This study investigated effects of incident wind angles on wind velocity distributions in wakes of two generic building configurations, namely, ‘T’- and ‘+’-shaped, and the air pressure distributions along their leeward walls by using computational fluid dynamics simulations. Results show that when the wind approaches laterally (90°) (vs. when the wind is direct (0°)), the downwind length and maximum bilateral width of the low-wind velocity zone in the wake of ‘T’-shaped building decrease by 11.5% and 37.9%, respectively. When the incident wind is oblique (45°) (vs. when it is direct), the length and width of this low-wind velocity zone in the wake of ‘+’-shaped building decrease by 15.0% and 30.9%, respectively. Furthermore, results show that the air pressure on the leeward walls of the ‘T’- and ‘+’-shaped buildings gradually decreases along with the building height. The resulting low-wind conditions on upper floors of buildings reduce the fresh air intake of their leeward units utilizing natural ventilation. It is particularly apparent in the case of direct approaching wind. Thus, the appropriate selection of building configurations and their orientations allows for the most effective use of wind to enhance ventilation in indoor and urban environments.
BorregoCMartinsHTchepelOSalmimLMonteiroAMirandaAI.How urban structure can affect city sustainability from an air quality perspective. Environ Model Softw2006; 21: 461–467.
2.
LeeKYMakCM.A comprehensive approach to study stack emissions from a research building in a small urban setting. Sustain Cities Soc2019; 51: 101710.
3.
YuanCNgENorfordLK.Improving air quality in high-density cities by understanding the relationship between air pollutant dispersion and urban morphologies. Build Environ2014; 71: 245–258.
4.
DaiYMakCMAiZHangJ.Evaluation of computational and physical parameters influencing CFD simulations of pollutant dispersion in building arrays. Build Environ2018; 137: 90–107.
5.
AiZTMakCM.CFD simulation of flow in a long street canyon under a perpendicular wind direction: evaluation of three computational settings. Build Environ2017; 114: 293–306.
6.
ChewLWNorfordLK.Pedestrian-level wind speed enhancement in urban street canyons with void decks. Build Environ2018; 146: 64–76.
7.
DuYMakCMLiuJXiaQNiuJKwokKCS.Effects of lift-up design on pedestrian level wind comfort in different building configurations under three wind directions. Build Environ2017; 117: 84–99.
8.
DuYMakCMKwokKTseK-TLeeT-CAiZLiuJNiuJ.New criteria for assessing low wind environment at pedestrian level in Hong Kong. Build Environ2017; 123: 23–36.
9.
NgE.Policies and technical guidelines for urban planning of high-density cities – air ventilation assessment (AVA) of Hong Kong. Build Environ2009; 44: 1478–1488.
10.
ChenKWNorfordL.Evaluating urban forms for comparison studies in the massing design stage. Sustainability2017; 9: 987.
11.
HuangYHuXZengN.Impact of wedge-shaped roofs on airflow and pollutant dispersion inside urban street canyons. Build Environ2009; 44: 2335–2347.
12.
YimSHLFungJCHLauAKHKotSC.Air ventilation impacts of the “wall effect” resulting from the alignment of high-rise buildings. Atmos Environ2009; 43: 4982–4994.
13.
MittalHSharmaAGairolaA.Numerical simulation of pedestrian level wind flow around buildings: effect of corner modification and orientation. J Build Eng2019; 22: 314–326.
14.
ZhaoD-XHeB-J.Effects of architectural shapes on surface wind pressure distribution: case studies of oval-shaped tall buildings. J Build Eng2017; 12: 219–228.
15.
BadyMKatoSHuangH.Towards the application of indoor ventilation efficiency indices to evaluate the air quality of urban areas. Build Environ2008; 43: 1991–2004.
16.
HangJLiYSandbergM.Experimental and numerical studies of flows through and within high-rise building arrays and their link to ventilation strategy. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2011; 99: 1036–1055.
17.
HangJSandbergMLiY.Age of air and air exchange efficiency in idealized city models. Build Environ2009; 44: 1714–1723.
