If the growing population of older people are to be effectively supported in their own homes, new ways of delivering care must be found. In addition, individual users of health and social services need greater empowerment and autonomy. These imperatives provide opportunities for the creative use of information and communication technology. One telecare approach that can be used to maintain or improve the quality of life for older people is the provision of health and social care information in electronic form.This paper identifies and discusses issues that contribute to the information agenda for older people. It describes the background to the present UK health strategy, most significantly the shift from institutional based care towards care at home, with the associated change of priorities within health and social care agencies. It suggests that different methods of information delivery are needed to meet the requirements of older people, and directs information providers towards the use of paper-based media and digital TV, as well as Web-based resources. It highlights the importance of user interface design and argues for an approach whereby interface design is changed when necessary, according to the results of user evaluation. Information content needs to be appropriate and managed; verification and validity of content are ensured by a continuous iterative review system.
Norris A C. The strategic support of telemedicine and telecare. Health Informatics Journal, 2001; 7(2): 81-89.
2.
Curry R G. The use of information and communication technology (ICT) in assistive technology for older and disabled people: an overview of current UK activity. Wetherby: Department of Health, 2001. www.doh.gov.uk/scg/ictolderpeople.pdf accessed 5 June 2001.
3.
Department of Health. National Service framework for older people. Wetherby: Department of Health, 2001.
4.
Department of Health. Long term care for elderly people: purchasing, providing and quality. London: HMSO, 1992.
5.
Nolan M, Grant G, Caldock K, Keady J. A framework for assessing the needs of family carers: a multidisciplinary guide. Guildford: BASE Publication in association with Rapport productions, 1994.
6.
Chambers M, Connor S. Technology as an aid to coping with caring: a usability evaluation of a telematics intervention: Proceedings of the MedInfo Conference. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2001.
7.
Brownsell S J. Are assistive technologies an enhancement to the present health, care and support mechanisms? Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Abertay, Dundee, 2000.
8.
Department of Health. The NHS plan. London: The Stationery Office, 2000. http://www.doh.gov.uk/nhsplan/npch1.htm accessed 3 June 2001
9.
Department of Health. Information for Social Care. Wetherby: Department of Health, 2000. http://www.doh.gov.uk/scg/information.htm accessed 3 June 2001
10.
Allen A, Doolittle G, Boysen C D. An analysis of the suitability of home health visits for telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare1999; 5(2): 90-96.
11.
Nolan M, Grant G, Keady J. Understanding family care: A multidimensional model of caring and coping. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996.
12.
Berthold H (ed.). D 04.1 Users needs and priorities. Project Deliverable for ACTION, DE 3001. Unpublished report. European Commission DG X111 telematics application programme, disabled and elderly sector, 1997.
13.
Emery D. Telecare in Practice: A telecare initiative focusing on carers of older people based on ACTION. Health Informatics Journal2001; 7(1): 41-48.
14.
Naisbitt J, Aburdene P. Megatrends 2000: Ten new directions for the 1990s. New York: William Morrow and Co, 1990.
15.
CareDirect. http://www.caredirect.gov.uk/ accessed 1 October 2001.
16.
NHS Direct (2001) http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/, accessed 1 October 2001.
17.
Munro J, Nicholl J, O’Caithain A, Knowles E, Morgan A. Evaluation of NHS Direct first wave sites: Final report of the phase 1 research. Sheffield: University Medical Care Research Unit, 2001.
18.
EPSRC-funded project GR/N39166/01 Interactive TV (ITV) Design network. Investigator Thimbleby H W. Middlesex University, February 2001.
19.
Gunter B. Is TV good for you? The Library Association Record2001; 103(9): 558-559.
20.
Vastag B. Easing the elderly online in search of health information. Journal of the American Medical Association2001; 285(12): 1563-1564.
21.
Bijker W E, Hughes T P, Pinch T J. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.
22.
Bijker W E, Law J. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
23.
Delamothe A. Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind (editorial). British Medical Journal2000; 321: 843-844.
24.
Eysenbach G, Diepgen T L. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. British Medical Journal1998; 317:1496-1502 (28 November).
25.
Gottlieb S. Health information on the internet is often unreliable. British Medical Journal2000; 321: 136-137 (News item 15 July).
26.
Johnston B. Exploring the new frontier: home care gets wired. Caring2000; 19(7): 6-10.
27.
Kraner M, Emery D, Cvetkovic S R, Procter P, Smythe C. Information and communication systems for the assistance of carers based on ACTION. Medical Informatics1999; 24(4): 233-248.
28.
Nielson J. Usability Engineering. Boston: AP Publishing, 1993.
29.
European Union Third Framework Programme TIDE (Telematics Intregration for Disabled and Elderly). Userfit: a practical handbook on user centred design for assistive technology. Luxembourg: European Commission, ISSC-EC-EAEC, 1996.
30.
Kirakowski J. Website analysis and measurement inventory, 1998. http://www.ucc.ie/research/hfrg/questionnaires/wammi/research.html, accessed 4 October 2000.
