Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools and Assistive Technologies (AT) can support people with Down Syndrome (PDS) and Intellectual Disabilities (PID) in increasing their self-confidence and independence, enhancing skills, and competences, participating in leisure activities. For families of PDS/PID, professionals, non-formal caregivers and volunteers, the challenge is to appreciate the benefits of ICT Tools in promoting inclusion. The aim of this study is to present the interdisciplinary and multidimensional scope of the DS Leisure project aiming at promoting the inclusion of PDS/PID through innovative ICT tools and their participation in inclusive leisure activities. Particularly, 24 individuals were asked to assess the global satisfaction and performance of PDS/PID, as well as the exploitation of ICT tools. Findings suggested that PDS/PID specific social, decision-making, and communication skills were significantly improved after their participation in the Experiential Activity and the e-Training platform was positively rated and considered a constructive learning experience.

Keywords

assistive technologies intellectual disabilities ICT tools inclusion leisure

Introduction

‘Intellectual Disability’ (ID) affects between 1% and 3% of the world population and is characterized by multiple conditions that impair brain’s development before and during birth or in early childhood years.¹ In particular, ID is associated with significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behaviour, with the latter covering a wide range of everyday social and practical skills.² Among the major related conditions to ID, ‘Down Syndrome’ (DS) is the most common one, affecting more than five million people worldwide.³ Specifically, DS is a genetic disorder caused by an additional chromosome (chromosome 21) which causes developmental delays to physical and mental conditions that are associated with consequences in the areas of cognitive, linguistic, speech-motor and social development.^4,5 In comparison with typically developing peers, People with DS (PDS) face problems in communication and social skills, since it is challenging for them to express themselves.⁶ Consequently, they have fewer opportunities to participate in out-of-school activities⁷ and, thus, are at risk of being poorly integrated into society.⁸ However, there is a common perception that participation in physical, leisure, recreational and self-improvement activities has undoubtedly important developmental, health and social benefits for people with disabilities.⁹ Many studies have empirically supported the role of social relations and active leisure experiences in happiness and well-being.^10,11 This suggests the need for ongoing support of PDS and other IDs in order to develop and enhance the skills necessary for effective use of leisure time and to facilitate full inclusion.¹²

It is clear that the increasing deployment of ICT tools in society presents new possibilities and solutions,¹³ sets an innovative basis for future learning and promotes inclusion.¹⁴ Due to their intellectual limitations, PDS need efficient support and stimulation to function individually, thus software could be designed in such way in order to facilitate and introduce the sequence of steps to achieve success.¹⁵ ICT tools can extend the learning process beyond the school by helping PDS and PID to practice and maintain skills between courses and increase motivation to change their behaviours and daily life.¹⁶ Particularly, Assistive Technologies (AT) may contribute in building self-confidence, independence and in achieving high quality of life for PDS,^17,18 while at the same time in providing assistance during leisure time and participation in social activities.¹⁹ Additionally, the interaction with serious games can be an effective approach for PID, as long as they are specifically designed considering their unique characteristics and cognitive abilities.²⁰

Research has shown that the field of inclusion of individuals with special needs has advanced and has received essential development since 2000,²¹ while the support of PID, in order to help them overcome challenges in specific areas, is addressed as an essential aim by many research approaches.²² A series of ICT tools and AT, which are addressed to provide support and assistance to a generic or specific learning skill for PDS and PID, are presented in the literature. For instance, SMART ANGEL is oriented to support the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities by providing them with accessible software products supporting their daily life, in-house independent living, urban mobility and training,²³ while the project Poseidon aims at enhancing independence of PDS and triggers their inclusion into society by using AT focusing on different areas of daily living.²⁴ Moreover, systems based on the utilization of game elements and gamification tools, including the HATLE, a computer aided tool on an Android platform that provides a multimedia playful learning environment¹⁵ and Stella Software, an online application aiming at enhancing PDS cognitive and mental functions.²⁵ Furthermore, the presence of learning management systems is also essential, including the online learning system to help persons with developmental deficiencies acquire basic skills in order to be able to perform daily living activities.²⁶

