Optimizing daylighting in lecture halls within hot-arid climates through modification of glazing systems with light-shelves: A parametric design approach
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2024
Optimizing daylighting in lecture halls within hot-arid climates through modification of glazing systems with light-shelves: A parametric design approach
This study focused on enhancing the balance between sufficient daylighting and heat mitigation in lecture halls, set within the challenging hot-arid climate of Saudi Arabia, through the optimization of window designs and the incorporation of light-shelves. To achieve this, a combination of in-detail Parametric Sensitivity Analyses (PSA) was performed in the first stage to find the best configuration of windows, while a multi-objective optimization (MOO) strategy was applied in the second stage considering multiple objectives in each stage. Before running both analyses, the simulation model was validated by field measurement. The optimization results show that the optimal window configurations obtained through PSA and MOO offer significant potential for improving daylighting performance, energy efficiency and comfort. In terms of the overall best solutions from PSA and MOO, the PSA demonstrated substantial improvements, with Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI) rising by 46.31% to 55.36%, glare decreasing by 52.17% to 82.61% and Energy Use Intensity (EUI) improving by 0.89% to 2.63%. Additionally, MOO solutions yielded even more significant enhancements, increasing UDI by 43.58% to 58.37%, reducing glare by 95% to 100% and enhancing EUI by 1.81% to 3.88%. This has resulted in a more evenly distributed and efficient daylighting throughout the space.
JafaryMWrightMShephardLGomezJNairRU (eds). Understanding campus energy consumption -- people, buildings and technology. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech). Kansas City, MO, 6–8 April 2016, pp. 68–72. DOI: 10.1109/GreenTech.2016.20.
2.
BarrettPDaviesFZhangYBarrettL. The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Build Environ2015; 89: 118–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013.
3.
BenfieldJARainboltGNBellPADonovanGH. Classrooms with nature views: evidence of differing student perceptions and behaviors. Environ Behav2013; 47(2): 140–157. DOI: 10.1177/0013916513499583.
4.
ZomorodianZSTahsildoostM. Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic metrics in predicting daylight availability and visual comfort in classrooms. Renew Energy2019; 134: 669–680. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.072.
5.
Al-TamimiNASyed FadzilSF. Thermal performance analysis for ventilated and unventilated glazed rooms in Malaysia (comparing simulated to field data). Indoor Built Environ2011; 20(5): 534–542.
6.
ChoJYooCKimY. Viability of exterior shading devices for high-rise residential buildings: case study for cooling energy saving and economic feasibility analysis. Energy Build2014; 82: 771–785. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.092.
7.
AbuzarifaNSFadzilSFSBahdadAAS, editors. Lighting enclosed interior corridors by borrowed daylight. In: AIP Conference Proceedings; 2021; National University of Civil Engineering, 55 Giai Phong Road, Hanoi, Vietnam, 27–28 October 2021: AIP Publishing LLC:030004. DOI: 10.1063/5.0070821.
8.
BahdadAASFadzilSFSOnubiHOBenLasodSA. Sensitivity analysis linked to multi-objective optimization for adjustments of light-shelves design parameters in response to visual comfort and thermal energy performance. J Build Eng2021; 44: 102996. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102996.
9.
DuTJansenSTurrinMvan den DobbelsteenA (eds). Impact of space layout on energy performance of office buildings coupling daylight with thermal simulation. In: E3S Web of Conferences: EDP Sciences. Published online 13 August 2019, 03077, Vol. 111, 2019. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201911103077.
10.
KonstantoglouMTsangrassoulisA. Dynamic operation of daylighting and shading systems: a literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016; 60: 268–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.246.
11.
MeresiA. Evaluating daylight performance of light shelves combined with external blinds in south-facing classrooms in Athens, Greece. Energy Build2016; 116: 190–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.009.
12.
AlsukkarMHuMEltaweelASuY. Daylighting performance improvements using of split louver with parametrically incremental slat angle control. Energy Build2022; 274: 112444. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112444.
13.
