As daylight is dynamic, there is no one common solution for all scenarios. Understanding of sky conditions is the fundamental to effective daylighting. It is more critical in tropical climate where the sky is predominantly intermediate with inconsistent presence of direct sunlight (DSL). Thereby, daylighting performances of several light shelf configurations were experimented with physical scaled model under actual tropical sky conditions. External illuminance and indoor work plane illuminance (WPI) levels were measured concurrently in a reference model and a test model for comparisons. Daylight ratio or daylight factor and WPI uniformity ratio were computed for analysis. From the results, different optimum cases were identified for various sky conditions. Light shelves performed the best under intermediate sky with DSL from low angle. The highest improvement in WPI at deep room area and WPI uniformity were 24.87% and 364.96%, respectively. The performances of light shelves under overcast sky were better than light shelf under intermediate sky without DSL. This paper concluded that designing light shelf by responding to changeable sky conditions and DSL is more crucial than considering the façade orientations. Dynamic light shelf was proposed to configure the optimum cases for each tropical sky conditions.
RobbinsCL. Daylighting: design and analysis, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1986.
2.
LoewenJMLevineMDBuschJF. ASEAN-USAID building energy conservation project: final report-audit1992; Vol. III. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California.
3.
FranzettiCFraisseGAchardG. Influence of the coupling between daylight and artificial lighting on thermal loads in office buildings. Energy and Buildings2004; 36: 117–126.
4.
MayhoubMSCarterDJ. The costs and benefits of using daylight guidance to light office buildings. Building and Environment2010; 46: 698–710.
5.
KooSYYeoMSKimKW. Automated blind control to maximize the benefits of daylight in buildings. Building and Environment2010; 45: 1508–1520.
6.
Zain-AhmedASopianKOthmanMYHSayighAAMSurendranPN. Daylighting as a passive solar design strategy in tropical buildings: a case study of Malaysia. Energy Conversion and Management2002; 43: 1725–1736.
7.
BluyssenPM. Towards new methods and ways to create healthy and comfortable buildings. Building and Environment2010; 45: 808–818.
8.
TodorovicMSKimJT. Beyond the science and art of the healthy buildings daylighting dynamic control’s performance prediction and validation. Energy and Buildings2012; 46: 159–166.
9.
KonisK. Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit open-plan office building in San Francisco, California. Building and Environment2013; 59: 662–677.
10.
GalasiuADVeitchJA. Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy and Building2006; 38: 728–742.
11.
KimGKimJT. Healthy-daylighting design for the living environment in apartments in Korea. Building and Environment2010; 45: 287–294.
12.
AlzoubiHAl-RqaibatSBatainehRF. Pre-versus post-occupancy evaluation of daylight quality in hospitals. Building and Environment2010; 45: 2652–2665.
13.
ChoiJ-HBeltranLOKimH-S. Impacts of indoor daylight environments on patient average length of stay (ALOS) in a healthcare facility. Building and Environment2012; 50: 65–75.
14.
AnderGD. Daylighting performance and design, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2003.
15.
Lim YW. Internal shading for efficient tropical daylighting in high-rise open plan office. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia, 2011.
16.
Mohd Hamdan A. The influence of roof form and interior cross section on daylighting in the atrium spaces in Malaysia. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, 1996.
17.
Bülow-Hübe H. Energy-efficient window systems. PhD Thesis, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, 2001.
18.
Rahim R and Mulyadi R. Preliminary study of horizontal illuminance in Indonesia. In: 5th SENVAR, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia, December 10–12, 2004; pp.1-10.
19.
Zain-AhmedASopianKOthmanMYHAbidinZZ. The Availability of daylight from tropical skies: a case study of Malaysia. Renewable Energy2002; 25: 21–30.
20.
DjamilaHMingCCKumaresanS. Estimation of exterior vertical daylight for the humid tropic of Kota Kinabalu city in East Malaysia. Renewable Energy2011; 36: 9–15.
