(kg)

DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

From equation (20), the frequency response of the plate at the position $(x_{p}, y_{p})$ is calculated and is shown in Figure 2. The force excitation point and the vibration response collecting point are set at the specific position on the plate to avoid locating at the zero vibration nodes. In Figure 2, the vibration response of the bare plate is plotted as the solid line. The first three natural frequencies of the plate are 54.5 Hz, 136.5 Hz and 218 Hz, respectively. The break line, dash dot line and the dotted line represent the working frequency of the DVAs are set to the first, second and the third natural frequencies of the plate, respectively. Because the natural frequencies of the plate are well separated, the DVAs performed a brilliant vibration absorption effect during the frequency band near the target vibration mode while they are almost useless on the other vibration modes.

Figure 2.

Vibration response of the plate: ––bare plate, - - - DVAs are tuned to 54.5 Hz, -·-DVAs are tuned to 136.5 Hz, ........... DVAs are tuned to 218 Hz. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

Due to the introduction of the distributed DVAs, the vibration peaks on the targeted mode of the plate are “absorbed,” while the two new vibration peaks emerged on both sides of the original peak. The optimization of the DVAs is to suppress the vibrations of the plate on the two new vibration peaks. So, the vibration characteristics of the DVAs at the new emerged vibration peaks are needed to be studied.

The working frequencies of the DVAs are set to the first three natural frequencies of the bare plate and the vibration shapes of the DVAs are calculated through equation (16). The vibration shapes of the DVAs are plotted in Figures 3 to 5, respectively. In order to analyse the relationship between the mode shapes of the plate and the vibration shapes of the DVAs, the plate’s mode shapes represented by the DVA attaching points on the plate are also plotted in each figure. Since the mass ratio of DVAs is not more than 10%, the vibration mode shapes of the plate have nearly no change. As a result, the new resonant modes have the same shapes with the original modes of the bare plate. In fact, the part (b) and (c) in Figures 3 to 5 depict the vibration displacement of all the DVAs which are marked as black nodes. It is interesting that the vibration shapes of the DVAs represented by those black nodes are same with the mode shapes of the plate.

Figure 3.

Vibration shapes of the plate and DVAs: (a) the first mode shape of the plate, (b) the vibration shape of the DVAs at 52 Hz, and (c) the vibration shape of the DVAs at 56 Hz. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

Figure 4.

Vibration shapes of the plate and DVAs: (a) the second mode shape of the plate, (b) the vibration shape of the DVAs at 129 Hz, and (c) the vibration shape of the DVAs at 144 Hz.

Figure 5.

Vibration shapes of the plate and DVAs: (a) the third mode shape of the plate, (b) the vibration shape of the DVAs at 206 Hz, and (c) the vibration shape of the DVAs at 231 Hz. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

Optimizations of the distributed DVAs

The jth mode of the plate is considered as the vibration control target. Under the assumption that the vibration of the plate is dominated by the jth mode, equation (7) can be reduced to

- ω^{2} [M_{j M}] {\begin{matrix} W_{j} \\ {Z} \end{matrix}} + j ω [D_{j M}] {\begin{matrix} W_{j} \\ {Z} \end{matrix}} + [K_{j M}] {\begin{matrix} W_{j} \\ {Z} \end{matrix}} = {\begin{matrix} f_{0} φ_{j} (x_{0}, y_{0}) \\ {0}_{M} \end{matrix}}

