Computer illiteracy is diminishing as a new generation of retirees become the younger old and display more up-to-date knowledge and skills. However, there are questions about whether this group will be able to continue to update their skills as they get older, and whether it is appropriate to develop technology solutions specifically for this age group or to concentrate on accessible designs for the whole population. We propose that older people may be empowered through involvement in the design and provision of accessible information and technology solutions and through training opportunities in information seeking skills. Access, involvement and training need to be provided in everyday locations, and training needs to be closely related to people's physical, cognitive and information needs and those of the particular communities where they live. These issues are explored using evidence from a number of research projects conducted by the authors.
Manthorpe J. , Malin N., Stubbs H.Older people's views on rural life: a study of three villages. Journal of Clinical Nursing2004; 13 (6b); 97—104.
2.
Wenger G.Clare: myths and realities of ageing in rural Britain. Ageing and Society2001; 21; 117—30.
3.
Department of Health.Better Information, Better Choices, Better Health: Putting Information at the Centre of Health . London: DOH, 2004.
4.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Social Exclusion Unit. A Sure Start to Later Life: Ending Inequalities for Older People. SEU Final Report. London: ODPM, 2006.
5.
Department of Health.Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: New Direction for Community Services. London: DOH, 2006.
6.
Gann, Bob.Human search engines and choice navigators (guest editorial). Health Information and Libraries Journal2004; 21 (3); 1—4.
7.
Wanless D.Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long Term View. London : HM Treasury, 2002.
8.
Quinn A., Snowling A., Denicolo P.Older People's Perspectives: Devising Information, Advice and Advocacy Services . York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation , 2003.
9.
Chatman E.Channels to a larger social world: older women staying in contact with the greater society. Library and Information Science Research1991; 13; 281—300.
10.
Kolek C.R.Elderly People in Eden: Independence and the Supportive Network. Penrith: Age ConcernEden, 1993.
11.
Department of Health.The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century. DOH, 2001.
12.
Department of Health.The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. DOH , 2000.
13.
Department of Health.National Service Framework for Older People. DOH, 2001.
14.
Muir Gray J.A.The resourceful patient: a web based book and toolkit for those wishing to address the problems of healthcare in the 21st century. 2003. http://www.resourcefulpatient.org/ , March 2006.
15.
Hindmarch M. , et al. Digital gerontechnology: opportunities, approaches and state of the art. 2006. http://www.codeworks.net/atl/templates/ATL/data/DiGOASpercent20Policy.pdf , May 2006.
16.
Government Statistics.Annual data from the ICT module of the NS Omnibus Survey. 2004 . http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/nugget.asp?ID=914&Pos=1&ColRank=1&Rank=374 , March 2006.
17.
Age Concern. Older people and IT (Microsoft Survey). 2004. http://www.ageconcern.org.uk, February 2006.
18.
Pew Internet and American Life Survey.Health information. 2005. http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/156/report_display.asp, February 2006.
19.
Oxford Internet Survey (OxIS).The Internet in Britain. 2005. http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/oxis/oxis2005_report.pdf, February 2006.
20.
Becker S.A.A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources. ACM Transactions on Computer—Human Interaction (TOCHI)2004; 11 (4); 387—406.
21.
Gunther Eysenbach G, Powell J., Kuss O., Eun-Ryoung Sa E-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association2002; 287 (20); 2691—700.
22.
Health On the Net Foundation.HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for Medical and Health Web Sites. http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html, February 2006.
23.
European Union.Quality criteria for health related websites. http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/ehealth/quality/draft_guidelines/index_en.htm, February 2006.
24.
Silberg W.M. , Lundberg G.D., Musacchio R.A.Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveat lector et viewor — let the reader and viewer beware. Journal of the American Medical Association1997; 277 (15); 1244—5.
25.
NHS Health Development Agency and CHIQ.QUICK: The QUality Information ChecKlist. http://www.quick.org.uk/ , February 2006.
26.
Cline R.J., Haynes K.M.Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art . Health Education Research2001; 16 (6); 671—92.
27.
