Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-3
Development of an indoor environment evaluation model for heating,ventilation and air-conditioning control system of office buildings in subtropical region considering indoor health and thermal comfort
Office occupants spend most of their time in an enclosed indoor environment, controlled by heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems especially in subtropical regions owing to the hot and humid climate. A reasonable indoor environment evaluation model is necessary to achieve the reliable control of HVAC systems that satisfies the occupants’ health and comfort needs. However, traditional HVAC systems are controlled based on a simple index that does not consider the synthesis of indoor air quality, thermal comfort and occupant preferences. In this paper, we develop a comprehensive evaluation model that encompasses these three aspects based on field survey. Field surveys were conducted to investigate indoor environmental conditions and preferences of the occupants. Collected data were then verified for model hypothesis rationality and reviewed to identify weighting factors using Pearson and regression analysis. Results showed that these parameters had significant correlations without noticeable collinearity and can be integrated using regression method. The weighting factors of each parameter were calculated using occupants’ sensation and expectation to reflect the subjective preferences in model. Finally, an evaluation model expressing the indoor thermal, air quality and occupant preferences was developed to provide an HVAC intelligent control system that is more responsive to occupant needs.
2018 China Building Energy Efficiency Research Report. Buildings, Shanghai, 2019 (in Chinese).
2.
LamJC.Energy analysis of commercial buildings in subtropical climates. Build Environ2000; 35: 19–26.
3.
XuCWLuoXLYuCCaoSJ.The 2019-nCoV epidemic control strategies and future challenges of building healthy smart cities. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29(5): 639–644.
4.
ChengYZhangSHuanCOladokuncMOLinZ.Optimization on fresh outdoor air ratio of air conditioning system with stratum ventilation for both targeted indoor air quality and maximal energy saving. Build Environ2019; 147: 11–22.
5.
RenJCaoSJ.Incorporating online monitoring data into fast prediction models towards the development of artificial intelligent ventilation systems. Sustain Cities Soc2019; 47: 101498.
6.
YanHYLiuQQZhaoWPangCMDongMGZhangHGaoJYWangHYHuBYangLWangL.The coupled effect of temperature, humidity, and air movement on human thermal response in hot–humid and hot–arid climates in summer in China. Build Environ2020; 177: 106898.
7.
LuoXLYu CWZhouDGuZL.Challenges and adaptation to urban climate change in China: a viewpoint of urban climate and urban planning. Indoor Built Environ2019; 28: 1157–1161.
8.
LimDBSonSKimSParkJ.Life cycle cost and CO2 emission simulation models of apartment building projects using system dynamics. Indoor Built Environ2019; 28: 310–321.
9.
LiYYuanYPLiCFHuanXZhangXS.Human responses to high air temperature, relative humidity and carbon dioxide concentration in underground refuge chamber. Build Environ2018; 131: 53–62.
10.
ASHRAE Standard 55-2013.Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta:American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), 2013.
11.
WangFLChenZLFengQQZhaoQCChengZJGuoZZhongZP.Experimental comparison between set-point based and satisfaction based indoor thermal environment control. Energy Build2016; 128: 686–696.
12.
PengYZNagyZSchlüterA.Temperature-preference learning with neural networks for occupant-centric building indoor climate controls. Build Environ2019; 154: 296–308.
13.
LuoMHCaoBZhouXLiMZhangJSOuyangQZhuYX.Can personal control influence human thermal comfort? A field study in residential buildings in China in winter. Energy Build2014; 72: 411–418.
14.
GhahramaniACastroGBecerik-GerberBYuanXR.Infrared thermography of human face for monitoring thermoregulation performance and estimating personal thermal comfort. Build Environ2016; 109: 1–11.
15.
FangZSLiuHLiBZChengY.Thermal comfort and skin temperature responses to the supplied air from personal air nozzles in aircraft cabins. Indoor Built Environ2018; 27: 831–845.
16.
LiuWWLianZWDengQH.Use of mean skin temperature in evaluation of individual thermal comfort for a person in a sleeping posture under steady thermal environment. Indoor Built Environ2015; 24: 489–499.
17.
ChoiJHYeomD.Investigation of the relationships between thermal sensations of local body areas and the whole body in an indoor built environment. Energy Build2017; 149: 204–215.
18.
BaeCLeeHChunC.Predicting indoor thermal sensation for the elderly in welfare centres in Korea using local skin temperatures. Indoor Built Environ2017; 26: 1155–1167.
19.
ChoiJH, andLoftnessVLeeDW.Investigation of the possibility of the use of heart rate as a human factor for thermal sensation models. Build Environ2012; 50: 165–175.
20.
DuCQLiaBZChengYLiCLiuHYaoR.Influence of human thermal adaptation and its development on human thermal responses to warm environments. Build Environ2018; 139: 134–145.
21.
WangFLFengQQChenZLZhaoQCChengZJZouJHZhangYFMaiJBLiYReevefHD.Predictive control of indoor environment using occupant number detected by video data and CO2 concentration. Energy Build2017; 145: 155–162.
22.
ZhaoQCZhaoYWangFLJiangYZhangF.Preliminary study of learning individual thermal complaint behavior using one-class classifier for indoor environment control. Build Environ2014; 72: 201–211.