While it could be argued that the use of online e-learning systems has grown considerably over recent years²⁷ and there is a more extended deployment of ICT tools aiming at helping PDS/PID to communicate with others, improve their academic performance and motivation, however there are not enough technological applications tailored to their specific needs.¹⁵

Purpose of the study

The aim of this study is to present the interdisciplinary and multidimensional scope of the DS Leisure project, a unique and innovative training program for improving quality of life of PDS/PID, with the objective to promote the inclusion of PDS/PID through an innovative ICT tools integrated approach and the participation in inclusive leisure activities. In particular, this study focuses on the assessment of (1) global satisfaction of PDS/PID participating in Leisure Experiential Activity, (2) pre-post evaluation of PDS/PID performance in Leisure Experiential Activity and (3) exploitation of ICT tools included in the project’s e-Training platform.

The DS Leisure project

The DS Leisure project²⁸ promotes the inclusion of PDS/PID through an innovative integrated approach based on the participation in inclusive Leisure Activities and the development of high quality adapted ICT tools tailored to the needs of individual low-skilled or low-qualified PDS/PID. Pedagogical design of the project took into account the multisensory principle, where it is highlighted that memory is reinforced when learning occurs simultaneously through multiple senses, such as visual, auditory, tactile-kinesthetic and articulatory-motor.²⁹ In this regard, priority was given to the design and development of accessible and legible presentation of the training materials, as well as to the continuous provision of motivation and maintenance of interest and engagement in the activities. In addition, DS Leisure followed a user-centred approach so as to remove the barriers that undermine inclusion of PDS/PID when technology – enhanced learning tools are designed without accessibility in mind,³⁰ while participatory design was implemented by offering direct involvement of PDS/PID, families, caregivers and professionals of the leisure sector, in the design, development, and validation of the training program.

The innovation of the DS Leisure project lies in the adoption of Living Labs methodologies and guidelines aiming at enabling the direct involvement of a quadruple helix of stakeholders and creating holistic solutions through developing the services from the end-user point of view.³¹ Thus, a systemic active involvement and partnership of PDS/PID, families, caregivers and professionals of the leisure sector was conducted through the deployment of multi-method approaches. Building upon this Living Labs’ perspective, co-creation and co-validation sessions were designed and developed in such way in order to ensure the successful and sustainable involvement of all stakeholders in the design process of the project (Table 1).

Table 1.

Design process of the DS Leisure project.

Stages	Participants	Implementation	Output
1st stage: Co-Creation Working session	PDS/PID, families/caregivers, professionals, researchers	This action was useful for the evaluation and determination of key competences, techniques, methods included in the DS Leisure Training Program	Suite of basis, recommendations and tools
2nd stage: Development of Methodological Guide	Professionals, researchers	Based upon the conclusions and needs emerged from the Co-creation Working Session, the Methodological Guide of DS Leisure was developed	Establishment of schematic approach of key factors, best practices and training methodology
3rd stage: Co-Validation Working Session	PDS/PID, families/caregivers, professionals, researchers	All participants validated the specifications of the Methodological Guide	Evaluation report of complex specifications for training materials
4th stage: Development of the Training Materials, Experiential Activities and e-Training Platform	Professionals, researchers	An analysis of the platform’s requirements and design was conducted and the e-Training Platform was developed, including the Training Materials and Experiential Activities aiming at improving the quality of life of PDS through the implementation of inclusive leisure.	Materials including text-based information, presentations, games and activities, e-Training Platform including ICT tools and AT
5th stage: Exploitation of the Experiential Activities and the e-Training Platform by end-users	PDS/PID, professionals, researchers	Actions including the implementation of the Experiential Activities and the exploitation of the e-Training Platform were conducted.	Implementation report of the project’s methodology
6th stage: Evaluation of the Experiential Activity and the e-Training Platform	PDS/PID, professionals, trainers, researchers	PDS/PID evaluated their participation and experience gained in the Experiential Activities, while trainers and professionals assessed PDS’ performance and content of the e-Training Platform, respectively.	Evaluation report of project’s validation actions

Key outputs of the project

Through the implementation of the DS Leisure project the above main intellectual outputs have aroused: (i) Co-created Methodological Guide for training PDS/PID and their supporters on the implementation of Inclusive Leisure, (ii) Training Materials for creating and improving the critical competences of PDS/PID and professionals of the leisure sector, (iii) Experiential Training Activities for enhancing the practical training within real environments and (iv) e-Training platform, including supporting ICT solutions for the implementation of the Training Materials and Experiential Training Activities.

