The global drive for net-zero carbon emissions has made zero-carbon buildings an essential goal, with modular construction emerging as a key strategy to achieve this. This research examines how modular construction can contribute to zero-carbon building objectives, specifically focusing on healthcare buildings. The Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) modular building project at St George's University Hospital serves as a case study, assessing the carbon footprint across various lifecycle stages and evaluating its performance according to Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) standards. The study demonstrates that modular construction reduces carbon emissions through energy-efficient designs, the use of low-carbon materials, and optimized resource utilization in the production phase. Waste reduction during manufacturing, shortened assembly time, and the use of renewable energy further contribute to minimizing operational emissions. Additionally, the modular design facilitates future reuse and re-cycling of components during deconstruction. While high initial capital costs remain a challenge, the benefits of modular construction in terms of energy efficiency, sustainable material use, waste management and ecological considerations make it a promising solution. The research concludes with practical recommendations for policymakers, urban planners, and construction professionals to promote modular construction as a pathway to near-zero carbon building development.
ChenLHuangZPanWSuRKLZhongYZhangY. Low carbon concrete for prefabricated modular construction in circular economy: an integrated approach towards sustainability, durability, cost, and mechanical performances of article. J Build Eng2024; 90: 109368.
2.
YunW. Modular construction and evaluation of green building technology system based on LEED of article. J Chem Pharm Res2014; 6: 2904–2913.
3.
Al-NajjarADodooA. Modular multi-storey construction with cross-laminated timber: life cycle environmental implications of article. Wood Mater Sci Eng2023; 18: 525–539.
4.
KamaliMHewageK. Life cycle performance of modular buildings: a critical review of article. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2016; 62: 1171–1183.
5.
SilvaBVFHolm-NielsenJBSadrizadehSTelesMPRKiani-MoghaddamMArabkoohsarA. Sustainable, green, or smart? Pathways for energy-efficient healthcare buildings of article. Sustainable Cities Soc2024; 100: 105013.
6.
von DrachenfelsNHusmannJKhalidUCerdasFHerrmannC. Life cycle assessment of the battery cell production: using a modular material and energy flow model to assess product and process innovations of article. Energy Technol2023; 11: 2200673.
7.
FerdousWBaiYTuan DucNManaloAMendisP. New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings – A state-of-the-art review of article. Eng Struct2019; 183: 883–893.
8.
LuoXZhengXLiaoCXiaoYDengCLiuSChenQ. Research on the modular design method and application of prefabricated residential buildings of article. Buildings2024; 14: 3014.
9.
LiuQMaYChenLPedryczWSkibniewskiMJChenZ-S. Artificial intelligence for production, operations and logistics management in modular construction industry: a systematic literature review of article. Inf Fusion2024; 109: 102423.
10.
KentMHuynhNKSchiavonSSelkowitzS. Using support vector machine to detect desk illuminance sensor blockage for closed-loop daylight harvesting of article. Energy Build2022; 274: 112443.
11.
CarlessTSGriffinWMFischbeckPS. The environmental competitiveness of small modular reactors: a life cycle study of article. Energy2016; 114: 84–99.
12.
JayawardanaJSandanayakeMKulatungaAKJayasingheJASCZhangGOsadithSAU. Evaluating the circular economy potential of modular construction in developing economies — A life cycle assessment of article. Sustainability2023; 15: 16336.
13.
Antwi-AfariPNgSTChenJOluleyeBIAntwi-AfariMFAbabioBK. Enhancing life cycle assessment for circular economy measurement of different case scenarios of modular steel slab of article. Build Environ2023; 239: 110411.
14.
CarriveauREdrisyACadieuxPMaillouxR. Ice adhesion issues in renewable energy infrastructure. J Adhes Sci Technol2012; 26: 447–461.
15.
KimSOsmondP. Analyzing green building rating tools for healthcare buildings from the building user's perspective of article. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 757–766.
16.
KamaliMHewageKMilaniAS. Life cycle sustainability performance assessment framework for residential modular buildings: aggregated sustainability indices of article. Build Environ2018; 138: 21–41.
17.
LvY. Development and comparison of built environment assessment system of article. Int J Appl Environ Sci2013; 8: 157–166.
18.
MistryV. Briefing: BREEAM – making what is important measurable of article. Proce Inst Civil Eng: Eng Sustainab2007; 160: 11–14.
19.
SegaraSLiQJGallottaAWangYGoslingJRezguiY. Taxonomy of circularity indicators for the built environment: integrating circularity through the Royal Institute of British architects (RIBA) plan of work of article. J Cleaner Prod2024; 446: 141429.
20.
DubljevićSTepavčevićBStefanovićAAnđelkovićAS. BIM To BREEAM: a workflow for automated daylighting assessment of existing buildings of article. Energy Build2024; 312: 114208.