23.
RenCCaoSJ.Implementation and visualization of artificial intelligent ventilation control system using fast prediction models and limited monitoring data. Sustain Cities Soc2020; 52: 101860.
24.
CaoSJRenC.Ventilation control strategy using low-dimensional linear ventilation models and artificial neural network. Build Environ2018; 144: 316–333.
25.
RenCCaoSJ.Development and application of linear ventilation and temperature models for indoor environmental prediction and HVAC systems control. Sustain Cities Soc2019; 51: 101673.
DengYLFengZBFangJCaoSJ.Impact of ventilation rates on indoor thermal comfort and energy efficiency of ground-source heat pump system. Sustain Cities Soc2018; 37: 154–163.
28.
DengHYFengZBCaoSJ.Influence of air change rates on indoor CO2 stratification in terms of Richardson number and vorticity. Build Environ2018; 129: 74–84.
29.
NassifN.A robust CO2-based demand-controlled ventilation control strategy for multi-zone HVAC systems. Energy Build2012; 45: 72–81.
30.
FanYItoK.Integrated building energy-computational fluid dynamics simulation for estimating the energy-saving effect of energy recovery ventilator with CO2, demand-controlled ventilation system in office space. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 785–803.
31.
CaoSJDengHY.Investigation of temperature regulation effects on indoor thermal comfort, air quality, and energy savings toward green residential buildings. Sci Technol Built Environ2019; 25: 309–321.
32.
LiWZhangJLZhaoTYLiangR.Experimental study of human thermal sensation estimation model in built environment based on the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model. Build Simul2018; 12: 365–377.
33.
GengYLinB.Indoor environmental quality of green office buildings in China: large-scale and long-term measurement. Build Environ2019; 150: 266–280.
34.
XueQWWangZJLiuJDongJK.Indoor PM2.5 concentrations during winter in a severe cold region of China: A comparison of passive and conventional residential buildings. Build Environ. 2020; 180: 106857.
35.
SalisLCRAbadieMWargockiPRodeC.Towards the definition of indicators for assessment of indoor air quality and energy performance in low-energy residential buildings. Energy Build2017; 152: 492–502.
36.
WeiWRamalhoODerbezMRibéronJKirchnerSMandinC.Applicability and relevance of six indoor air quality indexes. Build Environ2016; 109: 42–49.
37.
NcubeMRiffatS.Developing an indoor environment quality tool for assessment of mechanically ventilated office buildings in the UK – a preliminary study. Build Environ2012; 53: 26–33.
38.
WongLTMuiKWHuiPS.A multivariate-logistic model for acceptance of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in offices. Build Environ2008; 43: 1–6.
39.
RalegaonkarRVSakhareVV.Development of multi-parametric functional index model for evaluating the indoor comfort in built environment. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 615–621.
40.
BurattiCBelloniEMerliFRicciardiP.A new index combining thermal, acoustic, and visual comfort of moderate environments in temperate climates. Build Environ2018; 139: 27–37.
41.
LarsenTSRohdeLJønssonKTRasmussenBJensenRLKnudsenHNBeköG.IEQ-compass – A tool for holistic evaluation of potential indoor environmental quality. Build Environ2020; 172: 106707.
42.
CaoBOuyangQZhuYXHuangLHuHBDengGF.Development of a multivariate regression model for overall satisfaction in public buildings based on field studies in Beijing and Shanghai. Build Environ2012; 47: 394–399.
43.
PaniaguaJMRufoMTJiménezAAntolínA.Dimensionless coefficients for assessing human exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields indoors and outdoors in urban areas. Environ Res2020; 183: 109188.
44.
CuiWWenH.The Correlation analysis of atmospheric model accuracy based on the Pearson correlation criterion. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2020; 780: 032045.
45.
HowardMJerryW.Chapter 65 – Linearity in calibration, act III scene II: a discussion of the Durbin-Watson statistic, a step in the right direction, chemometrics in spectroscopy. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Academic Press, 2018, pp.433–440.
Martinez-MolinaABoarinPTort-AusinaIVivancosJL.Post-occupancy evaluation of a historic primary school in Spain: comparing PMV, TSV and PD for teachers’ and pupils’ thermal comfort. Build Environ2017; 117: 248–259.
48.
HasanMHAlsaleemFRafaieM.Sensitivity study for the PMV thermal comfort model and the use of wearable devices biometric data for metabolic rate estimation. Build Environ2016; 110: 173–183.
49.
FabbriK.Thermal comfort evaluation in kindergarten: PMV and PPD measurement through datalogger and questionnaire. Build Environ2013; 68: 202–214.
50.
CheungaTSchiavonSParkinsonTLiPXBragerG.Analysis of the accuracy on PMV – PPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II. Build Environ2019; 153: 205–217.
51.
LuSLLiuYSunYCYinSJiangXY.Indoor thermal environmental evaluation of Chinese green building based on new index OTCP and subjective satisfaction. J Clean Prod2019; 240: 118151.
52.
GivoniBKhedariJWongNHFeriadiHNoguchiM.Thermal sensation responses in hot, humid climates: effects of humidity. Build Res Inform. 2006; 34: 496–506.
53.
ASHRAE 62.1-2013. Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), 2013.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
