Abstract
Interventional radiology (IR) has much to offer in the treatment of the trauma patient and should be integral in multidisciplinary trauma management. Many minimally invasive endovascular techniques are available with a vast amount of evidence to support their successful application. These techniques are both safe and effective and can in many circumstances negate further trauma caused by surgery in this high risk group. IR should not necessarily be considered a direct replacement for surgery as the two can often be synergistic in providing optimal care to many trauma patients. Despite the body of evidence and wealth of experience, IR is often overlooked or thought of late in trauma management when therapies are less effective. This article explores the role of IR and reviews the techniques and evidence behind their use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
