The aim of this work was to simulate the transport of pollutants in buildings. Focusing mainly on the presence of carbon dioxide, we resolved the airflow equations for two typical validation cases. These numerical results were compared to COMIS and CONTAM software, and they were used to evaluate the evolution of carbon dioxide concentration in different rooms. In order to obtain different parameters and filters of the proposed model, we used a statistical method based on Bayesian inference. This statistical adjustment allowed us to obtain a significant variation of contaminants in different cases. This tool seems to be a good candidate for the fitting of models.
Boyer H., Lauret AP, Adelard L., Mara TA: Building ventilation: a pressure airflow model computer generation and elements of validation: Energy Buildings1999;29:283-292.
2.
Allard F.: Natural ventilation in buildings, A design handbook. James and James (Science Publishers) Ltd, London, 1998.
3.
Rodriguez EA , Allard F.: Coupling COMIS airflow model with other transfer phenomena: Energy Buildings1992;18:147-157.
4.
Matsumoto H., Hayashi S.: A multi-zone ventilation model with contaminant emissions from building materials . AIVC 12045, Proc Roomvent 98: 6th Intl Conf Air Distribution in Rooms1998;1:5-10.
5.
Dariusz H., Clarke JA: Numerical modelling and the thermal simulation of PCM-gypsum composites with ESP: Energy Buildings2004;36:795-805.
6.
Strachan PA, Kokogiannakis G., Macdonald IA: History and development of validation with the ESP-r simulation program: Building Environ2008;43:601-609.
7.
Evola G., Popov V.: Computational analysis of wind driven natural ventilation in buildings: Energy Buildings2006;38:491-501.
8.
Feng-Dong Y. , Shi-Jun Y.: CFD simulation and optimisation of the ventilation for subway side-platform: Tunnelling Underground Space Technol2007;22:474-482.
9.
Wurtz E., Mora L., Inard C.: An equation-based simulation environment to investigate fast building simulation : Building Environ2006; 41:1571-1583.
10.
Musy M., Wurtz E., Sergent A.: Buildings airflow simulations: automatically generated zonal models: 7th Intl IBPSA Conf, Brazil2001;1:593-600.
11.
Gang T., Glicksman LR: Application of integrating multi-zone model with CFD simulation to natural ventilation prediction: Energy Buildings2005 ;37:1049-1057.
12.
Feustel HE: COMIS - an international multi-zone air-flow and contaminant transport model : Energy Building1999;30:3-18.
13.
Haas A., Weber A., Dorer V., Keilholz W., Pelletret R.: COMIS v3.1 Simulation environment for multizone air flow and pollutant transport modeling: Energy Buildings2002;34:873-882.
14.
Haghighat F. , Rao J.: A comprehensive validation of two airflow models - COMIS and CONTAM: Indoor Air1996 ;6:278-288.
15.
Roulet CA, Furbringer JM, Cretton P.: The influence of the user on the results of multizone air flow simulations with COMIS: Energy Buildings1999;30:73-86.
16.
Dols WS: A tool for modelling airflow & contaminant transportASHRAE J; 2001;43:35-42
17.
George NW: CONTAM96 User Manual: Report NISTIR 6056, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 1997.
18.
Haghighat F. , Rao J.: Computer-aided building ventilation system design - a system-theoretic: Energy Buildings1991;17:147-155.
19.
Furbringer J-M. , Roulet C.-A, Borchiellini R.: Evaluation of COMIS, final report IEA.ECB&CS Appendix 23 Multizone Airflow Modelling, LESO-PB , EPFL., 1996.
20.
Sohn MD, Small MJ: Parameter estimation of unknown air exchange rates and effective mixing volumes from tracers gas measurements for complex multi-zone indoor air models: Building Environment1999;34:293-303.
21.
Bossaer A., Ducarme D., Wouters P., Vandaele L.: An example of model evaluation by experimental comparison: pollutant spread in an apartment: Energy Building1999; 30:53-59.
22.
Lorenzetti DM: Computational aspects of nodal multizone airflow systems: Building Environ2002;37:1083-1090.
23.
Klobut K., Tuomaala P., Siren K., Seppanen O.: Simulation calculation of airflows, temperatures and contaminant concentration in multizone buildings, Air movement & ventilation control within buildings: 12th AIVC Conference, Canada , 1991.
24.
Water JR, Simons MW: The evaluation of contaminant concentration and Air flows in a multi-zone model of a building: Building Environ1987 ;22:305-315.
25.
Riviere C., Lauret P., Manicom Ramsamy JF, Page Y.: A Bayesian Neural Network approach to estimating the Energy Equivalent Speed : Accident Anal Prevention2006;38:248-259.
26.
Spiegelhalter D., Thomas A., Best N., Lunn D.: WinBUGS user manual-version 1.4. MRC Biostatistics Unit , Cambridge, UK, 2003.
27.
Jaynes: Bayesian methods: an introductory tutorial. Maximum entropy and Bayesian methods in applied statistics: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.
28.
Ihakaa R., Gentleman R.: A language for data analysis and graphics: J Comput Graph Stat1996;5:299-314.
29.
Sturtz S., Ligges U., Gelman A.: R2WinBUGS: a package for running WinBUGS from R: J Statist Software2005;12:1-16.
30.
Ligges U.: The BRugs package. OpenBRugs documentation, 2006.
31.
Tuomaala P.: New building air flow simulation model: Theoretical basis: Building Serv Eng Res Technol1993;14:151-157.
32.
Tuomaala P. , Rahola J.: Combined Air flow and Thermal simulation of buildings: Building Environ1995;30:255-265.
33.
Kozdron-Zabiegada B., Namiesnik J., Przyjazny A.: Use of passive dosimeters for evaluation of the quality of indoor and outdoor air: Indoor Environ1995;4: 189-203.
