Abstract
Inglehart is well known for his master role in the World Values Surveys, as well for his interpretation of the data. His conceptualization of the shifts of top value priorities in the world is widely accepted. This article uses Singapore as an empirical case to test the adequacy of his conception. The result partially appears not in his favor. Clarifying this problem can help improve on designs and interpretations of future World Values Surveys; it should also be helpful for developing more sophistication in cultural research in general.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
