The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between cognitive performance, health and environmental comfort as a function of indoor air temperature (Ta) variation. A total of 360 undergraduate students were subjected to the variation of the Ta at 20, 24 and 30 °C; their thermal responses were evaluated over three consecutive days. Performance variables measured in the study were cognitive performance, blood pressure, heart rate (HR) and comfort. The environmental variables measured were Ta, globe temperature (Tg), illumination, noise, airflow velocity and air quality. The variation in HR was influenced by the variables, relative air humidity and mean radiant temperature (Trm) during the three days of observation, where HR was higher than 100 bpm when Tg was greater than Ta. Trm increased proportionally to the increase in Tg, thus characterising heat exchange by radiation. The number of correct answers and test response time were also positively influenced by Trm when Ta was 20 °C. Teaching environments (TEs) with increased heat load due to the individual body heat of students, increased outdoor Ta and urban morphology associated with the building of the TEs result in increasing in Trm due to the Tg being higher than the air temperature, with possible impacts on health and performance variables.
SilvaLD. Análise sobre conforto térmico e desempenho nos ambientes de ensino com video display terminals (vdt): estudos de multicasos no nordeste do brasil e norte de portugal. Projeto de Pesquisa, Brasília, Brasil: MCTI/CNPq, 2013, n ° 14, p.59.
2.
Steskens P and Loomans M. Performance indicators for health, comfort and safety of the indoor environment. In: Proceedings Clima 2010 – 10th REHVA World Congress, Antalya, Turkey, May 9--12 2010, p.9. Antalya: TTMD.
3.
SanjogJPatelTKarmakarS.Indoor physical work environment: an ergonomics perspective. Int J Sci Eng Technol Res2013;
2: 507–513.
4.
NiemelaRHannulabMRautioaSReijulaKRailioJ.The effect of air temperature on labour productivity in call centres – a case study. Energy Build2002;
34: 759–764.
5.
OlesenBW. Indoor environment-health-comfort and productivity. In: Proceedings of Clima 2005, 8th REHVA world congress 2005, October 9–12 2005. Lausanne (Switzerland): Federation of European Heating & Air-Conditioning Association (REHVA), 2005.
6.
TakashiAShinichiTTakashiYMasatoY.Thermal comfort and productivity – evaluation of workplace environment in a task conditioned office. Build Environ2010;
45: 45–50.
7.
LanLWargockiPLianZ.Quantitative measurement of productivity loss due to thermal discomfort. Energy Build2011;
43: 1057–1062.
8.
WargockiPWyonAP.Ten questions concerning thermal and indoor air quality effects on the performance of office work and schoolwork. Build Environ2017;
112: 359–366.
9.
Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudanças Climáticas. Climate Change 2013 – the physical science basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. Estocolmo, IPCC, www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WGIAR5_SPM_brochure_en.pdf. Accessed date 05/21/2017 (2013, accessed 10 November 2013).
10.
NuriaCLlinares MillánMDCBravoJMBlanca GiménezV.Subjective assessment of university classroom environment. Build Environ2017;
122: 72–81.
11.
LiuWLianZLiuY.Heart rate variability at different thermal comfort levels. Eur J Appl Physiol2008;
103: 361–366.
12.
ChoiJ-HLoftnessVLeeD-W.Investigation of the possibility of the use of heart rate as a human factor for thermal sensation models. Build Environ2012;
50: 165–175.
13.
LanLWargockiPLianZ.Thermal effects on human performance in office environment measured by integrating task speed and accuracy. Appl Ergon2014;
45: 490–495.
14.
Zhu HWang HLiu ZLi DKou GLi C.Experimental study on the human thermal comfort based on the heart rate variability (HRV) analysis under different environments. Sci Total Environ2018;
616–617: 1124–1133.
15.
TaelmanJVandeputSVlemincxESpaepenAVan HuffelS.Instantaneous changes in heart rate regulation due to mental load in simulated office work. Eur J Appl Physiol2011;
111: 1497–1505.
16.
Luque-CasadoAZabalaMMoralesEMateo-MarchMSanabriaD.Cognitive performance and heart rate variability: the influence of fitness level. PLoS One2013;
8: e56935.
SosnowskiTSobotaARynkiewiczA.Program running versus problem solving: two patterns of cardiac response. Int J Psychophysiol2012;
86: 187–193.
19.
SiqueiraJCFda SilvaLBCoutinhoASRodriguesMR.Analysis of air temperature changes on blood pressure and heart rate and performance of undergraduate students. Work2017;
57: 43–54.
20.
ChakrabortyKHarperRK.Measuring the impact of socio-economic factors on school efficiency in Australia. Atl Econ J2017;
45: 163–179.
21.
VasconcelosPEde Medeiros. Relação entre variáveis térmicas e desempenho - um estudo com estudantes da academia de polícia militar do estado da paraíba.
Saarbrucken:
Novas Edições Acadêmicas, 2015.
22.
SiqueiraJCFda SilvaLBB.Ambientes de ensino inteligentes – conforto térmico, desempenho cognitivo e parâmetros cardiovasculares de alunos universitários.
