Improved survival following major trauma has resulted in an increased number of patients with complex physical, functional and psychosocial needs requiring specialist multidisciplinary rehabilitation. A key challenge in modern trauma care is to deliver rehabilitation interventions that translate into improved outcomes. This study aimed to synthesise patient perceptions of recovery following major musculoskeletal trauma.
Methods
A pre-planned literature search (CINAHL, Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, and other sources) was performed 28/02/22–03/03/22 (updated 29/3/23–17/4/23 prior to submission) to capture all available qualitative or mixed methods studies describing major musculoskeletal trauma recovery from the patient perspective. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs evaluation tool and the mixed methods appraisal tool. The qualitative data was thematically analysed.
Findings
Of 5648 distinct studies, 18 studies met the criteria for inclusion totalling 637 participants. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data found that recovery following major musculoskeletal trauma has physical, psychological and socio-functional dimensions. Successful recovery involves ‘crafting a new normal’ and is both a process and an outcome. Three major themes were identified: vulnerability; learning to manage; adaptation and adjustment. Patients do not experience each theme in a linear way; instead, they move through the recovery process in an individualised and cyclical manner.
Conclusion
This review highlights the individual experience of recovery, which requires flexible and holistic care to facilitate an occupational (or socio-functional) perspective on major musculoskeletal trauma recovery. Therefore, organisationally, an effective multi-disciplinary team model of care is essential to support survival as a long-term condition.
NasrASaavedraSCollacoI, et al.The trauma golden hour: A practical guide. Cham: Springer, 2020.
4.
ThompsonLHillMShawL. Defining major trauma: A literature review. Br Paramed J2019; 4: 22–30.
5.
ThompsonLHillM, et al.Defining major trauma: A pre-hospital perspective using focus groups. Br Paramed J2019; 4: 16–23.
6.
ThompsonLHillMLeckyF, et al.Defining major trauma: A Delphi study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med2021; 29: 63.
7.
MoranCLeckyFBouamraO, et al.Advances in pre-hospital and acute trauma care have improved survival following major trauma. The Lancet2018; 2: 13–21.
8.
BridgerKKelleziBKendrickD, et al.Patient perspectives on key outcomes for vocational rehabilitation interventions following traumatic injury. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 2035.
9.
KendrickDdas NairRKelleziB, et al.Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud2021; 7: 29.
10.
KettlewellJLindleyKRadfordK, et al.Factors affecting the delivery and acceptability of the ROWTATE telehealth vocational rehabilitation intervention for traumatic injury survivors: A mixed-methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 9744.
11.
KhanFAmatyaBHoffmanK. Systematic review of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with multiple trauma. British Journal of Surgery2012; 99: 88–96.
12.
KornhaberRWiechulaRMcLeanL. The effectiveness of collaborative models of care that facilitate rehabilitation from a traumatic injury: A systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep2015; 13: 100–113.
13.
OlivePHivesLWilsonN, et al.Psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care in the United Kingdom: A scoping review of primary research. Trauma2022; 0: 1–10.
14.
RosenbloomBKhanSMcCartneyN, et al.Systematic review of persistent pain and psychological outcomes following traumatic musculoskeletal injury. J Pain Res2013; 6: 39.
15.
RivaraFMacKenzieEJurkovichG, et al.Prevalence of pain in patients 1 year after major trauma. Arc Surg2008; 143: 282–287.
16.
KendrickDDhimanPKelleziB, et al.Psychological morbidity and return to work after injury: Multicentre cohort study. Br J Gen Prac2017; 67: e555–e564.
17.
GabbeBSimpsonPHarrisonJ, et al.Return to work and functional outcomes after major trauma: Who recovers, when and how well?Ann Surg2016; 263: 623–632.
18.
HoffmanKPlayfordDGrillE, et al.Minimum data set to measure rehabilitation needs and health outcome after major trauma: Application of an international framework. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2016; 52: 331–346.
19.
RitschelMKuskeSGnassI, et al.Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: A systematic review. BMJ Open2021; 11: e050168.
20.
EkegrenCBraafBAmeratungaS, et al.Adaptation, self-motivation and support services are key to physical activity participation three to five years after major trauma: A qualitative study. J Physiother2020; 66: 188–195.
21.
ClaydonJRobinsonLAldridgeS. Patients’ perceptions of repair, rehabilitation and recovery after major orthopaedic trauma: A qualitative study. Physiotherapy2017; 103: 322–329.
22.
OgilvieRMcCloughenM, et al.The experience of surviving life-threatening injury: A qualitative synthesis. Int Nurs Rev2012; 59: 312–320.
23.
RosenbergGZionSShearerE, et al.What constitutes a ‘successful’ recovery? Patient perceptions of the recovery process after a traumatic injury. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open2020; 5: e000427.
24.
LoweJWallaceSJSamS, et al.Minimum data and core outcomes for subacute rehabilitation: A scoping review. Clin Rehabil2021; 36: 388–406.
25.
BrohiKColeEHoffmanK. Improving outcomes in early phases after major trauma. Critical Care2011; 17: 515–519.
26.
ScottJKandalaNB, et al.Embedded rehabilitation in major trauma: Retrospective pre-post observational study of service and patient outcomes. Injury2021; 52: 160–166.
27.
TongAFlemmingKMcInnesE, et al.Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol2012; 12: 81.
28.
PageMMcKenzieJBossuytP, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting. BMJ2021; 372: 71.
29.
The Trauma Audit and Research Network. Procedures Manual - England & Wales. The Author, Salford, 2021.
30.
GabbePSimpsonPSutherlandA. Improved functional outcomes for major trauma patients in a regionalized, inclusive trauma system. Ann Surg2012; 255: 1009–1015.
