This article suggests a new perspective on the political signification of riots, using the 2011 England riots as a case. The sociological literature tends to look for the political signification of riots in the riots themselves. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s notion of the dispositive, the article develops a new approach that analyses the optical grids in which riots are made visible as objects for thought and action that can be either political or apolitical. By analysing the case of the 2011 England riots, the article shows how the dispositives that made the riots visible make it possible to ascribe a both obscure and radical political signification to the riots. The article opens up a new line of inquiry about the relation between riots and politics, and allows us to reconsider the political signification of riots.
AgambenG. (2009) What Is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AkramS. (2014) ‘Recognizing the 2011 United Kingdom Riots as Political Protest: A Theoretical Framework Based on Agency, Habitus and the Preconscious’, British Journal of Criminology54(3): 375–92.
3.
BadiouA. (2012) The Rebirth of History: Times of Riots and Uprisings. London: Verso
DeleuzeG. (1992) ‘What Is a Dispositif?’, pp. 159–68 in ArmstrongT.J. (ed.) Michel Foucault: Philosopher. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
12.
Della PortaD.GbipkiB. (2012) ‘The Riots: A Dynamic View’, pp. 87–102 in SeferiadesS.JohnstonH. (eds) Violent Protest, Contentious Politics, and the Neoliberal State. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
FordingR. (2001) ‘The Political Response to Black Insurgency: A Critical Test of Competing Theories of the State’, American Political Science Review95(1): 115–30.
15.
FoucaultM (1980) ‘The Confession of the Flesh’, in GordonC. (ed.) Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books, 194–228.
16.
FoucaultM (2000) ‘Useless to Revolt?’, pp. 449–53 in FabionJ. (ed.) Power. New York: The New Press.
17.
FoucaultM (2003) Society Must Be Defended. New York: Picador.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GibbsGR (2013) ‘Using Software in Qualitative Analysis’, pp. 277–95 in FlickU. (ed.) Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage.
21.
HallS.WinlowS. (2014) ‘The English Riots of 2011: Misreading the Signs on the Road to the Society of Enemies’, pp. 98–114 in PritchardD.PakesF. (eds) Riot, Unrest and Protest on the Global Stage. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
HarveyD. (2012) Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
HörnqvistM. (2016) ‘Riots in the Welfare State: The Contours of a Modern-day Moral Economy’, European Journal of Criminology13(5): 573–89.
27.
JeffersonT. (1990) The Case against Paramilitary Policing. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
28.
KingM. (2013) ‘Birmingham Revisited – Causal Differences between the Riots of 2011 and 2005?’, Policing & Society23(1): 26–45.
29.
KingM.WaddingtonD. (2005) ‘Flashpoints Revisited: A Critical Application to the Policing of Anti-globalization Protest’, Policing & Society15(3): 255–82.
30.
KraskaP.B. (2007) ‘Militarization and Policing – Its Relevance to 21st-century Police’, Policing1(4): 501–13.
31.
McPhailC.SchweingruberD.McCarthyJ. (1998) ‘Policing Protest in the United States: 1960–1995’, pp. 49–69 in della PortaD.ReiterH. (eds) Policing Protest. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
MarchartO. (2007) Post-foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou, and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
33.
MarchartO. (2018) Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
34.
MarxG. (1970) ‘Issueless Riots’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science391(1): 21–33.
35.
MilesM.B.HubermanM.SaldanaJ. (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. London: Sage.
36.
MillingtonG. (2016) ‘“I Found the Truth in Foot Locker”: London 2011, Urban Culture, and the Post-political City’, Antipode48(3): 705–23.
37.
MitchellD.StaeheliL.A. (2005) ‘Permitting Protest: Parsing the Fine Geography of Dissent in America’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29(4): 796–813.
38.
MorgnerC. (2018) ‘The Relational Meaning-making of Riots: Narrative Logic and Network Performance of the London “Riots”’, pp. 579–600 in DepelteauF. (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
MouffeC. (2005) The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
NewburnT. (2015) ‘The 2011 England Riots in Recent Historical Perspective’, British Journal of Criminology55(1): 39–64.
42.
NewburnT. (2016) ‘The 2011 England Riots in European Context: A Framework for Understanding the “Life-cycle” of Riots’, European Journal of Criminology13(5): 540–55.
43.
NewburnT.CooperK.DeaconR.DiskiR. (2015) ‘Shopping for Free? Looting, Consumerism and the 2011 Riots’, British Journal of Criminology55(5): 987–1004.
44.
NewburnT.DeaconR.DiskiB.CooperK.GrantM.BurchA. (2018a) ‘“The Best Three Days of My Life”: Pleasure, Power and Alienation in the 2011 Riots’, Crime, Media, Culture14(1): 41–59.
45.
NewburnT.DiskiR.CooperK.DeaconR.BurchA.GrantM. (2018b) ‘“The Biggest Gang”? Police and People in the 2011 England Riots’, Policing and Society28(2): 205–22.
46.
NewburnT.JonesT.BlausteinJ. (2018c) ‘Framing the 2011 England Riots: Understanding the Political and Policy Response’, The Howard Journal57(3): 339–62.
47.
OliverP. (2008) ‘Repression and Crime Control: Why Social Movement Scholars Should Pay Attention to Mass Incarceration as a Form of Repression’, Mobilization13(1): 1–24.
48.
OsborneT.RoseN. (1999) ‘Governing Cities: Notes on the Spatialisation of Virtue’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17(6): 737–60.
PivenF.ClowardR. (1979) Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed and How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.
51.
PivenF.ClowardR. (1992) ‘Normalizing Collective Protest’, pp. 301–25 in MorrisA.MuellerC. (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
PivenF.ClowardR. (1993) Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage Books.
53.
RaffnsøeS.Gudmand-HøyerM.ThaningM.S. (2016) ‘Foucault’s Dispositive: The Perspicacity of Dispositive Analytics in Organizational Research’, Organization23(2): 272–98.
RoseN. (1996) ‘The Death of the Social? Re-figuring the Territory of Government’, Economy and Society25(3): 327–56.
57.
SaldañaJ. (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
58.
SchmittC. (2005) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Sokhi-BulleyB. (2016) ‘Re-reading the Riots: Counter-conduct in London 2011’, Global Society30(2): 320–39.
60.
ThörnH.MayerM.ThörnC. (2016) ‘Re-thinking Urban Social Movements, “Riots” and Uprisings: An Introduction’, pp. 3–55 in MayerM.ThörnC.ThörnH. (eds) Urban Uprisings: Challenging Neoliberal Urbanism in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
TillyC. (1995) Popular Contention in Great Britain 1750–1834. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
62.
TillyC. (2003) The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
TreadwellJ.BriggsD.WinlowS.HallS. (2013) ‘Shopocalypse Now: Consumer Culture and the English riots of 2011’, British Journal of Criminology53(1): 1–17.
