The advent of new technologies has precipitated a swift proliferation of digitalization within the manufacturing sector, giving rise to novel conceptualizations. The present study is concerned with the topic of predictive maintenance. The advent of the Digital Twin (DT) approach has led to a notable rise in prominence for predictive maintenance. In order to perform predictive maintenance in an effective manner, it is of paramount importance to predict potential failures in advance. In this study, a dataset comprising five distinct failure classes, determined based on factors such as air temperature, process temperature, rotational speed, torque, and tool wear, is considered. While previous studies have primarily focused on machine learning (ML) algorithms, this study makes a distinctive contribution to the field by employing automated machine learning (AutoML) libraries. The objective of AutoML libraries is to autonomize ML algorithms in order to obtain optimal results. Despite their recent use in a number of studies, they have not yet gained widespread acceptance. In this study, three open-source libraries of the Python programming language, namely AutoSklearn, AutoKeras, and PyCaret, will be employed for data analysis and comparison of the resulting outputs. A systematic comparison will be conducted to identify the most suitable algorithm. Additionally, this study aims to utilise a hyperparameter optimisation approach, which will enhance the prevalence and applicability of predictive maintenance studies. This study contributes to the advancement of predictive maintenance applications.
Association for Computing Machinery. (2013). Special interest group on management of data and association for computing machinery. special interest group on knowledge discovery & data mining. In KDD ‘13: the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: August 11-14, 2013, ACM Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
D'UrsoD.ChiacchioF.CavalieriS.GambadoroS.KhodayeeS. M. (2024). Predictive maintenance of standalone steel industrial components powered by a Dynamic Reliability Digital Twin model with Artificial Intelligence. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 243, 109859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109859
4.
EinabadiB.BaboliA.EbrahimiM. (2019). Dynamic Predictive Maintenance in industry 4.0 based on real time information: Case study in automotive industries. In IFAC-PapersOnLine (pp. 1069–1074). Elsevier B.V.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.337
5.
FerreiraL.PilastriA.RomanoF.CortezP. (2022). Using supervised and one-class automated machine learning for predictive maintenance. Applied Soft Computing, 131, 109820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109820
6.
FerreiraL.PilastriA.SousaV.RomanoF.CortezP. (2021). Prediction of maintenance equipment failures using automated machine learning. In International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (pp. 259–267). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91608-4_26
7.
FeurerM.KleinA.JostK. E.SpringenbergT.BlumM.HutterF.Efficient and Robust Automated Machine Learning. [Online]. Available: http://automl.org.
8.
GainU.HottiV. (2021). Low-code AutoML-augmented data pipeline – A review and experiments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1828(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1828/1/012015
9.
HadiR. H.HadyH. N.HasanA. M.Al-JodahA.HumaidiA. J. (2023). Improved fault classification for predictive maintenance in industrial IoT based on AutoML: A case study of ball-bearing faults. Processes, 11(5), 1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051507
10.
HutterF.HoosH. H.Leyton-BrownK.“LNCS 6683 - Sequential Model-Based Optimization for General Algorithm Configuration”.
11.
HutterF.KotthoffL.VanschorenJ.“The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning Automated Machine Learning Methods, Systems, Challenges.” [Online]. Available: http://www.springer.com/series/15602.
12.
IqbalF. B.BiswasS.UrbaR. (2021). Performance analysis of intrusion detection systems using the PyCaret machine learning library on the UNSW-NB15 dataset (Doctoral dissertation, Brac University).
13.
JiangY.DaiP.FangP.ZhongR. Y.CaoX. (2022). Electrical-STGCN: An electrical spatio-temporal graph convolutional network for intelligent predictive maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(12), 8509–8518. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3143148
14.
KohaviR.JohnG. H. (1995). Automatic parameter selection by minimizing estimated error. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 1995 (pp. 304–312). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-55860-377-6.50045-1
15.
