Should there be legislative control of chemical air contaminants in the office environment that imposes lower concentration limits for offices than for industry? As the two affected populations are essentially similar, it is conclud ed that there is no justification for legislatively binding different limits which are health based. There is a case for the control of chemical air contaminants in offices which is based on economic (mainly productivity) grounds at a lower level than the health-based ones, but this should be by improved guidance being available rather than by legislation.
Raw GJ: Sick Building Syndrome: A Review of the Evidence on Causes and Solutions. HSE Contract Research Report No 42/1992. Londond, HMSO, 1992.
2.
Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. WHO European Series No 23 . Copenhagen, WHO, 1987.
3.
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: Threshold Limit Values. Cincinnati, ACGIH, published annually.
4.
ASHRAE Standard 62-1989: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. Atlanta, ASHRAE, 1989.
5.
Berglund B., Brunekreef B., Knöppel H., Lindvall T., Maroni M., Mølhave L.: Effects of indoor air pollution on human health. Indoor Air1992;2:2-25.
6.
Lunau FW: The perception of indoor air quality ; in Leslie GB, Lunau FW (eds): Indoor Air Pollution: Problems and Priorities. Cambridge , Cambridge University Press, 1992 , pp 9-18.
7.
Axelrad R.: Economic implications of indoor air quality and its regulation and control. CCMS Report No 16. NATO/CCMS Workshop. CCMS, 1989.