Childs S.Judging the quality of Internet-based health information. Performance Measurement and Metrics2005; 6 (2); 80—96.
28.
Fox N.Use of the Internet by medical voluntary groups in the UK. Social Science and Medicine2001; 52 (1); 155—6.
29.
Oravec J.A.On the 'proper use' of the Internet: self-help medical information and on-line health care. Journal of Health and Social Policy2001; 14 (1); 37—60.
30.
Contact a Family and The Information Management Research Institute, School of Informatics, Northumbria University. Judge: web sites for health . http://www.judgehealth.org.uk/, March 2006.
31.
Childs S.Developing health website quality assessment guidelines for the voluntary sector: outcomes from the Judge Project. Health Information and Libraries Journal2004; 21 (Suppl.2); 14—26.
32.
Capel S., Farrugia M.North Cumbria Health: the development of a web site for patients and the public in North Cumbria and the information needs of older people. Health Information on the Internet2005; 46; 6—8.
33.
Edwards W.K.Enabling technology for users with special needs. Paper presented at IHM-HCI 2001, Lille, France.
34.
Edwards W.K., Grinter R.E.At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. Paper presented at Ubicomp2001, Atlanta, USA .
35.
Banwell L., Vickers P., Green G., Heaford S.Technology in the ideal home: scoping the development of multimodal technology to support the everyday lives of older people 2005. Codeworks ATL. http://www.codeworks.net/atl/templates/ATL/data/Domotics.pdf , May 2006.
36.
Government Statistics.Region in figures: north west, winter 2002. 2005. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_compendia/region_in_figures_winter04/North_West.pdf, February 2006.
37.
Cullen R.Addressing the digital divide. Online Information Review2001; 25 (5); 311—20.
38.
Intelligent Communities.Wired Up Communities, Practitioner's Toolkit: The Alston Moor Project. www.intelligentcommunities.org.uk/profiles/alston.htm, February 2006.
39.
Devins D., et al. Connecting communities to the Internet: evaluation of the Wired Up Communities Programme. Case Study Alston Moor. Policy Research Institute. Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University; 2002.
40.
Lievrouw L.A. , Farb S.E.Information and equity. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology2003; 37 (11); 499—540.
41.
Ginman M.Social capital as a communicative paradigm. Health Informatics Journal2003; 9 (1); 57—64.
42.
Savolainen R.Sense-making theory: reviewing the interests of a user-centred approach to information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management1993; 29 (1); 13—28.
43.
Sonnenwald D.H.Evolving perspectives of information behavior: contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons. In Exploring the Contexts of Information Behaviour: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts. Sheffield , UK. pp. 13—15. London: Taylor Graham , 1998.
44.
Pettigrew K.E.Waiting for chiropody: contextual results from an ethnographic study of the information behavior among attendees at community clinics. Information Processing and Management1999; 35 (6); 801—17.
45.
Fisher K., Naumer C.Something old, something new: preliminary findings from an exploratory study about people's information habits and information grounds. Information Research2005; 10 (2); 1—19. http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper223.html , October 2005.
46.
Granovetter M.The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology1973; 78; 1360—80.
47.
Johnson C.A.Choosing people: the role of social capital in information seeking behaviour. Information Research2004; 10 (1); 1—16. http://informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper201.html, June 2005.
48.
Haythornthwaite C.Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Science Research1996; 18; 323—42.
Silverman D.Qualitative Methodology and Sociology. Aldershot: Gower, 1985.
51.
B Morgan D.Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 1988.
52.
Cooper J., Lewis R., Urquhart C.Using participant and non-participant observation to explain information behaviour . Information Research2004; 9 (4); 1—18. http://informationr.net/ir/9-4/paper184.html, January 2006.
53.
Cumbria County Council Statistics.Cumbria's Parishes — People (Census 2001). www.cumbria.gov.uk/factsandfigures/Statisticsal-summaries/parish-profiles.asp ), February 2006.
54.
Roulstone A.Public Policy Opportunities. DiGOAS report for Codeworks ATL, University of Sunderland, 2005.
