Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aim:

To identify evidence for the minimum annual case load of open repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysms compatible with an acceptable perioperative mortality rate.

Method:

A PubMed search resulted in 137 references, sixteen articles with original data on volume and mortality not older than ten years were identified and selected for review

Result:

Three studies found no volume-mortality relationship when controlled for age, sex and medical risk. Six studies verified volume thresholds of 20 procedures per year or more. In seven studies hospital volumes of 7–17 elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs per year were sufficient to reach a mortality rate of a national average or similar to that of higher volume centres. No studies were published on the minimum annual case-load of EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVA R), or of a combination of EVAR and open repair.

Conclusion:

Recent studies in North America and in Europe indicate that 10–15 procedures annually can be sufficient to safely perform open AAA repairs. Centres regularly performing less should consider referral. Continuous monitoring and audit of risk-adjusted perioperative mortality rates should be practiced in all centres.

Keywords

Volume-outcome relationship abdominal aortic aneurysm volume-mortality in aneurysm repairs threshold values for outcome perioperative mortality volume-mortality relationship

References

Luft

Bunker

Enthoven

: Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. New Engl J Med 1979;301:1364–1369.

Manheim

Sohn

Feinglass

Ujiki

Parker

Pearce

: Hospital vascular surgery volume and procedure mortality rates in California, 1982–1994. J Vasc Surg 1998;28(1): 45–56; discussion 56–58.

Sollano

Gelijns

Moskowitz

Heitjan

Cullinane

Saha

Chen

Roohan

Reemtsma

Shields

: Volume-outcome relationships in cardiovascular operations: New York State, 1990–1995. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117(3): 419–428; discussion 428–430.

Dardik

Lin

Gordon

Williams

Perler

: Results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the 1990s: A population-based analysis of 2335 cases. J Vasc Surg 1999;30(6):985–995.

Dimick

Stanley

Axelrod

Kazmers

Henke

Jacobs

Wakefield

Greenfield

Upchurch

Jr : Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the United States: Impact of hospital volume, gender, and age. Ann Surg 2002;235(4):579–585.

Birkmeyer

Siewers

Finlayson

Stukel

Lucas

Batista

Welch

Wennberg

: Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N N Engl J Med 2002;346(15):1128–1137.

Christian

Gustafson

Betensky

Daley

Zinner

: The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers. Ann Surg 2003;238(4): 447–455; discussion 455–457.

Dimick

Cowan

Jr Stanley

Henke

Pronovost

Upchurch

Jr : Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States. J Vasc Surg 2003;38(4):739–444.

Dimick

Pronovost

Cowan

Jr Wainess

Upchurch

Jr : Should older patients be selectively referred to high-volume centers for abdominal aortic surgery? Vascular 2004;12(1):51–56.

10.

Birkmeyer

Dimick

Staiger

: Operative mortality and procedure volume as predictors of subsequent hospital performance. Ann Surg 2006;243(3):411–417.

11.

Allareddy

Konety

: Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association. Ann Surg 2007;246(1):135–139.

12.

Khuri

Daley

Henderson

Hur

Hossain

Soybel

Kizer

Aust

Bell

Jr Chong

Demakis

Fabri

Gibbs

Grover

Hammermeister

McDonald

Passaro

Jr Phillips

Scamman

Spencer

Stremple

: Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations; Results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 1999;230(3):414–429.

13.

Dueck

Kucey

Johnston

Alter

Laupacis

: Longterm survival and temporal trends in patient and surgeon factors after elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg 2004;39(6):1261–1267.

14.

Urbach

Baxter

: Does it matter what a hospital is “high volume” for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: Analysis of administrative data. BMJ 2004;328(7442):737–740.

15.

Jibawi

Hanafy

Guy

: Is there a minimum caseload that achieves acceptable operative mortality in abdominal aortic aneurysm operations? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;32(3):273–276.

16.

Holt

Poloniecki

Loftus

Michaels

Thompson

: Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005. Br J Surg 2007;94(4):441–448.

17.

Eckstein

Bruckner

Heider

Wolf

Hanke

Niedermeier

Noppeney

Umscheid

Wenk

: The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German hospitals. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;34(3):260–266.

18.

Birkmeyer

Stukel

Siewers

Goodney

Wennberg

Lucas

: Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117–2127.

19.

Wanhainen

Bylund

Björck

: Outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Sweden 1994–2005. Br J Surg 2008;95:564–570.

20.

Khuri

: Invited commentary. Surgeons, not General Motors, should set standards for surgical care. Surgery 2001;130(3):429–431.

21.

Spiegelhalter

: Mortality and volume of cases in paediatric cardiac surgery: retrospective study based on routinely collected data BMJ 2001;323:1–5.

22.

Holt

PJE

Poloniecki

Loftus

Thompson

: Demonstrating safety through in-hospital mortality analysis following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in England. Br J Surg 2008;95:64–71.

Volume versus Outcome When Treating Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Electively — Is There Evidence to Centralise?

Abstract

Aim:

Method:

Result:

Conclusion:

Keywords

References