This article discusses joint management in Kakadu National Park, Australia’s biggest and arguably most complex protected area, where the policy is devised to allow sharing of power between the state and the area’s traditional Aboriginal owners. Although power is shared, this happens in a clumsy and difficult-to-understand way, confusing a divided group of actors. Most of them are convinced that most power lies with the other group and that they themselves are powerless to deal with contesting forms of cultural capital. In arguing this position I show how structure and habitus have become entrenched in one domain of the park’s management but radically changed in another.
ALRC (1974) Aboriginal Land Rights Commission: Second Report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
2.
BourdieuP. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. NiceR.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BourdieuP. (1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
BourdieuP. (2002) ‘Habitus’, pp 27–34 in HillierJ.RooksbyE. (eds.) Habitus: A Sense of Place. Aldershot: Ashgate.
5.
BourdieuP.WacquantL.J.D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
Commonwealth of Australia (1977) Uranium – Australia’s decision. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
7.
de LacyT.LawsonB. (1997) ‘The Uluru/Kakadu Model: Joint Management of Aboriginal-owned National Parks in Australia’, pp 155–88 in StevensS. (ed.) Conservation through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington, DC and Covelo, CA: Island Press.
8.
EaglesP.F.J.McCoolS.F.HaynesC.D. (2002) Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas: Guidelines for Planning and Management. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN, UNEP and WTO.
9.
FoxA. (1983) ‘Kakadu is Aboriginal Land’, Ambio12: 161–6.
10.
GalvinM.HallerT. (eds) (2008) People, Protected Areas and Global Change: Participatory Conservation in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe. Bern, Switzerland: NCCR North-South.
11.
GoffmanE. (1971) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Allen Lane.
12.
GoffmanE. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
HansenT.B.StepputatF. (2001) ‘Introduction: States of Imagination’, pp. 1–38 in HansenT.B.StepputatF. (eds) States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
HaynesC. (2009) ‘Defined by Contradiction: The Social Construction of Joint Management in Kakadu National Park’, PhD thesis, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT.
15.
HaynesC. (2010) ‘Realities, Simulacra and the Appropriation of Aboriginality in Kakadu’s Tourism’, pp. 165–85 in KeenI. (ed.) Indigenous Participation in Australian Economies: Historical and Anthropological Perspectives. Canberra: ANU E Press.
16.
HeatleyA. (1990) Almost Australians: The Politics of Northern Territory Self-government. Darwin: Australian National University North Australian Research Unit.
17.
LarrittC.S. (1995) ‘Taking Part in Mutawintji: Aboriginal Involvement in Mootwingee National Park’, Australian Geographical Studies33: 242–56.
18.
LawrenceD. (2000) Kakadu: The Making of a National Park. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
19.
LewisH.T. (1989) ‘Ecological and Technological Knowledge of Fire: Aborigines versus Park Rangers in Northern Australia’, American Anthropologist91: 940–61.
20.
NadasdyP. (2005) ‘The Anti-politics of TEK: The Institutionalization of Co-management Discourse and Practice’, Anthropologica47: 215–32.
21.
NTRB (1972) Notes on a Proposal for a National Park in the Alligator River Area of the Far North of the Northern Territory. Darwin: Northern Territory Reserves Board.
22.
RobinsonC.J.SmythD.WhiteheadP.J. (2005) ‘Bush Tucker, Bush Pets, and Bush Threats: Cooperative Management of Feral Animals in Australia’s Kakadu National Park’, Conservation Biology19: 1385–91.
23.
RossA.Pickering ShermanK.SnodgrassJ.G.DelcoreH.D.ShermanR. (2011) Indigenous Peoples and the Collaborative Stewardship of Nature: Knowledge Binds and Institutional Conflicts. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
24.
RUEI (1977) Ranger Uranium Environmental Inquiry: Second Report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
25.
StevensS. (1997) ‘The Legacy of Yellowstone’, pp. 13–32 in StevensS. (ed.) Conservation through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington, DC and Covelo, CA: Island Press.
26.
SullivanP. (2005) ‘Searching for the Intercultural, Searching for the Culture’, Oceania75: 183–94.
27.
TatzC. (1982) Aborigines & Uranium and Other Essays. Richmond, Vic.: Heinemann Educational Australia.
28.
ToyneP. (1994) The Reluctant Nation: Environment, Law and Politics in Australia. Sydney: ABC Books.
29.
WeaverS. (1991) ‘The Role of Aboriginals in Management of Australia’s Coburg (Gurig) and Kakadu National Parks’, pp. 311–33 in WestP.C.BrechinS.R. (eds) Resident Peoples and National Parks. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
30.
WeberM. (1991) ‘Class, Status, Party’, pp 180–95 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH.H.Wright MillsC.London: Routledge.
31.
WeberM. (1968) Economy and Society, vol. 3. New York: Bedminster.
32.
WestP.IgoeJ.BrockingtonD. (2006) ‘Parks and Peoples: The Social Impact of Protected Areas’, Annual Review of Anthropology35: 251–77.