(22)where

\begin{array}{l} [M_{j M}] = [\begin{matrix} M_{j} \\ m_{1} \\ ⋱ \\ m_{M} \end{matrix}] \\ [D_{j M}] = [\begin{matrix} \sum_{n = 1}^{M} c_{n} φ_{j}^{2} (x_{n}, y_{n}) & c_{1} φ_{j} (x_{1}, y_{1}) & \dots & c_{M} φ_{j} (x_{M}, y_{M}) \\ c_{1} φ_{j} (x_{1}, y_{1}) & c_{1} & 0 & 0 \\ ⋮ & 0 & ⋱ & 0 \\ c_{M} φ_{j} (x_{M}, y_{M}) & 0 & 0 & c_{M} \end{matrix}] \\ [K_{j M}] = [\begin{matrix} K_{1} + \sum_{n = 1}^{M} k_{n} φ_{j}^{2} (x_{n}, y_{n}) & k_{1} φ_{j} (x_{1}, y_{1}) & \dots & k_{M} φ_{j} (x_{M}, y_{M}) \\ k_{1} φ_{j} (x_{1}, y_{1}) & k_{1} & 0 & 0 \\ ⋮ & 0 & ⋱ & 0 \\ k_{M} φ_{j} (x_{M}, y_{M}) & 0 & 0 & k_{M} \end{matrix}] \end{array}

Based on the vibration characteristics of the DVAs, the amplitude of the vibration of the DVAs can be written as

{Z} = Z_{r e f} {s_{1, r}, s_{2, r}, \dots, s_{n, r}, \dots, s_{M, r}}^{T}

(23)where

s_{n, r} = φ_{j} (x_{n}, y_{n})

Z_{r e f}

is the reference value of the vibration displacement amplitude. The vector in equation (23) constitutes the vibration shape of the distributed DVAs.

Substitution of equation (23) into equation (22) leads to

(- ω^{2} [M_{j M}] + j ω [D_{j M}] + [K_{j M}]) [S] {\begin{matrix} W_{j} \\ Z_{r e f} \end{matrix}} = {\begin{matrix} f_{0} φ_{j} (x_{0}, y_{0}) \\ {0}_{M} \end{matrix}}

(24)where

[S] = [\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & s_{1, r} \\ ⋮ & ⋮ \\ 0 & s_{M, r} \end{matrix}]

(25)

Defining the following parameters $u = m_{o} / M_{j}$

mass ratio

g = ω / β_{j}

forced frequency ratio

f = ω_{o} / β_{j}

ratio of natural frequencies

δ_{s t, j} = f_{0} / K_{j}

static deformation of the plate

The vibration displacement amplitude of the plate can be expressed as

| \frac{W_{j}}{δ_{s t, j}} | = \frac{φ_{j} (x_{0}, y_{0}) {[{(f^{2} - g^{2})}^{2} + 4 g^{2} ξ_{o}^{2}]}^{1 / 2}}{{4 g^{2} ξ_{o}^{2} {(g^{2} - 1 + A u g^{2})}^{2} + {[A u f^{2} g^{2} - (g^{2} - 1) (g^{2} - f^{2})]}^{2}}^{1 / 2}}

(26)with

A = \sum_{n = 1}^{M} φ_{j}^{2} (x_{n}, y_{n})

(27)

Equation (26) has a same form with the classical vibration displacement amplitude expression of the single DOF system carrying a DVA. Applying the fixed-points theory, the tuned-frequency ratio is given by

f_{o p} = \frac{1}{1 + A u}

(28)

The optimal damping ratio of the distributed DVAs is

ξ_{o, o p} = \sqrt{\frac{3 A u}{8 {(1 + A u)}^{3}}}

(29)

Numerical results and discussions

Numerical validations of the optimization method

The parameters of the plate are still set as shown in Table 1. According to equations (28) and (29), the tuned-frequency ratio and the optimal damping ratio of the DVAs are $f_{o p} =0 .7$ and $ξ_{o, o p} =0 .23$ , respectively, if the DVAs are tuned to suppress the first mode vibration of the plate. Substitution of the two optimized parameters above into equation (26) leads to the vibration displacement of the plate which is shown in Figure 6. The vibration displacement amplitude reaches to a same peak value at $g_{1} = 0 .95$ and $g_{2} = 1 .03$ , respectively.

Figure 6.

First-order modal vibration response of the plate carrying optimized DVAs with the vibration shape assumption.