18.
AiZTMakCMLeeHC.Roadside air quality and implications for control measures: a case study of Hong Kong. Atmos Environ2016; 137: 6–16.
19.
FangZFengXLiuJLinZMakCMNiuJTseK-TXuX.Investigation into the differences among several outdoor thermal comfort indices against field survey in subtropics. Sustain Cities Soc2019; 44: 676–690.
20.
AiZTMakCM.Large-eddy simulation of flow and dispersion around an isolated building: analysis of influencing factors. Comput Fluids2015; 118: 89–100.
21.
DuYMakCM.Improving pedestrian level low wind velocity environment in high-density cities: a general framework and case study. Sustain Cities Soc2018; 42: 314–324.
22.
ChengVNgE.Thermal comfort in urban open spaces for Hong Kong. Archit Sci Rev2006; 49: 236–242.
23.
NgETamINgAGivoniBKatzschnerLKwokKChengV.Feasibility study for establishment of air ventilation assessment system–final report. Hong Kong: Department of Architecture, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2005.
24.
DuYMakCMLiY.A multi-stage optimization of pedestrian level wind environment and thermal comfort with lift-up design in ideal urban canyons. Sustain Cities Soc2019; 46: 101424.
25.
GaoNPNiuJLPerinoMHeiselbergP.The airborne transmission of infection between flats in high-rise residential buildings: tracer gas simulation. Building Environ2008; 43: 1805–1817.
26.
TsaiMYChenKS.Measurements and three-dimensional modeling of air pollutant dispersion in an Urban Street Canyon. Atmos Environ2004; 38: 5911–5924.
27.
WangJSChanTLCheungCSLeungCWHungWT.Three-dimensional pollutant concentration dispersion of a vehicular exhaust plume in the real atmosphere. Atmos Environ2006; 40: 484–497.
28.
JiangYAlexanderDJenkinsHArthurRChenQ.Natural ventilation in buildings: measurement in a wind tunnel and numerical simulation with large-eddy simulation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2003; 91: 331–353.
29.
Padilla-MarcosMÁMeissAFeijó-MuñozJ.Proposal for a simplified CFD procedure for obtaining patterns of the age of air in outdoor spaces for the natural ventilation of buildings. Energies2017; 10: 1252.
30.
WangXSunXYuCWF.Building envelope with variable thermal performance: opportunities and challenges. Indoor Built Environ2018; 27: 729–733.
31.
DaiYWMakCMAiZT.Computational fluid dynamics simulation of wind-driven inter-unit dispersion around multi-storey buildings: upstream building effect. IndoorBuilt Environ2017; 28: 217–234.
32.
YinHLiuCZhangLLiAMaZ.Measurement and evaluation of indoor air quality in naturally ventilated residential buildings. Indoor Built Environ2019; 28: 1307–1323.
33.
ManXLuYLiGWangYLiuJ.A study on the stack effect of a super high-rise residential building in a severe cold region in China. Indoor Built Environ2019; 29: 255–269.
34.
DengXTanZ.Numerical analysis of local thermal comfort in a plan office under natural ventilation. Indoor Built Environ2019; 29: 972–986.
35.
AflakiAMahyuddinNAl-Cheikh MahmoudZBaharumMR.A review on natural ventilation applications through building façade components and ventilation openings in tropical climates. Energy Build2015; 101: 153–162.
36.
CaoS-JYuCWLuoX.Heating, ventilating and air conditioning system and environmental control for wellbeing. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29: 1191–1194.
37.
AiZTMakCM.Wind-induced single-sided natural ventilation in buildings near a long street canyon: CFD evaluation of street configuration and envelope design. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2018; 172: 96–106.
38.
BlockenBStathopoulosTvan BeeckJPAJ.Pedestrian-level wind conditions around buildings: review of wind-tunnel and CFD techniques and their accuracy for wind comfort assessment. Build Environ2016; 100: 50–81.
39.
