Rural places around the world share common issues related to their positioning outside social, political, and economic centres of power. More than simply tyranny of distance, many issues can be attributed to tyranny at distance: that is, the power of distant decision-makers to direct rural development from afar with little knowledge of rural contexts. In response to the challenge to progress a transformative research agenda for rural sociology, this article theorises a ‘cross-boundary’ approach to research for rural development, to address persisting issues of development ignorance. Cross-boundary knowledge production values the multiple, contextualised knowledges of rural people and brings these into dialogue with academic knowledges across disciplines to inform practical rural solutions. Rural sociologists, with their in-depth understanding of rural community dynamics and larger social structures, are ideally positioned to broker cross-boundary knowledge partnerships that equip rural communities to solve old problems in new ways.
AdamskiT.GorlochK. (2007) ‘Neo-endogenous Development and the Revalidation of Local Knowledge’, Polish Sociological Review4(160): 481–97.
2.
AllisonJ.EversoleR. (2008) ‘A New Direction for Regional University Campuses: Catalysing Innovation in Place’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research21(2): 95–109.
3.
AnnisS.HakimP. (1988) Direct to the Poor, Grassroots Development in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
4.
ApostolopoulosN.ChalvatzisK.J.LiargovasP.G.NewberyR.RokouE. (2020) ‘The Role of the Expert Knowledge Broker in Rural Development: Renewable Energy Funding Decisions in Greece’, Journal of Rural Studies78: 96–106.
5.
BarnesB. (1977) Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
6.
BierschenkT.ChauveauJ.-P.Olivier de SardanJ.-P. (2002) ‘Local Development Brokers in Africa: The Rise of a New Social Category’, Working Paper #13. Mainz, Germany: Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität.
7.
BoothD. (1994) Rethinking Social Development: Theory, Research and Practice. Harlow: Longman.
8.
BrokenshaD.WarrenD.M.WernerO. (1980) Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
9.
BurnheimCHarveyA. (2016) ‘Far from the Studying Crowd? Regional and Remote Students in Higher Education’, in HarveyA, et al. (eds) Student Equity in Australian Higher Education. Singapore: Springer.
10.
CerneaM. (1991) Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Development Projects, 2nd edn.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
ChambersR. (1983) Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Harlow: Pearson Education.
12.
CheshireL. (2006) Governing Rural Development: Discourses and Practices of Self-help in Australian Rural Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
13.
CookeB.KothariU. (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny?London: Zed Books.
14.
CornwallA. (2011) The Participation Reader. London: Zed Books.
15.
CostamagnaP. (2015) Política y formación en el desarrollo territorial. San Sebastian: Fundación Deusto.
16.
Craig.D.PorterD. (1997) ‘Framing Participation: Development Projects, Professionals, and Organizations’, Development in Practice7(3): 229–36.
17.
CraigG.MayoM.PoppleK.ShawM.TaylorM. (2011) The Community Development Reader: History, Themes and Issues. Bristol: Policy Press.
18.
CummingsS.KiwanukaS.GillmanH.RegeerB. (2019) ‘The Future of Knowledge Brokering: Perspectives from a Generational Framework of Knowledge Management for International Development’, Information Development35(5): 781–94.
19.
DukeC.OsborneM.WilsonB. (2013) A New Imperative: Regions and Higher Education in Difficult Times. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
20.
EscobarA. (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
EversoleR. (2015) Knowledge Partnering for Community Development. New York: Routledge.
22.
EversoleR. (2016) Regional Development in Australia: Being Regional. London: Routledge.
23.
EversoleR. (2018a) Anthropology for Development: From Theory to Practice. London: Routledge.
24.
EversoleR. (2018b) ‘Towards an Anthropology of Local and Regional Development Practice’, Human Organization77(4): 336–46.
25.
EversoleR.McCallT. (2014) ‘Constructing Advantage in the Cradle Coast Region, Tasmania’, Regional Science Policy and Practice6(3): 251–64.
26.
Fals-BordaO.RahmanM.A. (1991) Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York: Apex Press.
27.
FarrugiaD. (2014) ‘Towards a Spatialised Youth Sociology: The Rural and the Urban in Times of Change’, Journal of Youth Studies17(3): 293–307.
28.
FrankH.LandstromH. (2016) ‘What Makes Entrepreneurship Research Interesting? Reflections on Strategies to Overcome the Rigour–Relevance Gap’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development28(1–2): 51–75.
29.
GarlickS.PryorG. (2002) Universities and Their Communities: Creating Regional Development through Knowledge-based Engagement. Canberra: Department of Transport and Regional Services.
30.
GonzalezN.L. (1972) ‘Patron–client Relationships at the International Level’, in StrickonA.GreenfieldS.M. (eds) Structure and Process in Latin America: Patronage, Clientage, and Power Systems. Albuquerque, NM: School for Advanced Research Press/SAR Press.
31.
GrayI.LawrenceG. (2001) A Future for Regional Australia: Escaping Global Misfortune. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
GreenwoodD.J.LevinM. (2007) Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Research Methods.