The realization of the optimization results in Figure 6 is based on the assumption that the vibration shapes of distributed DVAs are same with the corresponding mode shapes of the plate. Substitution of the optimized parameters into equation (22) leads to the modal vibration displacement of the plate which is shown in Figure 7. It should be noted that Figure 7 shows the vibration response of the plate carrying the truly vibrated DVAs without vibration shapes assumptions. As shown as the solid line in Figure 7, the vibration displacement amplitude reaches to a peak value at resonant frequency $G_{1} = 52 Hz$ and $G_{2} = 56 Hz$ , respectively, when the DVAs are designed to control the first modal vibration of the plate. In fact, the two resonant frequencies are consistent with the two frequency ratios of the peaks in Figure 6 as $2 π G_{k} = β_{1} g_{k}$ ( $k = 1, 2$ ). When the DVAs are designed to suppress the second and the third modal vibration of the plate, the two vibration response results of the plate are also plotted as break line and dash dot line in Figure 7, respectively. Compared with the modal vibration responses of the bare plate which are shown as the dotted line in Figure 7, the brilliant vibration suppression effect can be achieved for each mode of the plate through the optimization of the DVAs. The consistencies of the results of equations (22) and (26) can fully prove the correctness of the optimization formulas.

Figure 7.

Vibration suppression effect of the optimized DVAs on the first three modes. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

The effect of the locations and amounts of the DVAs on the vibration reduction performance

After determining the optimal frequency ratios and damping ratios, the optimal locations and the optimal amounts of the distributed DVAs are still needed to be identified to achieve the optimal vibration suppression effect. Below, the vibration suppression performance of the DVAs which are distributed on the different locations on the plate to control the (1, 1), (1, 2) and (2, 2) mode vibrations are studied, respectively. The vibration suppression effect of the DVAs is shown in Figures 8 to 10, while the different DVAs installation method is also illustrated in each figure.

When the DVAs are designed to suppress the first modal vibration of the plate, three installation methods are studied and the vibration responses of the plate are shown in Figure 8. The thick solid line shows the case that a single DVA of a mass $M_{0}$ is located on the centre point on the plate. Equally dividing the DVA into nine identical DVAs, each DVA has a mass $\frac{1}{9} M_{0}$ . The $d$ line shows that the nine identical DVAs are attached on the centre point. It is obvious that the nine identical DVAs installing at the centre point are equivalent to the single DVA having a mass of overall at the same place. When the nine identical DVAs are equally distributed on the surface of the plate, the vibration suppression effect is obviously inferior to the other two installation methods.

Figure 8.

The first modal vibration response of the plate carrying different positioned DVAs. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

As the second mode of the plate has two maximum modal vibration points, two DVAs installation methods are studied when the DVAs are designed to control the second modal vibration of the plate. One of the installation methods is to locate a single DVA of a mass $M_{0}$ at one maximum modal displacement point. The vibration suppression effect of this method is shown as the dash dot line in Figure 9. It is clearly e seen that an undesired vibration at the first modal frequency is caused by the installation of the DVA. By contrast, the undesired vibration cannot be caused when the two identical DVAs (each one has a mass of $\frac{1}{2} M_{0}$ ) distributed on the two maximum modal displacement points on the plate. What’s more, the vibration suppression effect of the distributed DVAs is little bit superior in the frequency band around the second modal frequency of the plate. At the resonant frequencies in the band of [100 Hz, 200 Hz], the vibration displacement peak value of the plate carrying the distributed DVAs is 14.63, while the peak value of the plate carrying the single DVA is 14.67.

Figure 9.

