The study reported herein builds on occupant response to an intermittent air jet strategy (IAJS), which creates periodic airflow and non-isothermal conditions in the occupied zone. Previous research has highlighted benefits of IAJS for the thermal climate and energy saving potential in view of human thermal perception of the indoor environment. The study herein explores the occupant acceptability of air movements and perceived indoor air quality. Thirty-six participants were exposed to three room air temperatures (nominal: 22.5℃, 25.5℃ and 28.5℃) with each having four air speed conditions (nominal: < 0.15 m/s under mixing ventilation (MV) and 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 m/s under IAJS) measured at the breathing height (1.1 m). The results show that participants preferred low air movements at lower temperatures and high air movements at higher temperatures. A model to predict percentage satisfied with intermittent air movements was developed. The model predicts that 87% of occupants, in compliance with ASHRAE 55-2013 standard, will find intermittent air movements acceptable between 23.7℃ and 29.1℃ within an air speed range of 0.4 to 0.8 m/s. IAJS also improved participants' perception of air quality in conditions deemed poor under MV. The findings support the potential of IAJS as a primary ventilation system in high occupant spaces such as classrooms.
KabanshiAWigöHSandbergM. Experimental evaluation of an intermittent air supply system – Part 1: thermal comfort and ventilation efficiency measurements. Build Environ2016; 95: 240–250.
2.
Berglund LG and Cain WS. Perceived air quality and the thermal environment. In: ASHRAE/SOEH conference IAQ 1989: Proceedings of the human equation: health and comfort, San Diego, CA, April 17–20 1989; pp. 93–99.
3.
KabanshiAWigöHLjungRSörqvistP. Human perception of room temperature and intermittent air jet cooling in a classroom. Indoor Built Environ2017; 26: 528–537.
4.
Kabanshi A and Wigö H. Experimental evaluation of an intermittent air supply system: cooling effect and associated energy savings. In: Indoor Air 2016: Proceedings of 14th international conference of indoor air quality and climate, Ghent, Belgium, July 3–8 2016, paper 154.
5.
KabanshiAWigöHLjungRSörqvistP. Experimental evaluation of an intermittent air supply system – Part 2: occupant perception of thermal climate. Build Environ2016; 108: 99–109.
6.
ToftumJ. Air movement – good or bad?Indoor Air2004; 14: 40–45.
7.
FountainMArensEA. Air movement and thermal comfort. ASHRAE J1993; 35: 26–30.
8.
RohlesFHWoodsJENevinsRG. The effect of air movement and temperature on the thermal sensations of sedentary man. ASHRAE Trans1974; 80: 101–119.
9.
McIntyreDA. Preferred air speeds for comfort in warm conditions. ASHRAE Trans1978; 84: 263–277.
10.
McIntyreDA. The effect of air movement on thermal comfort and sensation, Copenhagen, Denmark: Indoor Climate Danish Building Research Institute, 1979, pp. 541–560.
11.
TanabeSKimuraK. Effects of air temperature, humidity, and air movement on thermal comfort under hot and humid conditions. ASHRAE Trans1994; 100: 953–969.
12.
GriefahnBKünemundCGehringU. The significance of air velocity and turbulence intensity for responses to horizontal drafts in a constant air temperature of 23℃. Int J Ind Ergon2000; 26: 639–649.
13.
FangerPOMelikovAKHanzawaHRingJ. Air turbulence and sensation of draught. Energy Build1988; 12: 21–39.
14.
FangerPOChristensenNK. Perception of draught in ventilated spaces. Ergonomics1986; 29: 215–235.
15.
Xia Y, Zhao R and Xu W. Human thermal sensation to air movement frequency. In: Awbi HB (ed) ROOMVENT 2000: Proceedings of 7th international conference on air Distribution in rooms – ventilation for health and sustainable environment, Reading, UK, July 9–12 2000; Vol. 1, pp. 41–46.
16.
XiaYZNiuJLZhaoRYBurnettJ. Effects of turbulent air on human thermal sensations in a warm isothermal environment. Indoor Air2000; 10: 289–296.
17.
RohlesFHKonzSAJonesBW. Ceiling fans as extenders of the summer comfort envelope. ASHRAE Trans1983; 89: 245–263.
18.
Konz S, Al-Wahab S and Gough H. The effect of air velocity on thermal comfort. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Los Angeles, CA, USA, October 1 1983; Vol. 27, No. 8, pp.733–737.
19.
Tanabe S and Kimura K. Importance of air movements for thermal comfort under hot and humid conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ASHRAE far east conference on air conditioning in hot climates, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 25–28 1989; pp. 95–103.
20.
Fanger PO and Pedersen CJ. Discomfort due to air velocities in spaces. In: Meeting of commissions B1, B2, E4 of the international institute of refrigeration, Belgrade, June 2 1977; Vol. 1, pp. 289–296.
21.
Zhou G and Melikov AK. Equivalent frequency – a new parameter for description of frequency characteristics of airflow fluctuations. In: Melikov AK and Nielsen PV (eds) ROOMVENT 2002: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on air distribution in rooms, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 8–11 2002; Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2002, pp. 357–336.
22.
PasutWArensEZhangHZhaiY. Enabling energy-efficient approaches to thermal comfort using room air motion. Build Environ2014; 79: 13–19.
23.
ASHRAE 55-2013. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2013.
24.
CândidoCDe DearRJLambertsRBittencourtL. Air movement acceptability limits and thermal comfort in Brazil's hot humid climate zone. Build Environ2010; 45: 222–229.
25.
Toftum J, Zhou G and Melikov A. Effect of airflow direction on human perception of draught. In: Fanger PO (ed) Proceedings of CLIMA 2000, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 25–30 1985, Charlottenlund VVS Kongress – VVS Messe 1985, paper 366.
26.
Mayer E. New measurements of the convective heat transfer coefficients: influences of turbulence, mean air velocity and geometry of human body. In: ROOMVENT 1992: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on air distribution in rooms, Aalborg, Denmark, September 2–4 1992, DANVAK, Lyngby, Denmark, Vol. 3, pp. 263–276.
27.
HellwigRT. Perceived control in indoor environments: a conceptual approach. Build Res Inf2015; 43: 302–315.
28.
CabanacM. Physiological role of pleasure. Science1971; 173: 1103–1107.
ISO 7730:2005. Moderate thermal environment – determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2005.
33.
MelikovAKKaczmarczykJ. Air movement and perceived air quality. Build Environ2012; 47: 400–409.
34.
FangLClausenGFangerPO. Impact of temperature and humidity on the perception of indoor air quality. Indoor Air1998; 8: 80–90.
35.
LicinaDMelikovASekharCThamKW. Human convective boundary layer and its interaction with room ventilation flow. Indoor Air2015; 25: 21–35.
36.
LicinaDMelikovAPantelicJSekharCThamKW. Human convection flow in spaces with and without ventilation: personal exposure to floor-released particles and cough-released droplets. Indoor Air2015; 25: 672–682.