Experiential training activities

The Experiential Activities were designed with the objective of assuring the immediate and customized acquisition of competences that facilitate social inclusion. Furthermore, they were addressed to PDS/PID in order to practically train them in participating independently in leisure time activities within real environments. In particular, PDS/PID had to perform an activity of their preference in small groups by following a series of steps with which they have been previously acquainted through the e-Training platform.

The e-Training platform

The DS Leisure e-Training platform was based on Moodle Learning Management System.³² Of utmost importance was to set the goal to ensure accessibility in the platform and thus the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Accessibility Initiative³³ provided essential guidance in designing an accessible interface. Colours, font size and all call-to-action elements, including images, buttons or hyperlinks, were adjusted for optimum display to people with disabilities, while badges were used as a good way of celebrating achievement and showing progress for learners (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

DS Leisure e-Training platform.

The e-Training platform was enriched with seven (7) Games and ten (10) Virtual Scenarios tailored to PDS/PID routine operations and inclusive leisure activities. Development of Games and Virtual Scenarios aimed at training the key competencies identified in the co-creation session, including promoting autonomy and inclusion of PDS/PID, increasing self-awareness and self-management, developing social and digital skills and enhancing transversal skills. In particular, Games addressed training PDS/PID in designing their personal leisure plan and participating in various leisure activities, while their content was developed in relation to understanding the potential leisure activities, setting criteria of preference, listing steps in the right order, preparing to go into the action etc. Furthermore, Virtual Scenarios, which are problem-based learning activities, encouraged PDS/PID to make real-life decisions related to daily living leisure activities, including going to the cinema or a concert, making a restaurant reservation, using public transportation, handling money transactions etc. (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Interface of the Games and Virtual Scenarios.

Method

Participants

A total of 24 individuals participated in this study, belonging to three distinct groups: (a) PDS/PID, (b) Trainers and (c) Professionals working in the support of PDS/PID. More specifically, three PDS (one female, two males) and three PID (one female, two males) were asked to evaluate the experience gained from their participation in the DS Leisure training program. In addition, six trainers (five females, one male, Mean Age: 31.6 ± 9.0) supported and observed PDS/PID participation in the training program, while in particular they were asked to evaluate their performance in the Experiential Activity. Additionally, 12 professionals (eight females, four males, Mean Age: 34.3 ± 9.9) working in the support of PDS/PID, including psychologists, special educators, experts in education, computer developers and technicians were involved in the evaluation of the Games and Virtual Scenarios of the training program. They were all initially acquainted with the e-Training platform, while some of them were directly engaged in the implementation of the DS Leisure project as trainers. In addition, informed written consent forms were distributed to all participants in order to be involved in the DS Leisure project.

Procedure

In this subsection, stages 5 and 6 of DS Leisure project’s design process (Table 1) are described. The DS Leisure project was implemented in the premises of a Mixed Living Centre – Daily Care Occupation & Training for Disabled People in the county of Imathia, Greece. Six (6) adults with DS and ID completed a three (3) week leisure training and worked in the e-Training platform, while three (3) trainers coordinated the training process and supported trainees’ performance.