31.
GruenRGabbeBStelfoxH. Indicators of the quality of trauma care and the performance of trauma systems. Br J Surg2012; 99: 97–104.
32.
MurrayCVosTLozanoR, et al.Disability adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010. The Lancet2012; 380: 2197–2223.
33.
RuchholtzSMandCLewanU, et al.Regionalisation of trauma care in Germany: The “trauma network DGU®-project”. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg2012; 38: 11–17.
34.
BeerNRiffatAVolkmerB, et al.Patient perspectives of recovery after hip fracture: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Disabil Rehabil2021; 44: 6194–6209.
35.
BlackburnJYeowellG. Patients’ perceptions of rehabilitation in the community following hip fracture surgery. A qualitative thematic synthesis. Physiotherapy2020; 108: 63–75.
36.
AmesHGlentonCLewinS, et al.Clients’ perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication accessible via mobile devices for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2019 Oct 14; 10(10): CD0134472019.
37.
Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI qualitative checklist. Adelaide: The Author, 2022.
38.
HongQNPluyePFabreguesS, et al.Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT): A modified e-Delphi study. J Clin Epidemiol2019; 111: 49–59.
39.
ThomasJHardenA. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol2008; 8: 1–10.
40.
BraunVClarkeV. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exercise Health2019; 11: 589–597.
41.
NowellLNorrisJWhiteD,et al.Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods2017; 16: 1–13.
42.
ClaydonJManiatopoulosGRobinsonL,et al.Challenges experiences during rehabilitation after traumatic multiple rib fractures: A qualitative study. Disability Rehabil2018; 40(23): 2780–2789.
43.
NealP. An exploration of the experiences of wound healing in military traumatic amputees and its impact on their rehabilitation. J R Army Med Corps2015; 161: i64–i68.
44.
NightingaleJShu'anKScammellB, et al.What is important to patients who are recovering from an open tibial fracture? A qualitative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res2022; V480: 263–272.
45.
ReesSTuttonEAchtenJ, et al.Patient experience of long-term recovery after open fracture of the lower limb: a qualitative study using interviews in a community setting. BMJ Open2019; 9: e031261.
46.
TrickettRMudgeEPriceP,et al.A qualitative approach to recovery after open tibial fracture: The road to a novel, patient-derived recovery scale. Injury2012; 43: 1071–1078.
47.
TuttonEAchtenJLambS, et al.A qualitative study of patient experience of an open fracture of the lower limb during acute care. Bone Joint J2018; 100: 522–526.
OgilvieRFosterKMcCloughenA,et al.Young people's experience and self-management in the six months following major injury. Injury2015; 46: 1841–1847.
50.
OgilvieRFosterKMcCloughenA,et al.The injury trajectory for young people 16-24 years in the six months following injury: A mixed methods study. Injury2016; 47: 1966–1974.
51.
WisemanTForsterKCurtisK. The experience of emotional wellbeing for patients with physical injury: A qualitative follow up study. Injury2016; 47: 1983–1989.
52.
ShauverMAravindMChungK. A qualitative study of recovery from type III-B and III-C tibial fractures. Ann Plast Surg2011; 66: 73–79.
53.
Van HornE. Recovery from traumatic injury: Trauma patients’ perceptions of facilitators and barriers. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs2013; 17: 180–189.
54.
JamesATranVGaussT, et al.Important issues to severe trauma survivors. Ann Surg2022; 275: 189–195.
55.
BernhoffKBjorckMLarssonJ,et al.Patient experiences of life years after severe civilian lower extremity trauma with vascular injury. Eur J vac Endovasc Surg2016; 52: 690–695.
56.
YoungWGovenderPNaidooD. It was like a bad dream: Making sense of violent hand amputation and replantation in South Africa. J Hand Therapy2023; 36(1): 158–165.
57.
BakerEXyrichisANortonC, et al.The processes of hospital discharge and recovery after blunt thoracic injuries: The patient's perspective. Nurs Open2021; 00: 1–12.
58.
WallaceSBarnettABy ChengB, et al.What is ‘successful rehabilitation'? A multi-stakeholder nominal group technique study to inform rehabilitation outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil2023; 37(9): 1248–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155231157181
59.
WilcockAAHockingC. An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc, 2015.
60.
HitchDPepinG. Doing, being, becoming and belonging at the heart of occupational therapy: An analysis of theoretical ways of knowing. Scand J Occup Ther2021; 28: 13–25.
61.
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 1 2023. [Online]. Available: https://icd.who.int/dev11/l-icf/en. [Accessed 16 May 2023].
62.
VanierSLOortFJMcClimansL, et al.Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: Definition, theory and a revised model. Qual Life Res2021; 30: 3309–3322.
63.
HaldemanS. Commentary: Is patient satisfaction a reasonable outcome measure?Spine J2012; 12: 1138–1139.
64.
CatzA. Conceptual changes needed to improve outcomes in rehabilitation medicine: A clinical commentary. Neurorehabilitation2022; 51: 341–345.
65.
BhashyamARVan Der Vliet QuirineMYassineO, et al.Injury-related variation in patient-reported outcome after musculoskeletal trauma: A systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg2020; 46: 777–787.
66.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Rehabilitation after traumatic injury [NG211]. London: The Author, 2022.
67.
HaiderAHHerrera-EscobarJPAl RafiaA, et al.Factors associated with long-term outcomes after injury: results of the functional outcomes and recovery after trauma emergencies (FORTE) multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg2020; 271: 1165–1173.
68.
GillSL. Qualitative sampling methods. J Human Lactation2020; 36: 579–581.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