LeeHBaekSLeeH. A study on the application of solar modules to light shelves to improve generation and daylighting efficiency. Energy Build2022; 261: 111976. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111976.
14.
ZiaeeNVakilinezhadR. Multi-objective optimization of daylight performance and thermal comfort in classrooms with light-shelves: case studies in Tehran and Sari, Iran. Energy Build2022; 254: 111590. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111590.
15.
Salem BahdadAASyed FadzilSFOnubiHOBenLasodSA. Balancing daylight in office spaces with respect to the indoor thermal environment through optimization of light shelves design parameters in the tropics. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(7): 1963–1985. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X221086537.
16.
ZhaiYWangYHuangYMengX. A multi-objective optimization methodology for window design considering energy consumption, thermal environment and visual performance. Renew Energy2019; 134: 1190–1199. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.024.
17.
MangkutoRARohmahMAsriAD. Design optimisation for window size, orientation, and wall reflectance with regard to various daylight metrics and lighting energy demand: a case study of buildings in the tropics. Appl Energy2016; 164: 211–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.046.
18.
MagnierLHaghighatF. Multiobjective optimization of building design using TRNSYS simulations, genetic algorithm, and Artificial Neural Network. Build Environ2010; 45(3): 739–746. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.016.
19.
NguyenA-TReiterSRigoP. A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Appl Energy2014; 113: 1043–1058. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.061.
20.
MachairasVTsangrassoulisAAxarliK. Algorithms for optimization of building design: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 31: 101–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.036.
21.
CiardielloARossoFDell'OlmoJCiancioVFerreroMSalataF. Multi-objective approach to the optimization of shape and envelope in building energy design. Appl Energy2020; 280: 115984. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115984.
22.
DelgarmNSajadiBDelgarmSKowsaryF. A novel approach for the simulation-based optimization of the buildings energy consumption using NSGA-II: case study in Iran. Energy Build2016; 127: 552–560. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.052.
23.
WangRLuSFengW. A three-stage optimization methodology for envelope design of passive house considering energy demand, thermal comfort and cost. Energy2020; 192: 116723. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116723.
24.
GouSNikVMScartezziniJ-LZhaoQLiZ. Passive design optimization of newly-built residential buildings in Shanghai for improving indoor thermal comfort while reducing building energy demand. Energy Build2018; 169: 484–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.095.
25.
EltaweelASuY. Parametric design and daylighting: a literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 73: 1086–1103. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.011.
26.
BahdadASyed FadzilSTaibN. Evaluating kinetic light-shelves and their impacts on daylighting performance Indonesian. J Electr Eng Comput Sci2020; 19: 482–490. DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i1.pp476-484.
27.
BahdadAAFadzilSS. Light-shelves technique (LST) for daylight enhancement using physical scaled-model and simulation approaches. 7th Putrajaya International Built Environment, Technology and Engineering Conference (PIBEC7). Kuala Lumpur Malaysia14–15 Oct 2019, pp. 68–81.
28.
BahdadAAFadzilSSTaibN. Enhancing daylight distribution in deep-plan office buildings in Malaysia through the integration of light-shelves techniques. J Recent Activities in Architectural Sci2019; 4(2): 40–66.
29.
SabbaghMMandourahSHareriR. Light shelves optimization for daylight improvement in typical public classrooms in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability2022; 14(20): 13297.
30.
Ebrahimi-MoghadamAIldarabadiPAliakbariKFadaeeF. Sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization of energy consumption and thermal comfort by using interior light shelves in residential buildings. Renew Energy2020; 159: 736–755. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.127.
31.
LimY-WAhmadMHOssenDR. Internal shading for efficient tropical daylighting in Malaysian contemporary high-rise open plan office. Indoor Built Environ2013; 22(6): 932–951. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X12463024.
32.
LimY-WHengC. Dynamic internal light shelf for tropical daylighting in high-rise office buildings. Build Environ2016; 106: 155–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.030.
33.
LittlefairPJ. Light shelves: computer assessment of daylighting performance. Int J Light Res Technol1995; 27(2): 79–91. DOI: 10.1177/14771535950270020201.
34.