Face to face indoor activities were conducted, where trainees participated in six (6) lessons using the e-Training platform. In particular, three workstations were created for the training in the e-Training platform. At each workstation, two trainees worked in-group on a laptop by the supervision and support of one trainer and workstations were set in a way that could facilitate the collaboration between the trainees during the interaction with the Games and Virtual Scenarios. An outdoor Experiential Activity was also conducted in which trainees agreed on organizing a disco party in an outdoor venue for multiplier events. The basic objectives of this Experiential Activity were to train PDS/PID in organizing a leisure activity on their own, classifying the necessary steps and essentials, as well as dealing with public transportation, street orientation and financial transactions. Six (6) trainees participated in a one-hour workshop, including preparation and guidelines for the Experiential Activity and in a one-hour shopping in the local mall to buy all the necessary essentials, while separate roles were assigned to each of them. Five (5) professionals, four (4) representatives of the leisure sector and fifteen (15) caregivers/volunteers also joined the Experiential Activity as supporters, whereas more than thirty (30) guests attended the party. After the completion of the training program, assessment was conducted in two levels: in relation to (a) the Experiential Activity and (b) the e-Training platform including Games and Virtual Scenarios.

Instrumentation – assessment

The data presented in this study emerged from the assessments regarding PDS/PID performance and their global satisfaction participating in the Experiential Activity, as well as from professionals’ evaluation of the Games and Virtual Scenarios included in the e-Training platform. More specifically, an observation checklist [D111] with a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), comprised of 45 items in relation to social and communication skills, ability to make choices and proposals, orientation and street behaviour, use of money, services and transports, and events behaviour, was distributed to trainers in order to evaluate PDS/PID overall performance, before and after their participation in the Experiential Activity of the training program. Furthermore, PDS/PID evaluated their global satisfaction from participating in the Experiential Activity through a 7-item questionnaire [D112] based on a 3-point Likert scale (Yes, No, Not sure).

In reference to the e-Training platform, professionals were asked to interact with the Games and Virtual Scenarios and evaluate, subsequently, a series of aspects based on the principles of Game Playability (PLAY) using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) [34]. In particular, a 14-item questionnaire [D113a] was developed for the evaluation of the Games, including a comprehensive set of three categories of heuristics for playability (i.e. Game Play, Coolness/Entertainment/Humour/Emotional Immersion and Usability & Game Mechanics), while a 10-item questionnaire [D113b] was developed for the evaluation of the Virtual Scenarios, assessing their adequacy in terms of difficulty level, story immersion, training decision-making and other competencies, as well as learning experience.

Results

Evaluation of PDS/PID performance (D111)

Trainers were asked to evaluate PDS/PID performance before and after participating in the Experiential Activity. A paired-samples t-test was conducted to compare different variables in pre- and post-conditions of PDS/PID (before and after the intervention). There was a significant difference in the scores with regard to the PDS/PID social skills before (M = 3.17, SD = 0.75) and after (M = 3.83, SD = 0.40) intervention; t(5) = −3.16, p = 0.025). In particular, this finding means that after the completion of the Experiential Activity participants adopt behaviours adapted to the various contexts to a greater extent. In addition, higher scores were reported and a significant difference was found in decision making skills before (M = 2.00, SD = 0.89) and after (M = 2.83, SD = 1.16) intervention; t(5) = −5, p = 0.004. Specifically, this finding indicates that PDS/PID are more inclined to propose activities for the group after the Experiential Activity. Lastly, results also showed a significant difference in the scores for participants’ communication skills before (M = 3.16, SD = 0.40) and after (M = 3.83, SD = 0.41) intervention; t(5) = −3.16, p = 0.025, which implies that PDS/PID express their needs, desires and thoughts to a greater degree.

PDS/PID evaluation of the experiential activity (D112)

PDS/PID evaluated their global satisfaction after participating in the Experiential Activity. In particular, all participants stated that they fully enjoyed their participation in the Experiential Activity, while the majority of them (83,3%) appreciated the usefulness of the workshops initially conducted, including preparation and provision of guidelines for the Experiential Activity. In addition, neither of the participants faced any problem with transportation to the venue and the majority of them (83,3%) declared that they dealt with all financial transactions needed successfully. During the Experiential Activity most of the participants (83,3%) felt that they behaved well and properly, while more than half of them (66,6 %) declared that they asked for help and support. Overall, all of them clearly stated that the Experiential Activity was a significantly constructive experience for them and that they were willing to participate again in such a leisure activity.

