Operating rooms (ORs) often have door openings connected to uncontrolled areas that are more contaminated. Opening the door may allow an inflow of contaminated air, degrade the microbiological air cleanliness and possibly cause surgical site infections (SSIs). This study numerically investigated the transient airflow and bacteria-carrying particles spread caused by the opening of a sliding door in an OR with mixing ventilation. Results showed that a single door opening raises the overall OR contamination by 2.1 colony-forming units per cubic metre (CFU/m3) under a temperature difference of about 3°C. With a similar level of overall contamination, the risk of infections differs dramatically, as the corresponding contamination at the surgical site ranges from lower than 1 CFU/m3 to higher than 10 CFU/m3. This implies that quantifying only the air volume exchange is not sufficient for a valid and reliable assessment of the impact of door openings on the risk of SSIs. Temporarily reducing the OR exhaust flow during door operation was found to be an effective solution to minimize the impact of door openings on the risk of infections. In the case examined in the present study, a 20–30% reduction in OR exhaust flow decreases the airborne contamination to a sufficiently low level.
MangramAJHoranTCPearsonMLSilverLCJarvisWR.Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Am J Infect Control1999;
27: 97–134.
2.
Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. Vårdrelaterade infektioner – kunskap, konsekvenser, kostnader.2017. Stockholm, Sweden: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (SKL).
3.
CoelloRCharlettAWilsonJWardVPearsonABorrielloP.Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. J Hosp Infect2005;
60: 93–103.
4.
BroexECJvan AsseltADIBruggemanCAvan TielFH.Surgical site infections: how high are the costs?J Hosp Infect2009;
72: 193–201.
5.
LidwellOMLowburyEJLWhyteWBlowersRStanleySJLoweD.Airborne contamination of wounds in joint replacement operations: the relationship to sepsis rates. J Hosp Infect1983;
4: 111–131.
6.
WhyteWHodgsonRTinklerJ.The importance of airborne bacterial contamination of wounds. J Hosp Infect1982;
3: 123–135.
7.
SIS-TS 39:2015. Microbiological cleanliness in the operating room – preventing airborne contamination – guidance and fundamental requirements. Swedish Standard Institute, Stockholm, 2015.
8.
CaoGNilssenAMChengZStenstadL-IRadtkeASkogåsJG.Laminar airflow and mixing ventilation: which is better for operating room airflow distribution near an orthopedic surgical patient?Am J Infect Control2019;
47: 737–743.
9.
ChowTTLinZBaiW.The integrated effect of medical lamp position and diffuser discharge velocity on ultra-clean ventilation performance in an operating theatre. Indoor Built Environ2006;
15: 315–331.
10.
LjungqvistBReinmüllerBGusténJGusténLNordenadlerJ.Contamination risks due to door openings in operating rooms. Eur J Parent Pharm Sci2009;
14: 97–101.
11.
DIN 1946-4. Ventilation and air conditioning – part 4: VAC systems in buildings and rooms used in the health care sector.
German Institute for Standardization (DIN),
Berlin, 2008.
12.
VillafruelaJMSan JoséJFCastroFZarzueloA.Airflow patterns through a sliding door during opening and foot traffic in operating rooms. Build Environ2016;
109: 190–198.
13.
LynchRJEnglesbeMJSturmLBitarABudhirajKKollaSPolyachenkoYDuckMGCampbellDA.Measurement of foot traffic in the operating room: implications for infection control. Am J Med Qual2009;
24: 45–52.
14.
PanahiPStrohMCasperDSParviziJAustinMS.Operating room traffic is a major concern during total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res2012;
470: 2690–2694.
15.
SmithEBRaphaelIJMaltenfortMGHonsawekSDolanKYounkinsEA.The effect of laminar air flow and door openings on operating room contamination. J Arthroplast2013;
28: 1482–1485.
16.
AnderssonAEBerghIKarlssonJErikssonBINilssonK.Traffic flow in the operating room: an explorative and descriptive study on air quality during orthopedic trauma implant surgery. Am J Infect Control2012;
40: 750–755.
17.
MathijssenNMCHanninkGSturmPDJPilotPBloemRMBumaPPetitPLCSchreursBW.The effect of door openings on numbers of colony forming units in the operating room during hip revision surgery. Surg Infect2016;
17: 535–540.
18.
PerezPHollowayJEhrenfeldLCohenSCunninghamLMileyGBHollenbeckBL.Door openings in the operating room are associated with increased environmental contamination. Am J Infect Control2018;
46: 954–956.
19.
RezapoorMAlvandAJacekEPaziukTMaltenfortMGParviziJ.Operating room traffic increases aerosolized particles and compromises the air quality: a simulated study. J Arthroplast2018;
33: 851–855.
20.
StauningMTBediako-BowanAAndersenLPOpintanJALabiA-KKurtzhalsJALBjerrumS.Traffic flow and microbial air contamination in operating rooms at a major teaching hospital in Ghana. J Hosp Infect2018;
99: 263–270.
21.
SadrizadehSPantelicJShermanMClarkJAboualiO.Airborne particle dispersion to an operating room environment during sliding and hinged door opening. J Infect Public Health2018;
11: 631–635.
