The aim of this evaluation was to examine how specialist portals within the UK’s National electronic Library for Health were developing as communities of practice to support continuing professional development. Objectives included a literature review, to inform the development of an appraisal framework for the individual portals, and interviews with portal development teams and stakeholder groups. Appraisals of the websites and the data from the interviews showed that most of the specialist portals had evolved beyond the initial stages of community of practice development. Further planning of outsourcing would require a balance between maintaining a recognizable identity for the portals and not stifling the creativity of the development tea
References
1.
1 Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1998.
2.
2 Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1991.
3.
3 Gongla P, Rizzuto C R. Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience . IBM Systems Journal2001; 40(4): 842–862 .
4.
4 Moreno A. Enhancing knowledge exchange through communities of practice at the Inter-American Development Bank . Aslib Proceedings2001; 53(8): 296–308 .
6 Butler B S. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: a resource-based model of online social structures . Information Systems Research2001; 12(4): 346–362 .
7.
7 Haythornthwaite C. Exploring multiplexity: social network structures in a computer supported distance learning class . Information Society2001; 17(3): 211–216 .
8.
8 Te’eni D, Sagie A, Schwartz D G, et al. The process of organizational communication: a model and field study . IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication2001; 44(1): 6–20 .
9.
9 Dietz-Uhler B, Bishop-Clark C. The use of computer-mediated communication to enhance subsequent face-to-face discussions . Computers in Human Behavior2001; 17(3): 269–283 .
10.
10 Turner J W, Grube J A, Meyers J. Developing an optimal match within online communities: an exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support . Journal of Communication2001; 51(2): 231–251 .
11.
11 Walsh J P, Kucker S, Maloney N G, Gabbay S. Connecting minds: computer-mediated communication and scientific work . Journal of the American Society for Information Science2000; 51(14): 1295–1305 .
12.
12 Shaw B R, McTavish F, Hawkins R, Gustafson D H, Pingree S. Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network . Journal of Health Communication2000; 5(2): 135–159 .
13.
13 Postmes T, Lea M. Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems . Ergonomics2000; 43(8): 1252–1274 .
14.
14 Lau F, Hayward R. Building a virtual network in a community health research training program . Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association2000; 7(4): 1252–1274 .
15.
15 Hall H. Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets . Journal of Information Science2001; 27(3): 139–146 .
16.
16 Wasko M M, Faraj S. ‘It is what one does’: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice . Journal of Strategic Information Systems2000; 9(2–3): 155–173 .
17.
17 Kling R, McKim G. Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication . Journal of the American Society for Information Science2000; 51(14): 1306–1320 .
18.
18 Orlikowski W J, Yates J. Genre repertoire: the structuring of communicative practices in organizations . Administrative Science Quarterly1994; 39(4): 541–574 .
19.
19 Hancock M. Subject searching behaviour at the library catalogue and at the shelves: implications for online interactive catalogues . Journal of Documentation1987; 43(4): 303–321 .
20.
20 Hancock-Beaulieu M, Robertson S, Neilson C. Evaluation of online catalogues: eliciting information from the user . Information Processing & Management1991; 27(5): 523–532 .
21.
21 Hert C A. Exploring a new model for understanding information retrieval interactions. In Shaw D ed. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 72–75. Medford, NJ: Learned Information Inc. for ASIS , 1992.
22.
22 Armstrong C J, Edkins J, Lonsdale R E, et al. HEINUS Higher Education Institutions Network Usage Study. Final Report to the Joint Information Systems Committee. Aberystwyth: DILS , 2001.
24 Currie W L, Willcocks L P. Analysing four types of IT sourcing decisions in the context of scale, client/supplier interdependency and risk mitigation . Information Systems Journal1998; 8: 119–143 .
25.
25 Grover V, Teng J T C, Cheon M J. Towards a theoretically-based contingency model of information systems outsourcing. In Willcocks L P, Lacity M C eds Strategic Sourcing of Information Systems 79–101. Chichester: Wiley , 1998.
26.
26 Kern T, Willcocks L. Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: theory and practice . Journal of Strategic Information Systems2000; 9(4): 321–350 .