MangkutoRAFeradiFPutraREAtmodipoeroRTFaveroF. Optimisation of daylight admission based on modifications of light shelf design parameters. J Build Eng2018; 18: 195–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.007.
35.
MoazzeniMHGhiabaklouZMoazzeniMHGhiabaklouZ. Investigating the influence of light shelf geometry parameters on daylight performance and visual comfort, a case study of educational space in tehran, Iran. Buildings2016; 6(3): 26. DOI: 10.3390/buildings6030026.
36.
ZazziniPRomanoADi LorenzoAPortaluriVDi CrescenzoA. Experimental analysis of the performance of light shelves in different geometrical configurations through the scale model approach. J Daylighting2020; 7(1): 37–56. DOI: 10.15627/jd.2020.4.
37.
LeeHSeoJKimS. Improvement of light-shelf performance through the use of a diffusion sheet. Build Environ2018; 144: 248–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.040.
38.
CheongKHTeoYHKohJMAcharyaURYuSCM. A simulation-aided approach in improving thermal-visual comfort and power efficiency in buildings. J Build Eng2020; 27: 100936. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100936.
39.
MoazzeniMHGhiabaklouZ. Investigating the influence of light shelf geometry parameters on daylight performance and visual comfort, a case study of educational space in tehran, Iran. Buildings2016; 6(3): 26. DOI: 10.3390/buildings6030026.
40.
XuWChongAKaraguzelOTLamKP. Improving evolutionary algorithm performance for integer type multi-objective building system design optimization. Energy Build2016; 127: 714–729. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.043.
41.
QahtanAM. Daylight illuminance in classrooms adjacent to covered and uncovered courtyards under the clear sky of najran city, Saudi Arabia. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research2019; 24(4): 1–10.
42.
QahtanAMEbrahimDAAhmedHM. Energy-saving potential of daylighting in the atria of colleges in najran university, Saudi Arabia. Int J Built Environ Sustainability2019; 7(1): 47–55. DOI: 10.11113/ijbes.v7.n1.421.
43.
PoolDAC. A comprehensive evaluation of perforated façades for daylighting and solar shading performance: effects of matrix, thickness and separation distance. J Daylighting2019; 6(2): 97–111. DOI: 10.15627/jd.2019.10.
44.
ReinhartCFAndersenM. Development and validation of a Radiance model for a translucent panel. Energy Build2006; 38(7): 890–904. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.006.
45.
NabilAMardaljevicJ. Useful daylight illuminances: a replacement for daylight factors. Energy Build2006; 38(7): 905–913. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013.
46.
BahdadAASFadzilSFSOnubiHOBenLasodSA. Multi-dimensions optimization for optimum modifications of light-shelves parameters for daylighting and energy efficiency. Int J Environ Sci Technol2021; 19(4): 2659–2676. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03328-9.
47.
CantinFDuboisM-C. Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity. Light Res Technol2011; 43(3): 291–307. DOI: 10.1177/1477153510393319.
48.
CarlucciSCattarinGCausoneFPaglianoL. Multi-objective optimization of a nearly zero-energy building based on thermal and visual discomfort minimization using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Energy Build2015; 104: 378–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.064.
49.
MardaljevicJHeschongLLeeE. Daylight metrics and energy savings. Light Res Technol2009; 41(3): 261–283. DOI: 10.1177/1477153509339703.
50.
AyoubM. Integrating illuminance and energy evaluations of cellular automata controlled dynamic shading system using new hourly-based metrics. Sol Energy2018; 170: 336–351. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.041.
51.
PilechihaPMahdavinejadMPour RahimianFCarnemollaPSeyedzadehS. Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency. Appl Energy2020; 261: 114356. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356.
52.
KhaniAKhakzandMFaiziM. Multi-objective optimization for energy consumption, visual and thermal comfort performance of educational building (case study: qeshm Island, Iran). Sustain Energy Technol Assessments2022; 54: 102872. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102872.
53.
ZhangABokelRvan den DobbelsteenASunYHuangQZhangQ. Optimization of thermal and daylight performance of school buildings based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the cold climate of China. Energy Build2017; 139: 371–384. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.048.