Evaluation of the games (D113a)

Descriptive statistics analysis

This subsection presents the results from professionals’ evaluation regarding the playability of Games. As shown in Table 2, all items had their means scored slightly higher than 3, ranged between 3.00–3.69, which indicates that the Games were neutral to positive rating. Participants exhibited a higher acceptance (M > 3.50) in relation to the information given to the user (item 14), the absence of unnecessary burden (item 12), the positive challenges (item 3), the clear goals (item 4) and the screen layout efficiency (item 13). On the other hand, specialists gave moderate and lower rating (M < 3.50) for the ability of the games to keep users interest (item 1, 2, 7), support different game styles (item 5), give control to the users (item 6), provide efficient audio/visual content and feedback (item 8, 11) and require instructions (item 9).

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics ensued from the Games questionnaire (D113a).

Statistics	Mean	Mode	Std. deviation
1. The players find the game fun, with no repetitive or boring tasks.	3.41	3	1.268
2. Game play is enduring and keeps the players interested.	3.45	3	1.242
3. Challenges are positive game experiences, rather than negative experiences, resulting in wanting to play more, rather than quitting.	3.66	5	1.289
4. The game goals are clear.	3.66	5	1.37
5. The game supports a variety of game styles.	3.45	3	1.088
6. The players have a sense of control and influence onto the game world.	3.31	4	1.285
7. The game offers something different in terms of attracting and retaining the players’ interest.	3.28	3	1.032
8. The game utilizes audio and visual content to further the players’ immersion in the game.	3.21	2^a	1.236
9. Player does not need to read the manual or documentation to play.	3.14	2^a	1.187
10. Game controls are consistent within the game and follow standard conventions.	3.66	3	1.143
11. Provide appropriate audio/ visual/ visceral feedback (music, sound effects, controller vibration).	3	3^a	1.102
12. The game does not put an unnecessary burden on the player.	3.66	5	1.344
13. Screen layout is efficient, integrated and visually pleasing.	3.62	3^a	1.178
14. Upon turning on the game, the player has enough information to begin play.	3.69	5	1.285

Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown.

Correlation analysis regarding the games

A Spearman correlation coefficient was used to identify the relationship between the questionnaires items related to heuristics of games playability,³⁴ as shown in Table 3, which explicitly shows the variables that indicated a significant positive correlation. In particular, the enduring game play of the Games was significantly and positively related to clear games’ goals, varied game styles, sense of control to the user and efficient screen layout. Furthermore, the clarity of games’ goals and varied game styles were both significantly correlated to the sense of control, as well as to the games’ efficient screen layout. In addition, the correlation analysis signified a positive relationship between the no-necessity of guidance through manual or documentation and no burden during interaction. Lastly, the appropriate audio/visual feedback provided to the games was interrelated to no burden during the interaction and the games’ efficient screen layout.

Table 3.

Correlation analysis regarding the Games (D113a).

Variable 1	Variable 2	r_s	p Value
Enduring game play	Clear game goals	0.89	0.000
	Varied game styles	0.69	0.012
	Sense of control	0.62	0.029
	Efficient screen layout	0.75	0.005
Clear game goals	Sense of control	0.64	0.023
Clear game goals	Efficient screen layout	0.57	0.050
Varied game styles	Sense of control	0.64	0.025
Varied game styles	Efficient screen layout	0.73	0.006
No-necessity of manual or documentation guidance	No burden during interaction	0.66	0.019
Provision of appropriate audio/visual feedback	No burden during interaction	0.61	0.034
Provision of appropriate audio/visual feedback	Efficient screen layout	0.63	0.028

Evaluation of the virtual scenarios (D113b)

Descriptive statistics analysis

Table 4 presents the descriptive statistics (i.e. Mean, Mode and Standard Deviation) for each item of the Virtual Scenarios retrieved from professionals’ evaluation. On the whole, the mean scores ranged between 3.21 and 3.83, suggesting a moderate to high acceptance of the Virtual Scenarios. Participants most often agreed or strongly agreed with the majority of the evaluation items (i.e. 6 out of 10), underpinning the value of the Virtual Scenarios in terms of story immersion (item 2), training decision-making (items 1, 3, 4, 6) and overall learning experience (item 10). On the other hand, they most often expressed a neutral opinion towards their difficulty level (item 5) and skill gains regarding management (item 9), money transactions (item 7) and use of transportation (item 8).