Saarbrucken:
Novas Edições Acadêmicas, 2015.
23.
SeppänenOAFiskW.Some quantitative relations between indoor environmental quality and work performance or health. HVAC&R Res2006;
12: 957–973.
24.
LeeMCMuiKWWongLTChanWYLeeEWCheungCT.
Student learning performance and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in air-conditioned university teaching rooms. Build Environ2012;
49: 238–244.
25.
ThamKWWillemHC.Room air temperature affects occupants’ physiology, perceptions and mental alertness. Build Environ2010;
45: 40–44.
26.
Bakó-Biró Z, Kochhar N, Clements-Croome DJ, Awbi HB and Williams M. Ventilation rates in schools and learning performance. In: Proceedings of Clima 2007 WellBeing Indoors, The 9th REHVA World Congress, Helsinki, Finland, Jun 10--14 2007, pp.1434–1440. Helsink: FINVAC.
27.
AraújoRR.O conforto térmico e as implicações na saúde: uma abordagem preliminar sobre os seus efeitos na população urbana de São Luís-Maranhão. Cadernos de Pesquisa2012;
19: 51–60.
28.
VanosJKWarlandJSGillespieTJKennyNA.Review of the physiology of human thermal comfort while exercising in urban landscapes and implications for bioclimatic design. Int J Biometeorol2010;
54: 319–334.
29.
LundgrenKKuklaneKGaoCHolmérI.Effects of heat stress on working populations when facing climate change. Ind Health2013;
51: 3–15.
30.
ParsonsK.Maintaining health, comfort and productivity in heat waves. Global Health Action2009;
2: 1–8.
31.
WuSDengFLiuYShimaMNiuJHuangQGuoX.Temperature, traffic-related air pollution, and heart rate variability in a panel of healthy adults. Environ Res2013;
120: 82–89.
32.
KayihanGErsozGKozM.Relationship between efficiency of pistol shooting and selected physical-physiological parameters of police. Policing2013;
36: 819–832.
33.
SteptoeAKivimäkiM.Stress and cardiovascular disease: an update on current knowledge. Annu Rev Public Health2013;
34: 337–354.
34.
SteptoeAKivimäkiM.Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol2012;
9: 360–370.
35.
ISO 9920:2007. Ergonomics of the thermal environment: estimation of thermal insulation and water vapour resistance of a clothing ensemble.
Geneva:
International Organization for Standardization, 2007.
36.
CoutinhoAS.Conforto e insalubridade térmica em ambientes de trabalho. 2nd ed.
João Pessoa, Brasil:
Editora Universitária/UFPB/PPGEP, 2005.
37.
IidaIBuarqueL.Ergonomia: projeto e produção. 6th ed.
São Paulo:
Edgard Blucher Ltd, 2016.
38.
ISO 7726:1998. Ergonomics: instruments for measuring physical quantities.
Geneva:
International Organization for Standardization, 1998.
39.
NBR ISO/CIE 8995:2013. Iluminação de ambientes de trabalho.
Brasília:
Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, www.abnt.org.br/ (2013, accessed 7 April 2017).
NBR 16401-3:2008. Instalações de ar condicionado–sistemas centrais e unitários.
Rio de Janeiro:
Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, 2008.
42.
ISO 10551:1995. Ergonomics of the thermal environment: assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales.
Geneva:
International Organization for Standardization, 1995.
43.
PrimiRAlmeidaLS.Estudo de validação da bateria de provas de raciocínio (BPR-5). Psic: Teor e Pesq2000;
16: 165–173.
ISO 7730:2005. Ergonomics of the thermal environment: analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria.
Geneva:
International Organization for Standardization, 2005.
46.
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004.Energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2004.
47.
CordeiroGMDemétrioCGB.Modelos lineares generalizados e extensões. 7th ed. Piracicaba: UFSM, 2008.
48.
DobsonAJBarnettAG.An introduction to generalized linear models. 3rd ed.
Boca Raton:
CRC Press, 2008.
49.
NBR 10152: 1987. Níveis de ruído Para conforto acústico.
City Brasília:
Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, 1987.
50.
Dos SantosJSDos SantosGD.Estudo microclimático em pontos representativos da malha urbana da cidade de João Pessoa\pb: uma avaliação do campo térmico. Rev Bras Geog Fis2013;
6: 1430–1448.
51.
Sociedade Brasileira de CardiologiaV diretrizes de monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial (mapa) e iii diretrizes de monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA). Arquivo Brasileiro de Cardiologia2011;
97: 1–24.
ANVISA. Resolution 9 of the National Health Surveillance Agency, http://portal.anvisa.gov.br (2018, accessed 12 September 2019).
54.
MaulaHHongistoVÖstmanLHaapakangasAKoskelaHHyönäJ.The effect of slightly warm temperature on work performance and comfort in open-plan offices – a laboratory study. Indoor Air2016;
26: 286–297.
55.
GuytonACHallJE.Fisiologia humana e mecanismos das doenças. 6th ed.
Rio de Janeiro:
Editora Guanabara Koogan, 1998.
