Delay in clearing cervical spine injuries in obtunded trauma patients and its implications

Abstract

Introduction

Prompt recognition of cervical spine injuries may limit spinal cord damage. This prospective audit assessed the time needed to formally confirm the status of cervical spine using a computed tomography scan, the reasons for any delays, and the subsequent outcomes.

Methodology

Prospective audit analysed the data of 100 consecutive unconscious trauma patients, admitted over a seven-month period, to ascertain whether there was a ‘weekend’ effect in validating the cervical spine status radiologically, and whether the delays were associated with an increased risk of pneumonia and other complications. The sensitivity and specificity of using bony fractures and mal-alignment on the computed tomography scans to diagnose cervical spine injuries were calculated.

Results

Significant radiological evidence of cervical spine injuries occurred in 37 patients (37%). A delay in >48 h to ascertain the cervical spine status occurred in 36 patients, mostly due to logistical (58%) reasons, and this was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia requiring antibiotics (p < 0.001). A ‘weekend’ effect and presence of cervical spine injuries were not significantly related to the time to confirm the cervical spine injury status radiologically. The specificity (98%) of using bony fractures and mal-alignment on the computed tomography to diagnose cervical spine injuries was high, but its sensitivity (83.8%) was only modest.

Conclusions

A delay to confirm the cervical spine injury status was common and associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in unconscious trauma patients, particularly among those who did not sustain any cervical spine injuries. The low sensitivity of computed tomography to exclude non-bony cervical spine injuries suggests that selective early use of magnetic resonance imaging scans for high-risk unconscious trauma patients may improve patient outcomes.

Keywords

Trauma care delivery traumatic spinal injury trauma

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Milby

Halpern

Guo

et al.

Prevalence of cervical spinal injury in trauma. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25: E10–E10.

Como

Diaz

Dunham

et al.

Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma: update from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines committee. J Trauma 2009; 67: 651–659.

Ball

Watson

. A 12 month clinical audit of cervical spine imaging in multiple injured and intubated patients. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: 257–260.

Hoffman

Wolfson

Todd

et al.

Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med 1998; 32: 461–469.

Hoffman

Mower

Wolfson

et al.

The validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 94–99.

Panacek

Mower

Holmes

et al.

Test performance of the individual NEXUS low-risk clinical screening criteria for cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 22–25.

Stiell

Wells

Vandemheen

et al.

The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001; 286: 1841–1848.

Stiell

Clement

McKnight

et al.

The Canadian C- spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2510–2518.

Hanson

Blackmore

Mann

et al.

Cervical spine injury: a clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 713–717.

10.

Blackmore

Ramsey

Mann

et al.

Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost- effectiveness analysis. Radiology 1999; 212: 117–125.

11.

Anderson

Gugala

Lindsey

et al.

Clearing the cervical spine in the blunt trauma patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18: 149–159.

12.

Como

Diaz

Dunham

et al.

13.

American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria on suspected spine trauma, www.acr.org (2012, accessed 1 June 2017).

14.

Bell RM. Professor of Surgery, University of South Carolina, Chairman ATLS Clearing the cervical spine. ICU Registrar Manual.

15.

Lien

Jacques

Powell

. Cervical spine clearance in Australian intensive care units. Crit Care Resusc 2003; 5: 91–96.

16.

Kokabi

Raper

DMS

Xing

et al.

Application of imaging guidelines in patients with suspected cervical spine trauma: retrospective analysis and literature review. Emerg Radiol 2011; 18: 31–38.

17.

D’Alise

Benzel

Hart

. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the cervical spine in the comatose or obtunded trauma patient. J Neurosurg 1999; 91: 54–59.

18.

Benzel

Hart

Ball

et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of patients with an occult cervical spine injury. J Neurosurg 1996; 85: 824–829.

19.

Patman

Jenkins

Stiller

. Physiotherapy does not prevent, or hasten recovery from, ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with acquired brain injury. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 258–265.