The second modal vibration response of the plate carrying different positioned DVAs. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

When the DVAs are designed to control the third modal vibration of the plate, three DVA installation methods are studied and the vibration suppression effect of the three methods is shown in Figure 10. The total mass of the DVA(s) in each method is set to $M_{0}$ . In the case 1, a single DVA is located at one maximum modal vibration displacement point. In the case 2, two identical DVAs are located at two oppositely phased maximum modal vibration displacement points. Compared with using single DVA, a significantly better vibration control for the third mode of the plate is achieved when using two distributed DVAs. Unfortunately, the severe undesired vibrations at the second modal frequency are caused by the DVA(a) in the case 1 and case 2. In the case 3 which is shown as the solid line in Figure 10, four DVAs are distributed at all the maximum modal vibration displacement points on the plate. Compared with the case 1 and case 2, the best vibration control for the third mode of the plate is obtained without any undesired vibrations at any frequencies.

Figure 10.

The third modal vibration response of the plate carrying different positioned DVAs. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

multi-modes vibration control using distributed DVAs

For the primary vibration mode of the plate, a single DVA can be used to achieve an ideal vibration suppression effect. However, multiple DVAs should be distributed on the maximum modal vibration displacement points to achieve the optimal vibration suppression effect for the higher order modes. Through the optimizations of the parameters and the reasonable settings of the distribution locations of the DVAs, a brilliant multi-modes vibration control effect can be realized.

When the first three modes of the rectangular plate in this paper are as the vibration control targets, the distribution of the DVAs is shown in Figure 11. DVA1, DVA2 and DVA3 are attached on the plate to control the vibrations at the first, second and the third natural frequencies, respectively. The plate has two identical modes (1,2) and (2, 1) at the second natural frequency. Respect to this aspect, four identical DVAs (marked as DVA2) are used to control the vibration. The mass ratio of the all DVAs to the plate is set to 0.01. The vibration responses of the plate are shown in Figure 12.

Figure 11.

Distribution locations of the DVAs used for multiple modes vibration control (the mass of DVA1 is $M_{0}$ , DVA2 $0.25 M_{0}$ and DVA3 $0.25 M_{0}$ ). DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

Figure 12.

Multi-modes vibration control effect of the optimized distributed DVAs. DVA: dynamic vibration absorber.

In Figure 12, the vibration response of the bare plate is plotted as the break line. The vibration suppression result of the distributed DVAs which are optimized by the method proposed in this paper is shown as the solid line. It can be seen that a brilliant multi-modes vibration control effect is realized through using the optimization method given in this paper. The optimization result of the classical optimization method is also calculated which is shown as the dotted line. Since there are no parameters in the classical optimization formulas to consider the locations of the DVA, the vibration suppression effect of the classical optimization method is clearly inferior to the novel method proposed in this paper. The optimization formulas given in this paper will be reduced to be the form of DAYOU’s optimization formulas if the distributed DVAs are reduced to a single DVA. For the optimizations of the distributed DVAs or multiple DVAs, the optimization method proposed in this paper is more applicable.

Conclusions

The optimization method of the distributed DVAs which are used to suppress vibrations of a plate is studied in this paper and the concise optimization formulas are proposed. Equations of motions of a rectangular plate carrying distributed DVAs are established by modal superposition method. The vibration characteristics of the DVAs are analysed by solving the corresponding eigenvalue problems of the vibration equations. The results of the analysis show that the vibration shapes of the distributed DVAs at new resonant frequencies are same as the corresponding mode shapes of the bare plate. Based on the vibration characteristics of the DVAs and under the assumption that the vibration of the plate is dominated by a single mode in a certain band, the original vibration system can be expressed as a two DOF system. Extending the fixed-points theory to the two DOF system, the optimization formulas for the distributed DVAs are derived. By numerical simulations, the correctness of the optimization formulas is verified. The numerical simulations also show that the DVAs should be distributed on the plate to achieve the optimal suppression effect of the higher order modal vibrations. It is worth pointing out that the optimization formulas proposed in this paper are applicable for the DVAs which are arbitrarily distributed on the arbitrarily shaped plate structure.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was fully supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFB1300600) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61304037).

References

Frahm

Device for damping vibrations of bodies. Patent 989, 958, USA, 1911.

Huang

Fuller

CR.

Vibration and noise control of the fuselage via dynamic absorbers. J Vib Acoust 1998; 120: 496–502.

