Variables other than the physical existence of green space can affect its health benefits, including the residents' perceptions of the green space. In this study, factors associated with residents' perceptions and use of green space, as well as, their demands for green space to promote their use of such space were examined. The study focused on a deprived area in Jeonju City, Korea and used a mixed method design that involved both quantitative and qualitative components. The quantitative data from a cross-sectional survey of 1000 residents and the qualitative data from interviews with 30 residents were obtained. The results showed that the people in poorer socio-demographic and residential situations were more dependent on local green space, and good relationships between neighbours in this low-income area led to more frequent use of green space. The most important and fundamental requirements for green space are easy accessibility and safety. Also, physical and social activities must be promoted through the use of green space. As since green space can play a significant and positive social role in deprived neighbourhoods, both the quantity and quality of such spaces should be strongly considered as part of any revitalization efforts.
BooneCGBuckleyGLGroveJMSisterC. Parks and people: an environmental justice inquiry in Baltimorem Maryland. Assoc Am Geograph2009; 99: 767–787.
2.
LucyW. Equity and planning for local services. J Am Plan Assoc1981; 47: 447–457.
3.
NichollsS. Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: a case study using GIS. Managing Leisure2001; 6: 201–219.
4.
SisterCWolchJWilsonJ. Got green? Addressing environmental justice in park provision. Geo J2009; 75: 229–248.
5.
TalenE. Visualizing fairness: equity maps for planners. J Am Plan Assoc1998; 64: 22–38.
6.
MitchellRPophamF. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet2008; 372: 1655–1660.
7.
KuoFE. Coping with poverty: impacts of environment and attention in the inner-city. Environ Behav2001; 33: 5–34.
8.
CrawfordDTemperioAGiles-CortiBBallKHumeCRobertsRAndrianopoilosNSalmonJ. Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status?Health Place2008; 14: 889–893.
9.
EstabrooksPALeeREGyurcsikNC. Resources for physical activity participation: Does availability and accessibility differ by neighborhood socio-economic status?Ann Behav Med2003; 25: 100–104.
10.
HeynenNPerkinsHARoyP. The political ecology of uneven urban green space – the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Aff Rev2006; 42: 3–25.
11.
JonesAHillsdonMCoombesE. Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: Understanding the effects of area deprivation. Prevent Med2009; 49: 500–505.
12.
MitchellRPophamF. Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England. J Epidemiol Commun Health2007; 61: 681–683.
13.
SeamanPJJonesREllawayA. It's not just about the park, it's about integration too: why people choose to use or not use urban greenspaces. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2010; 7: 78.
14.
CABE. Community green: using local spaces to tackle inequality and improve health, London: CABE, 2010.
15.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSW. Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows”. Soc Psychol Quarter2004; 67: 319–342.
16.
WenMHawkleyLCCacioppoJT. Objective and perceived neighborhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated health: an analysis of older adults in Cook County, Illinois. Soc Sci Med2006; 63: 2575–2590.
17.
SchipperijnJEkholmbOStigsdotterUKToftagerMBentsenBKamper-JørgensenFRandrupTB. Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape Urban Plan2010; 95: 130–137.
18.
McCormackGRRockMTooheyAMHignellD. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. Health Place2010; 16: 712–726.
19.
GreeneJCCaracelliVJGrahamWF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal1989; 11: 255–274.
20.
KaczynskiAHendersonK. Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sci2007; 29: 315–354.
BrunswikE. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1956.
28.
MaasJvan DillenSMEVerheijRAGroenewegenPP. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health Place2009; 15: 586–595.
29.
SomervilleP. Explanations of social exclusion: where does housing fit in?Hous Stud1998; 13: 761–780.
30.
Bedimo-RungALMowenAJCohenDA. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. Am J Prevent Med2005; 28: 159–168.
31.
CABE. Urban green nation, London: CABE, 2010.
32.
