The performance of three heating systems with respect to thermal comfort based on data collected over two heating seasons in a three-storey building was measured. The systems were compared according to the thermal comfort as well as local thermal discomfort parameters. In terms of global thermal com fort, all systems performed similarly; however, in terms of their ability to dis tribute heat to a room and their performance with respect to local thermal discomfort, all three systems performed differently.
ASHRAE Standard 55-81: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta, ASHRAE, 1981.
2.
Moderate ThermalEnvironments - Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort. Geneva, ISO7730-1984.
3.
Kahkonen E., Ilmarinen R.: Indoor thermal climate in shops and stores. Proc 4th Int Conf on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Berlin , August, 1987.
4.
Nelson TM, Nilsson TH, Hopkins GW: Thermal comfort: Advantages and disadvantages. ASHRAE Trans1987;93/1.
5.
Wyon DP: The effects of moderate heat stress on typewriting performance. Ergonomics1974; 17:309-318.
6.
Fanger PO: Thermal Comfort, Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering . Toronto, MacGraw-Hill, 1972.
7.
Fanger PO: Future research needs concerning the human response to indoor environments . ASHRAE Trans1978;84:760-764.
8.
Auger M.: Experimental Comparison of Three Heating Systems with respect to Heat Distribution and Thermal Comfort; M Eng thesis, Concordia University , 1990.
