The post-take ward round (PTWR) involves the assessment of the latest intake of patients into the hospital. At a busy 400-bed city hospital it had been noted that PTWR notes had, in some cases, become overly brief and uninformative. Previous research had shown that proformas can improve the completeness of the records. So a new proforma was designed and introduced. Its impact on completeness of information was assessed by carrying out an audit of PTWR notes both with and without the proforma. The results showed statistically significant improvements in documentation when the proforma was used. They also showed an improvement in areas of efficiency of record management: for example, the proforma reduced the time taken to retrieve information from the notes, and most users said it saved them time recording in the notes and assimilating information and helped them to speed up patient transfers.
Thompson A.G. , Jacob K., Fulton J., McGavin C.R.Do post-take ward round proformas improve communication and influence quality of patient care?Postgraduate Medical Journal2004; 80 (949); 675-6.
2.
Grainge C., Traer E., Fulton J.Do weekend plan standard forms improve communication and influence quality of patient care?Postgraduate Medical Journal2005; 81; 524-5.
3.
Goodyear H.M. , Lloyd B.W.Can admission notes be improved by using preprinted assessment sheets?Quality in Health Care1995; 4 (3); 190-3.
4.
O'Driscoll B.R. , Al-Nuaimi D.Medical admission records can be improved by the use of a structured proforma. Clinical Medicine2003; 3 (4); 385-6.
5.
Robinson S.M. , Harrison B.D., Lambert M.A.Effect of a preprinted form on the management of acute asthma in an accident and emergency department. Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine1996; 13 (2); 93-7.
6.
Diver A.J., Craig B.F.Admission proforma significantly improves the medical record. Scottish Medical Journal2005; 50 (3); 101-2.
7.
Audit Commission.For Your Information: A Study of Information Management and Systems in the Acute Hospital. London: Stationery Office, 1995.
8.
Aabakken L., Sandstad O., Bach-Gansmo E. et al. Time utilisation in the preparation of medical records. Tidsskrift for Den norske lægeforening1995; 115; 486-7.
9.
Wyatt J.C., Wright P.Design should help use of patients' data. Lancet1998; 352 (9137); 1375-8.
10.
Belmin J., de la Fourniere F., Bellot P., Medjahed S. et al. Quality of the information collected during admission to a hospital geriatric service: importance of a structured medical record. Presse Medicale1998; 27 (30); 1519-22.
Bowns I.R., Newton P., Long S., Walters S. et al. Testing headings for communicating the personal health record: comparison from the recipients' perspective. Health Informatics1999; 5; 179-87.
13.
General Medical Council.Good Medical Practice. London, 1998.
14.
Norwell N.The ten commandments of record keeping. The Journal of the MDU1997; 13; 8-9.
15.
Royal College of Physicians.Standards for record keeping. http://hiu.rcplondon.ac.uk/clinicalstandards/recordsstandards.
16.
Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing. January 2002. http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/cardioresus .