21.
SeinreEKurnitskiJVollH. Building sustainability objective assessment in Estonian context and a comparative evaluation with LEED and BREEAM of article. Build Environ2014; 82: 110–120.
22.
AnsahMKChenXYangHLuLLamPTI. Developing an automated BIM-based life cycle assessment approach for modularly designed high-rise buildings of article. Environ Impact Assess Rev2021; 90: 106618.
23.
FaludiJLepechMDLoisosG. Using life cycle assessment methods to guide architectural decision-making for sustainable prefabricated modular buildings of article. J Green Build2012; 7: 151–170.
24.
SatolaDKristiansenABHoulihan-WibergAGustavsenAMaTWangRZ. Comparative life cycle assessment of various energy efficiency designs of a container-based housing unit in China: a case study of article. Build Environ2020; 186: 107358.
25.
AlshamraniOS. Integrated LCA-LCC assessment model of offsite, onsite, and conventional construction systems of article. J Asian Architect Build Eng2022; 21: 2058–2080.
26.
SpinksM. Understanding and actioning BRE environmental assessment method: a socio-technical approach of article. Local Environ2015; 20: 131–148.
27.
ReedTJCloustonPLHoqueSFisettePR. An analysis of leed and breeam assessment methods for educational institutions of article. J Green Build2010; 5: 132–154.
28.
SchweberLHarogluH. Comparing the fit between BREEAM assessment and design processes of article. Build Res Inform2014; 42: 300–317.
29.
PonterossoPGaterellMWilliamsJ. Post occupancy evaluation and internal environmental monitoring of the new BREEAM “Excellent” Land Rover/Ben Ainslie Racing team headquarters offices of article. Build Environ2018; 146: 133–142.
30.
MihalakakouGSouliotisMPapadakiMMenounouPDimopoulosPKolokotsaDParavantisJATsangrassoulisAPanarasGGiannakopoulosEPapaefthimiouS. Green roofs as a nature-based solution for improving urban sustainability: progress and perspectives of article. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2023; 180: 113306.
31.
FaulconbridgeJYalcinerS. Local variants of mobile sustainable building assessment models: the marketization and constrained mutation of BREEAM ES of article. Global Networks2015; 15: 360–378.
32.
NajiSGwilliamJ. The potentials of BREEAM communities in addressing the adaptive governance in theory and practice of article. Environ, Dev Sustainab2022; 24: 8287–8312.
33.
LiTEssahEAWuYChengYLiaoC. Numerical comparison of exhaled particle dispersion under different air distributions for winter heating of article. Sustain Cities Soc2023; 89: 104342.
34.
PanYGuoKLinC-HWeiDHoK-FChenC. Developing a survival probability-based Lagrangian model for predicting ultraviolet disinfection of bioaerosols in enclosed environments of article. Build Environ2023; 244: 110765.
35.
BurraKRGLiuXWangZLiJCheDGuptaAK. Quantifying the sources of synergistic effects in co-pyrolysis of pinewood and polystyrene of article. Appl Energy2021; 302: 117562.
36.
Paredes-VergaraMPalma-BehnkeRHaasJ. Characterizing decision making under deep uncertainty for model-based energy transitions of article. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2024; 192: 114233.
37.
SadatnyaASadeghiNSabzekarSKhanjaniMTakANTaghaddosH. Machine learning for construction crew productivity prediction using daily work reports of article. Autom Constr2023; 152: 104891.
38.
GrodzkaEMSolbiatiC. The problem of assessing the sustainability of adapted historic buildings with BREEAM certification using examples in Poland and Great Britain of article. Int J Sustain Eng2023; 16: 140–154.
39.
MaqboolRThompsonCAshfaqS. LEED And BREEAM green building certification systems as possible game changers in attaining low-cost energy-efficient urban housing projects of article. J Urban Plann Dev2023; 149: 04023024.
40.
FlintMMBakerJWBillington. A modular framework for performance-based durability engineering: From exposure to impacts. Struct Saf2014; 50: 78–93.
41.
Serrano-BaenaMMTriviño-TarradasPRuiz-DíazCFernándezREH. Implications of BREEAM sustainability assessment on the design of hotels of article. Sustainability2020; 12: 6550.
42.
LiuGHuangRLiKShresthaAFuX. Greenhouse gas emissions management in prefabrication and modular construction based on earned value management of article. J Constr Eng Manag2022; 148: 04022034.
43.
WangJHanXMaoJLiW. Design and practice of prefabricated zero energy building in cold plateau area of article. Energy Build2021; 251: 111332.
44.
KorolEShushunovaN. Analysis and valuation of the energy-efficient residential building with innovative modular green wall systems of article. Sustainability2022; 14: 6891.