CoombesEJonesAPHillsdonM. The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Soc Sci Med2010; 70: 816–822.
33.
KweonBSSullivanWCWileyA. Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environ Behav1998; 30: 823–858.
34.
Ambrey CL and Fleming CM. Public greenspace and life satisfaction in urban Australia. In: Contributed paper for presentation at the 56th AARES (Australian Agricultural & Resource Economics Society) annual conference, Fremantle, Western Australia, 7–10 February 2012; pp.1–38.
35.
KuoFESullivanWCWileyA. Fertile ground for community: inner-city neighbourhood common spaces. Am J Commun Psychol1998; 26: 823–851.
36.
PrettyGMHAndrewesLCollettC. Exploring adolescents' sense of community and its relationship to loniness. Am J Commun Psychol1994; 22: 346–358.
37.
PrezzaMAmiciMRobertiTTedeschiG. Sense of community referred to the whole town: its relations with neighboring, loneliness, life satisfaction, and area of residence. Am J Commun Psychol2001; 29: 29–52.
38.
FloridaRMellanderCStolarickK. Beautiful places: the role of perceived aesthetic beauty in community satisfaction. Reg Stud2011; 45: 33–48.
39.
VeitchJSalmonJBallK. Children's active free play in local neighborhoods: a behavioral mapping study. Health Educ Res2008; 23: 870–879.
40.
GearinEKahleC. Teen and adult perceptions of urban green space Los Angeles. Child Youth Environ2006; 16: 25–48.
41.
HillsdonMPanterJFosterCJonesA. The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health2006; 120: 1127–1132.
42.
DawsonJHillsdonMBollerIFosterC. Perceived barriers to walking in the neighborhood environment and change in physical activity levels over 12 months. Br J Sports Med2007; 41: 562–568.
43.
PowellKEMartinLMChowdhuryPP. Places to walk: convenience and regular physical activity. Am J Health Promot2003; 23: 43–50.
44.
WilburJChandlerPDancyBChoiJPlonczynskiD. Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity in urban, African-American women. Women Health2002; 36: 17–28.
45.
GidlowJGEllisNJ. Neighborhood green space in deprived urban communities: issues and barriers to use. Local Environ Int J Just Sustanabil2011; 16: 989–1002.
46.
AdamsAHarveyHBrownD. Constructs of health and environment inform child obesity prevention in American Indian communities. Obesity2008; 16: 311–317.
47.
VeitchJBagleySBallKSalmonJ. Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents' perceptions of influences on children's active free-play. Health Place2006; 12: 383–393.
48.
VeitchJSalmonJBallK. Children's perceptions of the use of public open spaces for active free-play. Children's Geograph2007; 5: 409–422.
49.
WilsonWJ. The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass and public policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
50.
Wilson JQ and Kelling GL. Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly March 1982, pp.29–38.
51.
LeeYSLeeDJAhnCHGuNE. Selection factors for outdoor sporting goods in Seoul. J Korean Inst Ecol Architect Environ2011; 11: 17–25.
52.
Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. Urban regeneration policy with consideration for the socio-economically disadvantaged, Anyang: KRIHS, 2010.
53.
TeoP. Space to grow old in: the availability of public spaces for elderly persons in Singapore. Urban Studies1997; 34: 413–439.
54.
LloydKBurdenJKievaJ. Young girls and urban parks: planning for transition through adolescence. J Park Recreat Admin2008; 26: 21–38.
55.
DayR. Local environments and older people's health: dimensions from a comparative qualitative study in Scotland. Health Place2008; 14: 299–312.
56.
KorpelaK. Negative mood and adult place preference. Environ Behav2003; 35: 331–346.
57.
UlrichRSSimonsRFLositoBDFioritoEMilesMAZelsonM. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol1991; 11: 201–230.
58.
KorpelaKYlenM. Perceived health is associated with visiting natural favorite places in the vicinity. Health Place2007; 13: 138–151.
