FarrowJHCurrent concepts in the detection and treatment of the earliest of the early breast cancers. Cancer1970;25:468–477.
2.
MillisRRThynneGSIn situ intraduct carcinoma of the breast: A long term follow-up study. Br J Surg1975;62:957–962.
3.
WestbrookKCGallagerHSIntraductal carcinoma of the breast. A comparative study. Am J Surg1975; 130: 667–670.
4.
AshikariRHuvosAGSnyderREProspective study of non infiltrating carcinoma of the breast. Cancer1977;39:435–439.
5.
SunshineJAMoseleyHSFletcherWSKrippaehneWWBreast carcinoma in situ. A retrospective review of 112 cases with a minimum 10 year follow-up. Am J Surg1985; 150: 44–51.
6.
CiattoSBonardiRCataliottiLCardonaGIntraductal breast carcinoma. Review of a multicenter series of 350 cases. Coordinating Center and Writing Committee of FONCAM (National Task Force for Breast Cancer), Italy. Tumori1990; 76: 552–554.
7.
SilversteinMJWaismanJRGamagamiP.: Intraductal carcinoma of the breast (208 cases). Clinical factors influencing treatment choice. Cancer1990; 66: 102–108.
8.
AlpersCEWellingsSRThe prevalence of carcinoma in situ in normal and cancer-associated breasts. Hum Pathol1985;16:796–807.
9.
NielsenMAutopsy studies of the occurrence of cancerous, atypical and benign epithelial lesions in the female breast. APMIS Suppl1989;10:1–56.
10.
BhathalPSBrownRWLesueurGCRussellISFrequency of benign and malignant breast lesions in 207 consecutive autopsies in Australian women. Br J Cancer1985;51(2):271–8.
11.
EusebiVFeudaleEFoschiniMP.: Long-term follow-up of in situ carcinoma of the breast. Semin Diagn Pathol1994;11:223–235.
12.
PageDLDupontWDRogersLWJensenRASchuylerPAContinued local recurrence of carcinoma 15–25 years after diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy. Cancer1995;76:1197–1200.
13.
RosenPPBraunDWJrKinneDEThe clinical significance of pre-invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer1980;46:919–925.
14.
LewisDGeschickterCFComedocarcinoma of the breast. Arch Surg1938;36:225–244.
15.
ShapiroSColemanEABroedersMCoddMde KoningHFracheboudJMossSPaciEStachenkoSBallard-BarbashRBreast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: Current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Epidemiol1998; 27: 735–742.
16.
ColletteHJDayNERombachJJDe WaardFEvaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet1984;1:1224–1226.
17.
VerbeekALHendriksJHHollandRMravunacMSturmansFDayNEReduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975–1981). Lancet1984; 1: 1222–1224.
18.
FrisellJGlasUHellstromLSomellARandomized mammographic screening for breast cancer in Stockholm. Design, first round results and comparisons. Breast Cancer Res Treat1986; 8: 45–54.
19.
AnderssonIAspegrenKJanzonLMammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: The Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ1988;297:943–948.
20.
TabarLFagerbergCJGadA.: Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet1985; 1: 829–832.
21.
FracheboudJde KoningHJBeemsterboerPM.: Nationwide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: Results of initial and subsequent screening 1990–1995). National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer1998; 75: 694–698.
22.
LeviFTeVCRandimbisonLLa VecchiaCTrends of in situ carcinoma of the breast in Vaud, Switzerland. Eur J Cancer1997;33:903–906.
23.
BarchielliAPaciEGiorgiDRecent trends of in situ carcinoma of the breast and mammographic screening in the Florence area, Italy. Cancer Causes Control1999;10:313–317.
24.
VoogdACCrommelinMARepelaer Van DrielOJNolthenius-PuylaertTutein MCBJEvan der HeydenLHCoeberghJWWTrends in incidentie en behandelbeleid van ductaal carcinoma in situ van de mamma in Zuidoost-Nederland. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd2000;144:659–663.
25.
ErnsterVLBarclayJKerlikowskeKGradyDHendersonCIncidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA1996;275:913–918.
26.
Adams-CameronMGillilandFDHuntWCKeyCRTrends in incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico, 1973–1994). Cancer1999; 85: 1084–1090.
27.
JulienJPBijkerNFentimanIS.: Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: First results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet2000; 355: 528–533.
28.
VerkooijenHMPeetersPHBuskensEKootVCBorelRinkes IHMaliWPvan VroonhovenTDiagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: A meta-analysis. Br J Cancer2000;82:1017–21.
29.
VerkooijenHMBorelRinkes IHPeetersPHLandheerMLvan EsNJMaliWPKlinkenbijlJHVan VroonhovenTJThe COBRA Study Group. Impact of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy on diagnosis and surgical treatment of nonpalpable breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol2001 Apr; 27(3):244–9.
30.
O'HigginsNLinosDABlichert-ToftM.: European Guidelines for quality assurance in the surgical management of mammographically detected lesions. European Breast Cancer Working Group. Eur J Surg Oncol1998; 24: 96–98.
31.
PerryNOn behalf of the EUSOMA Working Party. Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. Eur J Cancer2001; 37: 159–172.
32.
DixonJMRavisekarOCunninghamMAndersonEDAndersonTJBrownHKFactors affecting outcome of patients with impalpable breast cancer detected by breast screening. Br J Surg1996;83:997–1001.
33.
BijkerNPeterseJLDuchateauLJulienJPFentimanISDuvalCDi PalmaSSimony-LafontaineJDe MascarelIVan de VijverMJRisk factors and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ; analysis of EORTC trial 10853. J. Clin Oncol2001; 19: 2263–71.
34.
RutgersEJThFor the EUSOMA Consensus Group. Quality control in the loco-regional treatment of breast cancer. Eur Cancer2001; 37: 447–453.
35.
Van DongenJAFentimanISHarrisJRHollandRPeterseJLSalvadoriBStewartHJIn-situ breast cancer: The EORTC consensus meeting. Lancet1989;8653:25–27.
36.
SilversteinMJLagiosMDGroshenSWaismanJRLewinskyBSMartinoSGamagamiPColburnWJThe influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med1999;340:1455–1461.
37.
SchwartzGFGuilianoAEVeronesiUThe Consensus Conference Committee. Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymphnode biopsy and carcinoma of the breast. April 19–22, 2001Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer2002: 2542–2551.
38.
SchwartzGFSolinLJOlivottoIAErnsterVLPressmanPIConsensus conference on the treatment of in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast. April 22–25, 1999. Cancer2000; 88: 946–954.
39.
FisherBDignamJWolmarkN.: Lumpectomy and radi-ationtherapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: Findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol1998;16:441–452.
40.
FisherBDignamJWolmarkN.: Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Breast and Bowel Project B-24. Randomised controlled trial. Lancet1999; 353: 1993–2000.