22.
ShawBAirWW.Movement through doorways – the influence of temperature and its control by forced airflow. J Build Serv Eng1974;
42: 210–218.
23.
LidwellOM.Air exchange through doorways. The effect of temperature difference, turbulence and ventilation flow. J Hyg1977;
79: 141–154.
24.
TangJWNicolleAPantelicJKlettnerCASuRKalliomakiPSaarinenPKoskelaHReijulaKMustakallioPCheongDKWSekharCThamKW.Different types of door-opening motions as contributing factors to containment failures in hospital isolation rooms. PLoS ONE2013;
8: e66663.
25.
HathwayAPapakonstantisIBruce-KonuahABrevisW.Experimental and modelling investigations of air exchange and infection transfer due to hinged-door motion in office and hospital settings. Int J Vent2015;
14: 127–140.
26.
KalliomäkiPSaarinenPTangJWKoskelaH.Airflow patterns through single hinged and sliding doors in hospital isolation rooms – effect of ventilation, flow differential and passage. Build Environ2016;
107: 154–168.
27.
KalliomäkiPHagströmKItkonenHGrönvallIKoskelaH.Effectiveness of directional airflow in reducing containment failures in hospital isolation rooms generated by door opening. Build Environ2019;
158: 83–93.
28.
LeeSParkBKurabuchiT.Numerical evaluation of influence of door opening on interzonal air exchange. Build Environ2016;
102: 230–242.
29.
SaarinenPKalliomäkiPKoskelaHTangJW.Large-eddy simulation of the containment failure in isolation rooms with a sliding door—an experimental and modelling study. Build Simul2018;
11: 585–596.
30.
HangJLiYChingWHWeiJJinRLiuLXieX.Potential airborne transmission between two isolation cubicles through a shared anteroom. Build Environ2015;
89: 264–278.
31.
BaloccoCPetroneGCammarataG.Assessing the effects of sliding doors on an operating theatre climate. Build Simul2012;
5: 73–83.
32.
ZhouBDingLLiFXueKNielsenPVXuY.Influence of opening and closing process of sliding door on interface airflow characteristic in operating room. Build Environ2018;
144: 459–473.
33.
SadrizadehSAfshariAKarimipanahTHåkanssonUNielsenPV.Numerical simulation of the impact of surgeon posture on airborne particle distribution in a turbulent mixing operating theatre. Build Environ2016;
110: 140–147.
34.
CaoS-J.Challenges of using CFD simulation for the design and online control of ventilation systems. Indoor Built Environ2019;
28: 3–6.
35.
XiaQNiuJLiuX.Dispersion of air pollutants around buildings: a review of past studies and their methodologies. Indoor Built Environ2014;
23: 201–224.
36.
Rabanillo-HerreroMPadilla-MarcosMÁFeijó-MuñozJMeissA.Effects of the radiant heating system location on both the airflow and ventilation efficiency in a room. Indoor Built Environ2019;
28: 372–383.
37.
TanDLiBChengYLiuHChenJ. Airflow pattern and performance of wall confluent jets ventilation for heating in a typical office space. Indoor Built Environ. Epub ahead of print 31 May 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X19842632.
38.
SadrizadehSTammelinAEkolindPHolmbergS.Influence of staff number and internal constellation on surgical site infection in an operating room. Particuology2014;
13: 42–51.
39.
WeiJLiY.Enhanced spread of expiratory droplets by turbulence in a cough jet. Build Environ2015;
93: 86–96.
40.
ZhaoBZhangYLiXYangXHuangD.Comparison of indoor aerosol particle concentration and deposition in different ventilated rooms by numerical method. Build Environ2004;
39: 1–8.
41.
ChangT-JHuT-S.Transport mechanisms of airborne particulate matters in partitioned indoor environment. Build Environ2008;
43: 886–895.
42.
NobleWC.Dispersal of skin microorganisms. Br J Dermatol1975;
93: 477–485.
ZhangZChenQ.Experimental measurements and numerical simulations of particle transport and distribution in ventilated rooms. Atmos Environ2006;
40: 3396–3408.
45.
HangJLiYJinR.The influence of human walking on the flow and airborne transmission in a six-bed isolation room: tracer gas simulation. Build Environ2014;
77: 119–134.
46.
RenCFengZCenDCaoS-J.Study on the subway environment induced by moving train using Gaussian distributed momentum source theory method. Indoor Built Environ2019;
28: 1083–1091.
47.
CarneiroRGasparPDSilvaPD.3D and transient numerical modelling of door opening and closing processes and its influence on thermal performance of cold rooms. Appl Therm Eng2017;
113: 585–600.
48.
WangCHolmbergSSadrizadehS.Numerical study of temperature-controlled airflow in comparison with turbulent mixing and laminar airflow for operating room ventilation. Build Environ2018;
144: 45–56.
49.
LuWHowarthATAdamNRiffatSB.Modelling and measurement of airflow and aerosol particle distribution in a ventilated two-zone chamber. Build Environ1996;
31: 417–423.
