WilsonEO. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
2.
KahnPH. Technological nature: adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2011.
3.
SogaMGastonKJ. Global synthesis reveals heterogeneous changes in connection of humans to nature. One Earth2023; 6: 131–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.01.007.
4.
PerwenisPSzewrańskiS. Spatial planning for reducing the epidemic risk – the state of knowledge and practice from the perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Water Land Dev. 2022; 56–69. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2022.143721.
5.
HeoSDesaiMULoweSRBellML. Impact of changed use of greenspace during COVID-19 pandemic on depression and anxiety. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2021; 18(11): 5842. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115842.
6.
RoostaMGholamiAShahvaranF. COVID-19 and cities: a systematic review of early urban studies. Cities Health2024; 8: 272–287. DOI: 10.1080/23748834.2023.2215413.
7.
KiełkowskaJTokarczyk-DorociakKKazakJSzewrańskiSvan HoofJ. Urban adaptation to climate change plans and policies - the conceptual framework of a methodological approach. J Ecol Eng2018; 19: 50–62. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/81658.
8.
MrówczynskaMSkibaMLeśniakABazan-KrzywoszańskaAJanowiecFSztubeckaMGrechRKazakJSkibaM. A new fuzzy model of multi-criteria decision support based on Bayesian networks for the urban areas’ decarbonization planning. Energy Convers Manag2022; 268: 116035. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116035.
9.
SzopińskaEKazakJKempaORubaszekJ. Spatial form of greenery in strategic environmental management in the context of urban adaptation to climate change. Pol J Environ Stud2019; 28(4): 2845–2856. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/92244.
10.
LeeSKimY. A framework of biophilic urbanism for improving climate change adaptability in urban environments. Urban For Urban Green2021; 61: 127104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127104.
11.
LeeE-JParkS-J. Biophilic experience-based residential hybrid framework. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2022; 19(14): 8512. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148512.
12.
ShepleyMSachsNSadatsafaviHFournierCPedittoK. The impact of green space on violent crime in urban environments: an evidence synthesis. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2019; 16(24): 5119. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16245119.
13.
LisAZalewskaKPardelaŁAdamczakECenarskaABławickaKBrzegowaBMatiiukA. How the amount of greenery in city parks impacts visitor preferences in the context of naturalness, legibility and perceived danger. Landsc Urban Plann2022; 228: 104556. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104556.
14.
YildirimMGocerOGlobaABrambillaA. Investigating restorative effects of biophilic design in workplaces: a systematic review. Intell Build Int2023; 15: 205–247. DOI: 10.1080/17508975.2024.2306273.
15.
Ríos-RodríguezMLTesta MorenoMMoreno-JiménezP. Nature in the office: a systematic review of nature elements and their effects on worker stress response. Healthcare2023; 11(21): 2838. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11212838.
16.
AbdelaalMSSoebartoV. History matters: the origins of biophilic design of innovative learning spaces in traditional architecture. ArchNet-IJAR2018; 12: 108–127. DOI: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1655.
17.
ChenYYueWLa RosaD. Which communities have better accessibility to green space? an investigation into environmental inequality using big data. Landsc Urban Plann2020; 204: 103919. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103919.
18.
SzkopieckaAWyrwaJPChrobakGKołodyńskaISzewrańskiS. Perceived restorative potential of urban parks by citizens—a case study from Wrocław, Poland. Sustainability2023; 15(10): 7912. DOI: 10.3390/su15107912.
19.
SztubeckaMSkibaMMrówczyńskaMBazan-KrzywoszańskaA. Various presentation of noise perception in Bydgoszcz green areas. Archit Civ Eng Environ2019; 12: 113–120. DOI: 10.21307/acee-2019-041.
20.
FrancisRAChadwickMA. Urban invasions: non-native and invasive species in cities. Geography2015; 100: 144–151. DOI: 10.1080/00167487.2015.12093969.
21.
MeenarMHeckertMAdlakhaD. “Green enough ain’t good enough:” public perceptions and emotions related to green infrastructure in environmental justice communities. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2022; 19(3): 1448. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031448.
22.
McGeeBParkN-K. Colour, light, and materiality: biophilic interior design presence in research and practice. Intry2022; 5(1): 27–52. DOI: 10.7454/in.v5i1.189.