33.
GrilloR.D.StirratR.L (1997) Discourses of Development: Anthropological Perspectives. Oxford: Berg.
34.
GunasekaraC. (2006) ‘Leading the Horses to Water: The Dilemmas of Academics and University Managers in Regional Engagement’, Journal of Sociology42(2): 145–63.
35.
HobartM. (1993) An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. New York: Routledge.
36.
IRD (2011) Institute for Regional Development Review: Supporting Regional Innovation and Development through Teaching and Research. Burnie, Tasmania: Institute for Regional Development.
37.
JakimowT. (2013) ‘Spoiling the Situation: Reflections on the Development and Research Field’, Development in Practice23(1): 21–32.
38.
JasanoffS.MarkleG.E.PetersenJ.C.PinchT.J. (1995) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London: Sage.
39.
KarlsenJ.LarreaM. (2015) Desarrollo territorial e investigación acción: Innovación a través del dialogo. San Sebastián: Instituto Vasco de Competitividad – Fundación Deusto.
40.
KieserA.LeinerL. (2009) ‘Why the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research is Unbridgeable’, Journal of Management Studies46(3): 516–33.
41.
LongN. (2000) Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. London: Routledge.
42.
LowePPhillipsonJ.ProctorA.GkartziosM. (2019) ‘Expertise in Rural Development: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis’, World Development116: 28–37.
43.
MorganK. (2007) ‘The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal’, in RuttenR.BoekemaF. (eds) The Learning Region: Foundations, State of the Art, Future. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
44.
MosseD. (2005) Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press.
45.
MosseD.LewisD. (2006) ‘Introduction: Theoretical Approaches to Brokerage and Translation in Development’, in LewisD.MosseD. (eds) Development Brokers and Translators: The Ethnography of Aid and Agencies. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
46.
MunckR.McIlrathL.HallB.TandonR. (2014) Higher Education and Community-based Research: Creating a Global Vision. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
NordbergK.Å.MariussenS.VirkkalaS. (2020) ‘Community-driven Social Innovation and Quadruple Helix Coordination in Rural Development: Case Study on LEADER group Aktion Osterbotten’, Journal of Rural Studies79:157–68.
48.
OECD (2006) The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. Report. Paris: OECD.
49.
Olivier de SardanJ.-P. (2005) Anthropology and Development: Understanding Contemporary Social Change. London: Zed Books.
50.
Parliament of Australia (2020) Inquiry into the Indicators of, and Impact of, Regional Inequality in Australia: Final Report. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
PritchardB.McManusP. (2000) Land of Discontent: The Dynamics of Change in Rural and Regional Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.
53.
QureshiI.SutterC.BhattB. (2018) ‘The Transformative Power of Knowledge Sharing in Settings of Poverty and Social Inequality’, Organization Studies39(11): 1575–99.
54.
ScottJ. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
ShucksmithM. (2010) ‘Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo-endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-shaping in Diffused Power Contexts’, Sociologia Ruralis50(1): 1–14.
56.
ShucksmithM.BrownD.L. (2019) Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. New York: Routledge.
57.
SillitoeP.BickerA.PottierJ. (2002) Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge. ASA Monographs 39. New York: Routledge.
58.
tebrakunna country, LeeE.EvansJ. (eds) (in press) Indigenous Women: Honouring 20 Years since Linda Tuwihai Smith’s Decolonizing Methodologies. London: Bloomsbury.
59.
TittertonM.EversoleR.LyallJ. (2011) ‘The Use of Knowledge Partnering as an Extension Strategy in Adaptation to Climate Variability’, Extension Farming Systems Journal7(2): 1–6.
60.
Tuhiwai SmithL. (1999) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
61.
UTN (Universidad Tecnológica Nacional) (2021) ‘PRAXIS: Instituto de Investigaciones’, Rafaela, Argentina: UTN, URL (consulted March 2021): http://mdt.frra.utn.edu.ar/web/
62.
van der PloegJ.D.RentingH. (2000) ‘Impact and Potential: A Comparative Review of European Rural Development Practices’, Sociologia Ruralis40(4): 529–43.
63.
van der PloegJ.D.RentingH.BrunoriG.KnickelK.MannionJ.MarsdenT., et al. (2000) ‘Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory’, Sociologia Ruralis40(4): 391–408.
64.
Vergara RojasP. (2010) Centros de pensamiento estratégico territorial: Instrumentos de la gobernanza regional en Chile. Santiago: Subsecretaría de Desarrollo Regional y Administrativo – SUBDERE.
65.
WesternJ.S. (1975) ‘The Problem of Development and the Role of Sociology’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology11(1): 55–9.
66.
WiseG. (2016) How Regional Universities Drive Regional Innovation. Canberra: Department of Industry, Innovation and Science.
67.
YoungN. (2019) ‘Responding to Rural Change: Adaptation, Resilience and Community Action’, ch. 53 in ShucksmithM.BrownD.L. (eds) Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. New York: Routledge.