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics ensued from the Virtual Scenarios questionnaire (D113b).

Statistics	Mean	Mode	Std. deviation
1. While working on the Virtual Scenarios, the trainee felt that he had to make the same decisions as in real life.	3.72	5	1.131
2. While working on the Virtual Scenarios, the trainee felt he/she was the person who leads the story of the scenario.	3.69	5	1.198
3. The trainee was actively engaged in gathering the information he/she needed to make decisions.	3.83	5	1.227
4. The trainee was actively engaged in revising his/her decisions as new information became available.	3.52	4	1.184
5. The trainee felt that the case in each Virtual Scenario was at the appropriate level of difficulty for his/her level of training.	3.21	3	1.177
6. The questions the trainee was asked, while working through the Virtual Scenarios, were helpful in understanding the importance of making the right decision.	3.72	4^a	1.162
7. After completing the Virtual Scenarios the trainee had a better understanding on dealing with money.	3.21	3	1.177
8. After completing the Virtual Scenarios the trainee had a better understanding on dealing with transportation means.	3.45	3	1.152
9. The trainee learned more about how to deal with the given situation through the Virtual Scenarios.	3.48	3	1.243
10. Overall, working through the Virtual Scenarios was a worthwhile learning experience.	3.83	5	1.284

Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown.

Correlation analysis regarding the virtual scenarios

Data obtained from the questionnaire regarding the Virtual Scenarios were also analysed using Spearman’s correlation analysis (Table 5). Among the variables that indicated a significant and positive relationship, PDS/PID understanding of the importance of successful decision making was correlative with the better understanding of money transactions and the improvement of their managerial skills. Moreover, PDS/PID better understanding of the transportation means was significantly interrelated to Virtual Scenarios’ content adhesion to real life, PDS/PID engagement in gathering essential information during the interaction with Virtual Scenarios, the understanding of the importance of successful decision making, as well as their better understanding of money transactions. Finally, Virtual Scenarios’ value as a constructive learning experience was significantly and positively correlated to PDS/PID engagement in gathering essential information, the importance of decision making, the better understanding of transportation means and improvement of management skills.

Table 5.

Correlation analysis regarding the Virtual Scenarios (D113b).

Variable 1	Variable 2	r_s	p Value
Understanding the importance of successful decision making	Better understanding of money transactions	0.62	0.029
Understanding the importance of successful decision making	Improvement of management skills	0.61	0.033
Apprehension/familiarity of/with transportation means	Real-life content	0.63	0.028
	Gathering essential information	0.65	0.022
	Understanding the importance of successful decision making	0.77	0.003
	Better understanding of money transactions
Value of the learning experience	Gathering essential information	0.97	0.000
	Understanding the importance of successful decision making	0.62	0.032
	Better understanding of transportation means	0.65	0.022
	Improvement of management skills	0.57	0.050

Discussion and conclusions

The systematic marginalization of PID from organized leisure activities³⁵ as well as the conventional practice of designing ICT tools for this group of people with no consideration of their needs¹⁸ is the two-fold gap that undermines inclusion and the challenge tackled through the DS Leisure project. In DS Leisure project, sound pedagogical approaches were supported by participatory design in order to develop a training program for improving quality of life of PDS/PID through inclusive leisure, based upon the exploitation of ICT tools tailored to the needs of this population. PDS/PID, families, caregivers and professionals of the leisure sector were all involved across the whole course of the project and actively participated in the design, development, and validation of the training materials, ICT tools and methods. The evaluation of the training program demonstrated successful outcomes both in terms of competences and learning satisfaction in PDS/PID, and acceptance of the ICT tools (i.e. Games and Virtual Scenarios) from the professionals working in their support. Specifically, social, communication and decision-making skills were significantly improved after the participation of PDS/PID in the six lessons of the DS Leisure e-Training platform and the Experiential Activity. Additionally, PDS/PID showed high self-efficacy during their participation in Experiential Activity, expressing a strong belief in their ability to meet the challenges of this particular situation, and also perceived this challenge as an enjoyable and constructive experience. Professionals positively appraised the playability of the Games and they mentioned story immersion, training in decision-making and the overall learning experience as the main factors that contributed to the adequacy of the Virtual Scenarios.