54.
AcostaICampanoMÁMolinaJF. Window design in architecture: analysis of energy savings for lighting and visual comfort in residential spaces. Appl Energy2016; 168: 493–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.005.
55.
ChiDAMorenoDNavarroJ. Design optimisation of perforated solar façades in order to balance daylighting with thermal performance. Build Environ2017; 125: 383–400. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.09.007.
56.
MangkutoRASiregarMAAHandinaA. Determination of appropriate metrics for indicating indoor daylight availability and lighting energy demand using genetic algorithm. Sol Energy2018; 170: 1074–1086. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.025.
57.
MotamediSLiedlP. Integrative algorithm to optimize skylights considering fully impacts of daylight on energy. Energy Build2017; 138: 655–665. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.045.
58.
ReinhartCFWeissmanDA. The daylit area–Correlating architectural student assessments with current and emerging daylight availability metrics. Build Environ2012; 50: 155–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.10.024.
59.
BianYLuoT. Investigation of visual comfort metrics from subjective responses in China: a study in offices with daylight. Build Environ2017; 123: 661–671. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.035.
60.
WienoldJChristoffersenJ. Towards a new daylight glare rating. Berlin: Lux Europa, 2005, pp. 157–161.
61.
KonstantzosITzempelikosAChanY-C. Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades. Build Environ2015; 87: 244–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.007.
62.
WienoldJ. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation. In: Building Simulation, Eleventh International IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 27–30 Jul 2009, pp. 944–951.
63.
ValitabarMMoghimiMMahdavinejadMPilechihaP. Design optimum responsive façade based on visual comfort and energy performance. In: 23rd International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia: Learning, Prototyping and Adapting. Beijing, China, 17–19 May 2018: CAADRIA, pp. 93–102. DOI: 10.52842/conf.caadria.2018.2.093.
64.
WagdyAFathyF. A parametric approach for achieving optimum daylighting performance through solar screens in desert climates. J Build Eng2015; 3: 155–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2015.07.007.
65.
BakmohammadiPNoorzaiE. Optimization of the design of the primary school classrooms in terms of energy and daylight performance considering occupants’ thermal and visual comfort. Energy Rep2020; 6: 1590–1607. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.008.
66.
ReinhartCFWalkenhorstO. Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy Build2001; 33(7): 683–697. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5.
67.
KimHClaytonMJ. A multi-objective optimization approach for climate-adaptive building envelope design using parametric behavior maps. Build Environ2020; 185: 107292. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107292.
68.
LuSLinBWangC. Investigation on the potential of improving daylight efficiency of office buildings by curved facade optimization. Build Simulat2020; 13(2): 287–303. DOI: 10.1007/s12273-019-0586-5.
69.
JalaliZNoorzaiEHeidariS. Design and optimization of form and façade of an office building using the genetic algorithm. Sci Technol Built Environ2020; 26(2): 128–140. DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2019.1624095.
70.
WangRLuSFengW. Impact of adjustment strategies on building design process in different climates oriented by multiple performance. Appl Energy2020; 266: 114822. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114822.
71.
FangYChoS. Design optimization of building geometry and fenestration for daylighting and energy performance. Sol Energy2019; 191: 7–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.039.
72.
LiuDSunYWilsonRWuY. Comprehensive evaluation of window-integrated semi-transparent PV for building daylight performance. Renew Energy2020; 145: 1399–1411. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.167.
73.
KharvariF. An empirical validation of daylighting tools: assessing radiance parameters and simulation settings in Ladybug and Honeybee against field measurements. Sol Energy2020; 207: 1021–1036. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.054.
74.
BahdadAASFadzilSFSTaibN. Optimization of daylight performance based on controllable light-shelf parameters using genetic algorithms in the tropical climate of Malaysia. J Daylighting2020; 7(1): 122–136. DOI: 10.15627/jd.2020.10.
75.
WarrierGARaphaelB. Performance evaluation of light shelves. Energy Build2017; 140: 19–27.