21.
Lim Y-W and Mohd Hamdan A. Daylight and users’ response in high rise open plan office: a case study of Malaysia. In: 3 rd international graduate conference on engineering, science, and humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia, November 2–4, 2010; pp.1-9.
22.
LimY-WMohd ZinKMohd HamdanAOssenDRAminatuzuhariahMA. Building façade design for daylighting quality in typical government office building. Building and Environment2012; 57: 194–204.
23.
SharifahFSFSiaSJ. Sunlight control and daylight distribution analysis: the KOMTAR case study. Building and Environment2004; 39: 713–717.
24.
TzempelikosAAthienitisAK. The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Solar Energy2007; 81: 369–382.
25.
ChengCLChenCLChouCPChanCY. A mini-scale modeling approach to natural daylight utilization in building design. Building and Environment2007; 42: 372–384.
26.
Dubois MC. Impact of solar shading devices on daylight quality: simulations with radiance. Research Report. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, 2001.
27.
Ossen DR. Optimum overhang geometry for high rise office building energy saving in tropical climates. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia, 2005.
28.
ShenHTzempelikosA. Daylighting and energy analysis of private offices with automated interior roller shades. Solar Energy2012; 86: 681–704.
29.
SanatiLUtzingerM. The effect of window shading design on occupant use of blinds and electric lighting. Building and Environment2013; 64: 67–76.
30.
HuJOlbinaS. Illuminance-based slat angle selection model for automated control of split blinds. Building and Environment2011; 46: 786–796.
31.
ShenHTzempelikosA. Sensitivity analysis on daylighting and energy performance of perimeter offices with automated shading. Building and Environment2013; 59: 303–314.
32.
MansourASopianKZain-AhmedAReimannG. Daylight distribution of a new design for future commercial office building in Malaysia. ISESCO Science and Technology Vision2006; 2(1): 53–56.
33.
HoMCChaingCMChouPCChangKFLeeCY. Optimal sun-shading design for enhanced daylight illumination of subtropical classrooms. Energy and Buildings2008; 40: 1844–1855.
34.
FreewanAAShaoLRiffatS. Optimizing performance of light shelf by modifying ceiling geometry in highly luminous climates. Solar Energy2008; 82: 343–353.
35.
FreewanAAShaoLRiffatS. Interactions between louvers and ceiling geometry for maximum daylighting performance. Renewable Energy2009; 34: 223–232.
36.
LimY-WMohd HamdanAOssenDR. Empirical validation of daylight simulation tool with physical model measurement. American Journal of Applied Sciences2010; 7(10): 1412–1419.
37.
BakerNVFanchiottiASteemersK. Daylighting in architecture: a European reference book, London: James & James, 1993.
ChouCP. The performance of daylighting with shading device in architecture design. Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering2004; 7(4): 205–212.
40.
KimC-SChungS-J. Daylighting simulation as an architectural design process in museums installed with toplights. Building and Environment2011; 46: 210–222.
41.
ArsenaultHHébertMDuboisM-C. Effects of glazing colour type on perception of daylight quality, arousal, and switch-on patterns of electric light in office rooms. Building and Environment2012; 56: 223–231.
42.
Department of Standards Malaysia. MS 1525: 2007. Malaysian standard: code of practice on energy efficiency and use of renewable energy for non-residential buildings. 1st Revision. Cyberjaya, Malaysia: Department of Standards Malaysia, 2007.
43.
LimY-WMohd HamdanAOssenDR. Internal shading for efficient tropical daylighting in Malaysian contemporary high-rise open plan office. Indoor and Built Environment2013; 22(6): 932–951.
44.
ZhangYBarrettP. Factors influencing occupants’ blind-control behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment2012; 54: 137–147.
45.
O’BrienWKapsisKAthienitisA. Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: a critical review. Building and Environment2013; 60: 319–338.
46.
GalasiuADVeitchJA. Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy and Building2006; 38: 728–742.