Despite the limitation of the small PDS/PID sample, evaluation of the training program was multi-faceted and encompassed feedback from varied groups of stakeholders, including trainers, trainees and professionals. Although it is often difficult to attribute outcomes to the participatory process or to some other contextual or design features, the potentialities of participatory research in increasing the quality of outputs and outcomes produced are well-documented³⁶ and are reflected upon the promising results of this study, as well.

Based upon these results, there is the scope of achieving sustainability of the DS Leisure project through the mainstreaming and multiplication process of transferring its successful results to appropriate decision-makers in regulated local, regional, national or European systems. In this vein, a lifelong learning e-platform, as part of a wider training program provided primarily to people who work or are involved in the support of health and care provision (professionals, formal and informal carers, family members), will be launched. The overall training program will focus on providing care-related training based on DS Leisure project’s experiential learning techniques and simulation technology, delivered through online and face-to-face contact. Drawing together assets and experiences from a wide range of current and previous projects, the course will be divided into a series of distinct and mutually reinforcing areas related to PDS/PID and other vulnerable groups of people.

In addition, it could be argued that the COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictive regulations that have been implemented globally, have affected the whole spectrum of daily life and caused significant disruption to the provision of education, training and mobility opportunities for learners, trainers, educators etc. Necessary changes, therefore, have been set of utmost importance, whilst the deployment of such online learning systems that promote learning and provide social care and interaction has been accelerated.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Ioanna Dratsiou

Maria Metaxa

Evangelia Romanopoulou

Foteini Dolianiti

Panagiotis Bamidis

References

United Nations Development Program. United Nations: Disability Inclusive Development in UNDP. Guidance and entry point, https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/democratic-governance/human_rights/disability-inclusive-development-in-undp.html (2018, assessed 24 April 2020).

American Psychiatric Association (APA). What is intellectual disability?, https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/intellectual-disability/what-is-intellectual-disability (2017, accessed 24 April 2020).

ECNP. Down syndrome and other genetic developmental disorders network, https://www.ecnp.eu/research-innovation/ECNP-networks/List-ECNP-Networks/Down-syndrome (2019, accessed 24 April 2020).

Nadel

The psychobiology of DS. General ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988, p.156.

Chapman

Hesketh

LJ.

Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2000; 6(2): 84–95.

Buckley

Le Prèvost

Speech and language therapy for children with Down syndrome. Down Synd News Update 2002; 2(2): 70–76.

Shields

Synnot

Barr

Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity for children with disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2012; 465: 989–997.

Engler

Schulze

POSEIDON-bringing assistive technology to people with Down syndrome: results of a three year European project. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 236: 169–175.

Law

King

, et al. Patterns of participation in recreational and leisure activities among children with complex physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48(5): 337–342.

10.

Holder

Coleman

The contribution of social relationships to children’s happiness. J Happiness Stud 2009; 10(3): 329–349.

11.

Holder

Coleman

Sehn

ZL.

The contribution of active and passive leisure to children’s well-being. J Health Psychol 2009; 14(3): 378–386.

12.

Buttimer

Tierney

Patterns of leisure participation among adolescents with a mild intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil 2005; 9: 25–42.

13.

Gates

Atherton

Learning disabilities: toward inclusion. 6th ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone, 2007, pp.68–89.

14.

Acedo

Herrera

Traver

MTB

. Las TIC como herramienta de apoyo para personas con Trastorno del Espectro Autista (TEA). Revista de Educación Inclusiva 2017; 9: 102–136.

15.

Felix

Mena

Ostos

, et al. A pilot study of the use of emerging computer technologies to improve the effectiveness of reading and writing therapies in children with Down syndrome. Br J Educ Technol 2016: 48(2): 611–624.

16.

Centerstone Research Institute. App impact: a framework for mobile health technology, behavioral healthcare, https://www.slideshare.net/eddodds/appimpact-a-framework-for-mobile-technology-in-behavioral-healthcare (2015, accessed 24 April 2020).