Larocque-VilliersJ.DumondP.KnoxD. (2021). Automating predictive maintenance using state-based transfer learning and ensemble methods. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROSE52750.2021.9611768
LloydJ. R.DuvenaudD.GrosseR.TenenbaumJ. B.GhahramaniZ. (2014). “Automatic Construction and Natural-Language Description of Nonparametric Regression Models,” 2014. [Online]. Available: www.aaai.org.
18.
MeddaouiA.HainM.HachmoudA. (2023). The benefits of predictive maintenance in manufacturing excellence: A case study to establish reliable methods for predicting failures. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 128, 3685–3690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12086-6
19.
MohammedN. A.AbdulateefO. F.HamadA. H. (2023). An IoT and machine learning-based predictive maintenance system for electrical motors. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 56(4), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.560414
20.
OlsonR. S.BartleyN.UrbanowiczR. J.MooreJ. H. (2016). Evaluation of a tree-based pipeline optimization tool for automating data science. In GECCO 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, Jul. 2016 (pp. 485–492). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/2908812.2908918
21.
ÖzdemirŞ.ÖrslüS. (2019). New Perspective on Machine Learning Process: AutoML. Journal of Information Systems and Management Research,1(1), 23-29.
22.
ParkJ.OhJ. (2023). A machine learning based predictive maintenance algorithm for ship generator engines using engine simulations and collected ship data. Energy, 285, 129269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129269
RivasJ.Boya-LaraC.PovedaH. (2022). Partial discharge detection in power lines using automated machine learning. In 2022 8th International Engineering, Sciences and Technology Conference (IESTEC) (pp. 223–230). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IESTEC54539.2022.00041
25.
SalemK.AbdelGwadE.KoutaH. (2023). Predicting forced blower failures using machine learning algorithms and vibration data for effective maintenance strategies. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 23(5), 2191–2203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-023-01765-x
26.
SalimK.HebriR. S. A.BesmaS. (2023). Classification predictive maintenance using XGboost with genetic algorithm. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 36(6), 833. https://doi.org/10.18280/ria.360603
27.
SarangpureN.DhamdeV.RogeA.DoyeJ.PatleS.TamboliS. (2023). Automating the machine learning process using PyCaret and Streamlit. In 2023 2nd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
28.
ShaheenB.KocsisÁNémethI. (2023). Data-driven failure prediction and RUL estimation of mechanical components using accumulative artificial neural networks. Eng Appl Artif Intell, 119, 105749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105749
29.
SihombingD. J. C.DexiusJ. U.ManurungJ.AritonangM.AdinataH. S. (2022). Design and analysis of automated machine learning (automl) in powerbi application using pycaret. In 2022 International Conference of Science and Information Technology in Smart Administration (ICSINTESA) (pp. 89–94). IEEE.
30.
SuawaP.MeiselT.JongmannsM.HuebnerM.ReichenbachM. (2022). Modeling and fault detection of brushless direct current motor by deep learning sensor data fusion. Sensors, 22(9), 3516. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093516
31.
TornedeT.TornedeA.WeverM.HüllermeierE. (2021). Coevolution of remaining useful lifetime estimation pipelines for automated predictive maintenance. In Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference (pp. 368–376). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3449639.3459395
32.
TruongA.WaltersA.GoodsittJ.HinesK.BrussC. B.FarivarR. (2019). Towards automated machine learning: Evaluation and comparison of AutoML approaches and tools. In Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI (pp. 1471–1479). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2019.00209
33.
ZhuC.ShaoS. (2023). Optoelectronic sensor fault detection based predictive maintenance smart industry 4.0 using machine learning techniques. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 55(13), 1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05410-7
34.
ZulfauziI. A.DahlanN. Y.SintuyaH.SetthapunW. (2023). Anomaly detection using K-Means and long-short term memory for predictive maintenance of large-scale solar (LSS) photovoltaic plant. Energy Reports, 9, 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.159