Zhu

Yang

Yan

et al . Low-frequency vibration control of floating slab tracks using dynamic vibration absorbers. Veh Syst Dyn 2015; 53: 1296–1314.

Gardonio

Zilletti

Sweeping tuneable vibration absorbers for low-mid frequencies vibration control. J Sound Vib 2015; 354: 1–12.

Nishida

Koopmann

GH.

A method for designing and fabricating broadband vibration absorbers for structural noise control. J Vib Acoust 2007; 129: 397.

Gardonio

Zilletti

Integrated tuned vibration absorbers: a theoretical study. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 134: 3631–3644.

Zilletti

Gardonio

Experimental implementation of switching and sweeping tuneable vibration absorbers for broadband vibration control. J Sound Vib 2015; 334: 164–177.

Acar

Yilmaz

design of an adaptive-passive dynamic vibration absorber composed of a string-mass system equipped with negative stiffness tension adjusting mechanism. J Sound Vib 2013; 332: 231–245.

Hwang

Kim

Park

et al . Control of floor vibration and noise using multiple tuned mass dampers. Noise Control Eng J 2011; 59: 652.

10.

Gao

Brennan

Sui

Control of flexural waves on a beam using distributed vibration neutralizers. J Sound Vib 2011; 330: 2758–2771.

11.

Thompson

DJ.

A continuous damped vibration absorber to reduce broad-band wave propagation in beams. J Sound Vib 2008; 311: 824–842.

12.

Marano

Greco

Optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers for structural vibration control under stochastic excitation. J Vib Control 2010; 17: 679–688.

13.

Igusa

Vibration control using multiple tuned mass dampers. J Sound Vib 1994; 175: 491–503.

14.

Azoulaya

Veprikb

Babitskya

et al . Distributed absorber for noise and vibration control. Shock Vib 2011; 18: 181–219.

15.

Ormondroyd

DenHartog

JP.

The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber. J Appl Mech 1928; 50: 22–29.

16.

16. Crandall

mark

WD.

Random vibration in mechanical systems. New York: Academic Press, 1963.

17.

Asami

Nishihara

Baz

AM.

Analytical solutions to H∞ and H2 optimization of dynamic vibration absorbers attached to damped linear systems. J Vib Acoust 2002; 124: 284–295.

18.

Shen

Peng

et al . Analytical optimal parameters of dynamic vibration absorber with negative stiffness. Mech Syst Sig Proc 2017; 85: 193–203.

19.

Jacquot

RG.

Suppression of random vibration in plates using vibration absorbers. J Sound Vib 2001; 248: 585–596.

20.

Cheung

Wong

WO.

H∞ and H2 optimizations of a dynamic vibration absorber for suppressing vibrations in plates. J Sound Vib 2009; 320: 29–42.

21.

Dayou

Fixed-points theory for global vibration control using vibration neutralizer. J Sound Vib 2006; 292: 765–776.

22.

Chen

Huang

YH.

Timoshenko beam with tuned mass dampers and its design curves. J Sound Vib 2004; 278: 873–888.

23.

Yang

Cheng

Dynamic vibration absorbers for vibration control within a frequency band. J Sound Vib 2011; 330: 1582–1598.

24.

Howard

Hansen

Zander

Vibro-acoustic noise control treatments for payload bays of launch vehicles: discrete to fuzzy solutions. Appl Acoust 2005; 66: 1235–1261.

25.

Michielsen

Arteaga

Nijmeijer

LQR-based optimization of multiple tuned resonators for plate sound radiation reduction. J Sound Vib 2016; 363: 166–180.

Optimizations of distributed dynamic vibration absorbers for suppressing vibrations in plates

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Equations of motions

Vibration characteristics of the DVAs

Optimizations of the distributed DVAs

Numerical results and discussions

Numerical validations of the optimization method

The effect of the locations and amounts of the DVAs on the vibration reduction performance

multi-modes vibration control using distributed DVAs

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

References