LongoRFürstMBellemansAFerrarottiMDerudiMParenteA.CFD dispersion study based on a variable Schmidt formulation for flows around different configurations of ground-mounted buildings. Build Environ2019; 154: 336–347.
40.
MochidaALunIYF.Prediction of wind environment and thermal comfort at pedestrian level in urban area. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2008; 96: 1498–1527.
41.
van DruenenTvan HooffTMontazeriHBlockenB.CFD evaluation of building geometry modifications to reduce pedestrian-level wind speed. Build Environ2019; 163: 106293.
42.
van HooffTBlockenBTominagaY.On the accuracy of CFD simulations of cross-ventilation flows for a generic isolated building: comparison of RANS, LES and experiments. Build Environ2017; 114: 148–165.
43.
YoshieRMochidaATominagaYKataokaHHarimotoKNozuTShirasawaT.Cooperative project for CFD prediction of pedestrian wind environment in the Architectural Institute of Japan. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2007; 95: 1551–1578.
44.
LeitlBSchatzmannM.Compilation of experimental data for validation purposes. Hamburg: Meteorology Institute, Hamburg University, 1998.
45.
AnKFungJCHYimSHL.Sensitivity of inflow boundary conditions on downstream wind and turbulence profiles through building obstacles using a CFD approach. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2013; 115: 137–149.
46.
XiaQNiuJLiuX.Dispersion of air pollutants around buildings: a review of past studies and their methodologies. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 201–224.
47.
BlockenB.Computational fluid dynamics for urban physics: importance, scales, possibilities, limitations and ten tips and tricks towards accurate and reliable simulations. Build Environ2015; 91: 219–245.
48.
LiuJNiuJ.CFD simulation of the wind environment around an isolated high-rise building: an evaluation of SRANS, LES and DES models. Build Environ2016; 96: 91–106.
49.
LatebMMassonCStathopoulosTBedardC.Comparison of various types of k-epsilon models for pollutant emissions around a two-building configuration. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2013; 115: 9–21.
50.
TominagaYStathopoulosT.Numerical simulation of dispersion around an isolated cubic building: comparison of various types of k–ɛ models. Atmos Environ2009; 43: 3200–3210.
51.
TienPWCalautitJK.Numerical analysis of the wind and thermal comfort in courtyards “skycourts” in high rise buildings. J Build Eng2019; 24: 100735.
52.
AiZTMakCM.A study of interunit dispersion around multistory buildings with single-sided ventilation under different wind directions. Atmos Environ2014; 88: 1–13.
53.
ANSYS FLUENT 14.5. Canonsburg: ANSYS, Inc., 2012.
54.
AiZTMakCM.CFD simulation of flow and dispersion around an isolated building: effect of inhomogeneous ABL and near-wall treatment. Atmos Environ2013; 77: 568–578.
55.
RichardsPJHoxeyRP.Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ϵ turbulence model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1993; 46–47: 145–153.
56.
GorléCvan BeeckJRambaudP.Dispersion in the wake of a rectangular building: validation of two Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes modelling approaches. Boundary-Layer Meteorol2010; 137: 115–133.
57.
LiuJZhangXNiuJTseKT.Pedestrian-level wind and gust around buildings with a ‘lift-up’ design: assessment of influence from surrounding buildings by adopting LES. Build Simul2019; 12: 1107–1118.
58.
YuHThéJ.Simulation of gaseous pollutant dispersion around an isolated building using the k–ω SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model. J Air Waste Manage Assoc2017; 67: 517–536.
59.
BlockenBStathopoulosTCarmelietJ.CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos Environ2007; 41: 238–252.
60.
FrankeJHellstenASchlünzen KHCarissimo B. The COST Action 732: Best Practice Guideline for the CFD simulation of Flow in the urban environment. In: Quality assurance and improvement of microscale meteorological models. Brussels: Meteorological Institute, 2007.
61.
TominagaYMochidaAYoshieRKataokaHNozuTYoshikawaMShirasawaT.AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2008; 96: 1749–1761.
62.
MontazeriHBlockenB.CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: validation and sensitivity analysis. Build Environ2013; 60: 137–149.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
