This article examines the adoption of threshold learning outcomes (TLOs) for academic disciplines in Australia as an example of institutional isomorphism. It is argued that the type of sociology embedded in the TLOs values the sociology of the metropole and that, while the TLOs are broad enough to allow for individual sociology departments to continue to teach their own version of sociology, they further institutionalise the norm that sociology is about metropolitan theory and methods. Nevertheless, these isomorphic processes may serve to positively legitimise and institutionalise sociology, potentially enhancing the discipline’s position in higher education.
ALTC (Australian Learning and Teaching Council) (2010c) ‘Doc #5 Recommended Process for Disciplines Establishing Threshold Learning Outcomes (TLOs)’, Canberra: ALTC.
4.
ALTC (Australian Learning and Teaching Council) (2010d) ‘Doc #2 Diagrammatic Outline of Standard-setting and Assurance Issues’, Canberra: ALTC.
5.
Australian Qualifications Framework Council (2013) Australian Qualifications Framework. Canberra: Australian Qualifications Framework Council.
6.
ConnellRaewyn (2005) ‘Australia and World Sociology’, pp. 3–27 in GermovJohnMcGeeTara Renae (eds) Histories of Australian Sociology. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W. (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organisational Fields’, American Sociological Review48(2): 147–60.
9.
DuinaFrancesco (2011) Institutions and the Economy. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (2005) Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
HarleyKirsten (2005) ‘Disciplining Australian Sociology? Charting a History of Theory Use in Sociology’, pp. 343–54 in GermovJohnMcGeeTara Renae (eds) Histories of Australian Sociology. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
13.
HarleyKirsten (2012) ‘Sociology’s Objects, Objectivity and Objectives: Successes and Failures in Establishing the Discipline in America, England and Australia before 1945’, Journal of Sociology48(4): 410–26.
14.
MarginsonSimon (2004) ‘National and Global Competition in Higher Education’, The Australian Educational Researcher31(2): 1–28.
15.
MarginsonSimon (2006) ‘Dynamics of National and Global Competition in Higher Education’, Higher Education52: 1–39.
16.
MarshallHelenRobinsonPeterGermovJohnClarkEileen (2009) Teaching Sociology in Australia: A Report to the Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Canberra: ALTC. URL (consulted September 2013): http://apo.org.au/research/teaching-sociology-australia
17.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian (1977) ‘Institutionalised Organisations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–63.
