Protecting participants – especially the vulnerable and/or young – is essential to respecting individuals and doing so upholds the merit and integrity of research. Research is a way of improving the lives of the vulnerable as research informs policy and service provision. Research participants need to be protected, but as their right, they also need to be able to participate in research as a way of being heard on matters which affect them. This article argues that ethical review of research is so heavily focused on minimising risk that young people’s right to participate in discussion is often overlooked. I use my own research with young people who have experienced problematic substance use as a running case study to discuss the tension between balancing protection and participation in research design and offer strategies for balancing the two when designing research.
BarrattM. J.NormanJ.S.FryC.L. (2006) ‘Positive and Negative Aspects of Participation in Illicit Drug Research: Implications for Recruitment and Ethical Conduct’, International Journal of Drug Policy18: 235–8.
2.
BealsF. (2012) ‘Moving Beyond the Academic Doors: Addressing Ethical Issues in NGO Youth Research’, Youth Studies Australia31(3): 35–42.
3.
BessantJ. (2006) ‘The Fixed Age Rule: Young People, Consent and Research Ethics’, Youth Studies Australia25(4): 50–7.
4.
BillettP. (2012) ‘Lessons from the Field: Ethics in Youth Social Capital Research’, Youth Studies Australia31(3): 43–50.
5.
Carroll-LindJ.ChapmanJ.W.GregoryJ.MaxwellG. (2006) ‘The Key to Gatekeepers: Passive Consent and Other Ethical Issues Surrounding the Rights of Children to Speak on Issues that Concern Them’, Child Abuse & Neglect30(9): 979–89.
6.
ChristensenP.ProutA. (2002) ‘Working with Ethical Symmetry in Social Research with Children’, Childhood9(4): 477–97.
7.
ClokeP.CookeP.CursonsJ.MilbourneP.WiddowfieldR. (2000) ‘Ethics, Reflexivity, and Research: Encounters with Homeless People’, Ethics, Place and Environment3(2): 133–54.
8.
DaleyK. (2009) ‘The Ethics of Doing Research with Young Drug Users’, in LockieS.BissellD.GreigA.HynesM.MarshD.SahaL.. (eds) The Future of Sociology: Refereed Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Australian Sociological Associations. Australian National University, 1–4 December.
9.
DaleyK. (2012) ‘Gathering Sensitive Stories: Using Care Theory to Guide Ethical Decision-making in Research Interviews with Young People’, Youth Studies Australia31(3): 27–34.
10.
DuncanR.E.DrewS.HodgsonJ.SawyerS.M. (2009) ‘Is My Mum Going to Hear This? Methodological and Ethical Challenges in Qualitative Health Research with Young People’, Social Science & Medicine69: 1691–9.
11.
ElyB.ColemanC. (2007) ‘Recruitment and Retention of Children in Longitudinal Research’, Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing12(3): 199–202.
12.
FisherE. (2009) ‘The Moral Consequences of Studying the Vulnerable: Court Mandated Reporting and Beyond’, Narrative Inquiry19(1): 18–34.
13.
GroverS. (2004) ‘Why Won’t They Listen to Us? On Giving Power and Voice to Children Participating in Social Research’, Childhood11(1): 81–93.
14.
Haudrup ChristensenP. (2004) ‘Children’s Participation in Ethnographic Research: Issues of Power and Representation’, Children and Society18: 165–76.
15.
Inter-Agency Working Group on Children’s Participation (IAWGCP) (2007) Children’s Participation in Decision Making: Why Do It, When to Do It, How to Do It. Bangkok: IAWGCP.
16.
KellehearA. (1989) ‘Ethics and Social Research’, in PerryJ. (ed.) Doing Fieldwork: Eight Personal Accounts of Social Research. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
17.
KingN.M.P.ChurchillL.R. (2000) ‘Ethical Principles Guiding Research on Child and Adolescent Subjects’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence15(7): 710–24.
18.
MatthewsH. (2001) ‘Power Games and Moral Territories: Ethical Dilemmas When Working with Children and Young People’, Ethics, Place and Environment4(2): 117–18.
19.
MishnaF.AntleB.J.RegehrC. (2004) ‘Tapping the Perspectives of Children: Emerging Ethical Issues in Qualitative Research’, Qualitative Social Work3(4): 449–68.
20.
NHMRC, ARC and AVCC (National Health Medical Research Centre, Australian Research Council Australian Vice Chancellors’ Committee) (2007) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra: Australian Government.
21.
NewmanJ. (2005) ‘Protection through Participation: Young People Affected by Forced Migration and Political Crisis’, RSC Working Paper No. 20. Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford.
22.
RenoldE.HollandS.RossN.J.HillmanA. (2008) ‘“Becoming Participant’: Problematizing “Informed Consent” in Participatory Research with Young People in Care’, Qualitative Social Work7(4): 427–47.
23.
RunyanD. (2000) ‘The Ethical, Legal and Methodological Implications of Directly Asking Children about Abuse’, Journal of Interpersonal Volence15(7): 675–81.
24.
SeearK.McLeanK. (2008) ‘Breaking the Silence: The Role of Emotional Labour in Qualitative Research’, refereed paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Sociological Association, 4–5 December, University of Melbourne.
25.
SeymourK. (2012) ‘Using Incentives: Encouraging and Recognising Participation in Youth Research’, Youth Studies Australia31(3): 51–9.
26.
StuartG. (2001) ‘Are You Old Enough? Research Ethics and Young People’, Youth Studies Australia20(4): 34–9.
27.
te RieleK.BrooksR. (2012) ‘Making Ethical Deliberations Public: Some Provisional Resources for Youth Research Ethics’, Youth Studies Australia31(3): 11–16.
28.
TierneyW.G.Blumberg CorwinZ. (2007) ‘The Tensions between Academic Freedom and Institutional Review Boards’, Qualitative Inquiry13(3): 388–98.
WilesR.CrowC.CharliesV.HeathS. (2007) ‘Informed Consent and the Research Process: Following the Rules or Striking Balances’, Sociological Research Online12(2). URL (consulted 26 September 2012): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/2/wiles.html
31.
YoungL.BarrettH. (2001) ‘Ethics and Participation: Reflections in Research with Street Children’, Ethics, Policy & Environment4(2): 130–4.
