SiRLinYYXiaoZPYeY. Spatio-temporal analysis of built environment and street vitality relation-ship based on street-level imagery: a case study of Futian district, Shenzhen. Geog Sci2021; 41(9): 10. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.09.005.
7.
ChenFLudwigCSykesO. Heritage conservation through planning: a comparison of policies and principles in England and China. Plan Pract Res2021; 36(5): 578–601. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1752472.
8.
SwensenG. Tensions between urban heritage policy and compact city planning – a practice review. Plan Pract Res2020; 35(5): 555–574. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1804182.
9.
LiuLLSunYLiJZhangYLWangL. Research review on living heritage and its conservation approaches. City Plan Rev. 2022; 5: 046. doi:10.11819/cpr20220506a
10.
NiccolucciFFelicettiAHermonS. Populating the data space for cultural heritage with heritage digital twins. Data2022; 7(8): 105. DOI: 10.3390/data7080105.
ArmisRKanegaeH. The attractiveness of a post-mining city as a tourist destination from the perspective of visitors: a study of Sawahlunto old coal mining town in Indonesia. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci2020; 4: 443–461. DOI: 10.1007/s41685-019-00137-4
14.
ŠtrbaĽ. Analysis of Criteria Affecting Geosite Visits by General Public: a Case of Slovak (Geo)Tourists. Geoheritage2019; 11: 291–300. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-018-0283-2
15.
Della CorteVAriaMDel GaudioG. Smart, open, user innovation and competitive advantage: a model for museums and heritage sites. Mus Manag Curatorship2017; 32(1): 50–79. DOI: 10.1080/09647775.2016.1247380.
16.
García-AlmeidaDJGartnerWC. Model konkurentnosti u turističkim destinacijama nematerijalne kulturne baštine sa stajališta temeljenog na znanju. Acta turistic2021; 33(1): 7–37. DOI: 10.22598/at/2021.33.1.7.
17.
ArfaFHZijlstraHLubelliBQuistW. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: from a literature review to a model of practice. Hist Env-Policy Pract2022; 13(2): 148–170. DOI: 10.1080/17567505.2022.2058551.
18.
CoombesMAVilesHA. Integrating nature-based solutions and the conservation of urban built heritage: challenges, opportunities, and prospects. Urban For Urban Green2021; 63: 127192. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127192.
19.
SesanaEGagnonASBertolinCHughesJ. Adapting cultural heritage to climate change risks: perspectives of cultural heritage experts in Europe. Geosciences2018; 8(8): 305. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8080305.
20.
ZhangWBaiSSZhangQShiRLWangHCLiuYCNiTJWuYYaoZYSunYWangMY. Physalin B reduces Aβ secretion through down-regulation of BACE1 expression by activating FoxO1 and inhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation. Chin J Nat Med2021; 19(6): 732–740. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20908920.
21.
CheWCaoZShiYYuCW. Renewal and upgrading of a courtyard building in the historic and cultural district of Beijing: design concept of ‘multiple coexistence’ and a case study. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(2): 522–536. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211010359.
22.
ParsaeeMDemersCMHébertMLalondeJFPotvinAHébertMLalondeJFPotvinA. Biophilic, photobiological and energy-efficient design framework of adaptive building façades for Northern Canada. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(5): 665–691. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20903082
23.
PiselloALCastaldoVLPiselliCCotanaF. Coupling artworks preservation constraints with visitors’ environmental satisfaction: results from an indoor microclimate assessment procedure in a historical museum building in central Italy. Indoor Built Environ2018; 27(6): 846–869. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X17694422.
24.
LiuJJXinTS. The adaptation and rehabilitation techniques of the modern architectural heritage. Appl Mech Mater2011; 71: 4454–4459. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.71-78.4454
25.
HaqSBerhieG. Space syntax investigation of Lubbock, a grid-like American city and some insights into isotropic layouts. J Urban Des2018; 23(1): 5–22. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2017.1369872.
26.
WangFLiJYuFHeHZhenF. Space, function, and vitality in historic areas: the tourismification process and spatial order of Shichahai in Beijing. Int J Tour Res2018; 129(3): 335–344. DOI: 10.1002/jtr.2185.
27.
WuJLuYGaoHWangM. Cultivating historical heritage area vitality using urban morphology approach based on big data and machine learning. Comput Environ Urban Syst2022; 91: 101716. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101716.
28.
WhitehandJWGuKWhitehandSMZhangJ. Urban morphology and conservation in China. Cities2011; 28(2): 171–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2010.12.001.
29.
WangM. Polycentric urban development and urban amenities: evidence from Chinese cities. Env Plan B-Urban Anal City Sci2021; 48(3): 400–416. DOI: 10.1177/2399808320951205.
30.
KarayaziSSDaneGVriesBD. Utilizing urban geospatial data to understand heritage attractiveness in Amsterdam. ISPRS Int J Geoinf2021; 10(4): 198. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10040198.
31.
WangFHeJJiangCLiY. Evolution of the commercial blocks in ancient Beijing city from the street network perspective. J Geogr Sci2018; 28: 845–868. DOI: 10.1007/s11442-018-1509-6.
32.
WangFZhaoXGQiuYXLuoJ. Adaptability of traditional villages as tourist destinations in Yellow River Basin, China. Indoor Built Environ2023; 32(3): 574–589. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X221126056.
33.
SunJWYiSC. Comprehensive Carrying Capacity Evaluation and Spatial-Temporal Differentiation of Cities in the Grand Canal Cultural Belt. Econ Geogr2020; 40(7): 12–21. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.07.002.
34.
StebbinsRA. Cultural tourism as serious leisure. Ann Tour Res1996; 23(4): 948–950. DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(96)00028-X.
35.
NyaupaneGPAndereckKL. Visitors to cultural heritage attractions: An activity-based integrated typology. Tour Cult Commun2014; 14(1): 17–26. DOI: 10.3727/109830414X14038917832824.
36.
RamiresABrandaoFSousaAC. Motivation-based cluster analysis of international tourists visiting a World Heritage City: the case of Porto, Portugal. J Destin Mark Manag2018; 8: 49–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.12.001.
37.
SuDNNguyenNANNguyenQNTTranTP. The link between travel motivation and satisfaction towards a heritage destination: the role of visitor engagement, visitor experience and heritage destination image. Tour Manag Perspect2020; 34: 100634. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100634.
38.
YangXZhaoYZhaoJShiCDengB. Tourists’ perceived attitudes toward the famous terraced agricultural cultural heritage landscape in China. Agriculture2022; 12(9): 1394. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12091394.
39.
LeiJSuntrayuthS. A study on the impact of Chinese domestic tourists’ participation on their post-travel behaviors in traditional Chinese villages. Heritage2023; 6(7): 5187–5201. DOI: 10.3390/heritage6070275.