17.

Reed

Lahm

EA.

A resource guide for teachers and administrators about assistive technology. Wisconsin, WI: Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative, 2007.

18.

Feng

Lazar

Kumin

, et al. Computer usage by children with Down syndrome: challenges and future research. J ACM Trans Access Comput 2010; 2(3): 1–44.

19.

Erdem

Students with special educational needs and assistive technologies: a literature review. Turk Online J Educ Technol 2017; 16(1): 128–146.

20.

Cano

Fernández-Manjón

García-Tejedor

. Using game learning analytics for validating the design of a learning game for adults with intellectual disabilities. Br J Educ Technol 2018; 49(4): 659–672.

21.

Istenic-Starcic

Bagon

ICT-supported learning for inclusion of people with special needs: review of seven educational technology journals, 1970–2011. Br J Educ Technol 2014; 45(2): 202–230.

22.

Dawe

. Understanding mobile phone requirements for young adults with cognitive disabilities. In: 9th International ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility, Tempe Arizona, 10–12 October 2007, pp.179–186. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

23.

Bottino

Freina

Ott

, et al. Cloud-mobile assistive technologies for people with intellectual impairments: a Microsoft Azure-based solution. In: 5th International conference on digital health (DH ‘15), Florence, Italy, 18–20 May 2015, pp.103–104. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

24.

Rus

Braun

. Money handling training – applications for persons with Down syndrome. In: 12th International conference on intelligent environments (IE), London, 25–28 June 2018, pp.214–217. New York, NY: IEEE.

25.

Bargagna

Bozza

Buzzi

, et al. Computer-based cognitive training in adults with down’s syndrome. In: International conference on universal access in human–computer interaction, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 22–27 June 2014, pp.197–208. Cham: Springer.

26.

Morales-Villaverde

Caro

Gotfrid

, et al. Online learning system to help people with developmental disabilities reinforce basic skills. In: 18th International ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS ‘16), New York, NY, 23–26 October 2016, pp.43–51. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

27.

Cinquin

Guitton

Sauzéon

Online e-learning and cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. Comput Educ Elsevier 2019; 130: 152–167.

28.

Training program for improving quality of life through inclusive leisure for persons with Down syndrome-DS leisure, https://www.dsleisure.eu/ (2020, accessed 24 April 2020).

29.

Moats

Farrell

ML.

Multisensory structured language education. In: Birsh

(ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, 2005, pp. 23–41.

30.

Buzzi

Perrone

, et al. Personalized technology-enhanced training for people with cognitive impairment. Univ Access Inform Soc 2019; 18(4): 891–907.

31.

EU-MACS project. Guidelines for living labs in climate services, http://eu-macs.eu/outputs/livinglabs/ (accessed 24 April 2020).

32.

Moodle – open-source learning platform, https://moodle.org (2020, accessed 24 April 2020).

33.

Making the Web Accessible. Web accessibility initiative (WAI), https://www.w3.org/WAI/ (accessed 24 April 2020).

34.

Desurvire

Wiberg

. Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: the next iteration. In: International conference on online communities and social computing, San Diego, CA, 19–24 July 2009, pp.557–566. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

35.

Melbøe

Ytterhus

Disability leisure: in what kind of activities, and when and how do youths with intellectual disabilities participate?

Scand J Disabil Res 2017; 19(3): 245–255.

36.

Jagosh

Macaulay

Pluye

, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Quart 2012; 90(2): 311–346.

Eliminating the gap between the use of assistive technologies and the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in leisure activities

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Purpose of the study

The DS Leisure project

Key outputs of the project

Experiential training activities

The e-Training platform

Method

Participants

Procedure

Instrumentation – assessment

Results

Evaluation of PDS/PID performance (D111)

PDS/PID evaluation of the experiential activity (D112)

Evaluation of the games (D113a)

Descriptive statistics analysis

Correlation analysis regarding the games

Evaluation of the virtual scenarios (D113b)

Descriptive statistics analysis

Correlation analysis regarding the virtual scenarios

Discussion and conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References