As the UK and Scottish governments aim for zero-carbon housing, with tightly sealed building envelopes becoming paramount, indoor air quality (IAQ) and its implications for health has become a concern. This context relates to a 2008–2011 study, ‘Environmental Assessment of Domestic Laundering’, concerning the prevalence of passive indoor drying (PID). Assessment of PID impacts, shaped by built and social context including occupants’ habits and trends, draws on monitored data from 22 case studies out of a wider survey of 100 dwellings in Glasgow. The smaller group included analysis of air samples and provided scenarios for enhanced dynamic modelling via laboratory work on moisture buffering. The evidence suggests PID has important implications for energy consumption and IAQ; in the latter case because moisture levels are likely to boost dust mite populations and concentrations of airborne mould spores. Thus, findings indicate possible negative impacts on health, and the paper recommends amended standards allied to design guidance for improved practice, as well as further work related to volatile organic compounds.
PorteousCDASharpeTRMenonRAShearerDMusaHBakerPHSandersCHStrachanPAKellyNJMarkopoulosA. Energy and environmental appraisal of domestic laundering appliances. Build Res Inf2012; 40(6): 679–699.
2.
StrachanP. Simulation support for performance testing of building components. Build Environ2008; 43(2): 228–236.
3.
PorteousCDACh. 8 Sensing a low-CO2 historic future. In: MazzeoNA (eds). Chemistry, emission control, radioactive pollution and indoor air quality. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech, 2011, pp. 216–217. in 213–246.
4.
Carnelley T, Haldane JS and Anderson AM. IV. The carbonic acid, organic matter, and micro-organisms in air, more especially of dwellings and schools. Philos Trans Roy Soc 1887; Ser B 178: 71–72 in 61–111.
5.
ShoveEChanging human behaviour and lifestyle: a challenge for sustainable consumption? In: ReischLARöpkeI (eds). The ecological economics of consumption, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004, pp. 111–131.
6.
Shove E. Ch. 7 Laundering: a system of systems and Ch. 8 Laundry habits: integrating practices. In: Comfort, cleanliness + convenience, the social organization of normality. Oxford and New York: Berg, 2003, pp.117–157.
7.
ShoveE. Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. J Consum Policy2003; 26: 395–418.
8.
Isaksson C. From a passive to an active house. In: World Renewable Energy Congress 2011, May 8–13, 2003, Linköping, Sweden, pp.1789–1796.
9.
HazasMFridayAScottJ. Look back before leaping forward: four decades of domestic energy inquiry. IEEE Pervasive Computing2011; 10(1): 13–19.
10.
Karresand H. The wrench in the works: household behaviour and why energy efficient buildings are not enough. In: 2012 ACEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings: fully our future with energy efficiency, August 12–17, 2011, Pacific Grove, California, pp.7.114–7.125.
11.
Hasselaar E. Health risk associated with passive houses: an exploration. In: Indoor air 2008, the 11th international conference on indoor air quality and climate, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 17–22, 2008, paper ID 689.
12.
AndersenRVToftumJAndersenKKOlesenBW. Survey of occupant behaviour and control of indoor environment in Danish Dwellings. Energy Build2009; 41: 11–16.
13.
KnudsenHNValbjørnONielsenPA. Determination of exposure-response relationships for emissions from building products. Indoor Air1998; 8: 264–275.
14.
WilkinsKWolkoffPKnudsenHNClausenPA. The impact of information on perceived air quality – ‘organic’ vs. ‘synthetic’ building materials. Indoor Air2007; 17: 130–134.
15.
Larsen TS, Knudsen HN, Kanstrup AM, Christiansen E, Gram-Hanssen K, Mosgaard M, Brohus H, Heiselberg P and Rose J. Occupants influence on the energy consumption of Danish domestic buildings – state of the art. DCE Technical Report No 110. Aalborg University, Department for Civil Engineering, Section for Architectural Engineering, 2010.
16.
Platts-MillsTAEDe WeckAL. Dust mite allergens and asthma – a worldwide problem. J Allergy Clin Immunol1989; 83: 416–427.
17.
Niven RM, Fletcher AM, Pickering AC, Custovic A, Sivour JB, Preece AR, Oldham LA and Francis HC. Attempting to control mite allergens with mechanical ventilation and dehumidification in British houses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 17(103): 756–762.
18.
ArlianLGVeselicaMM. Re-evaluation of the humidity requirements of the house dust-mites Dermatatophagoides farinae. J Med Entomol1981; 18: 351–351.
19.
ArlianLG. Water balance and humidity requirements of the house dust-mites. Exp Appl Acarol1992; 16: 15–15.
20.
CunninghamMJ. Direct measurements of temperature and humidity in dust mite microhabitats. Clin Exp Allergy1998; 28: 1104–1102.
21.
De BoerRKullerK. Mattresses as a winter refuge for house-dust mite populations. Allergy1997; 52: 290–305.
22.
CrowtherDWilkinsonTBiddulphPOreszczynTPretloveSRidleyI. A simple model for predicting the effect of hygrothermal conditions on populations of house dust mite. Exp Appl Acarol2006; 39: 127–148.
23.
Samson RA, Hockstra ES, Frisvad JC and Filtenberg O. Introduction to food- and airborne fungi. Utrecht, Netherlands: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, 2002.
24.
RousselSRebouxGBellangerA-PSorninSGrenouilletFDalphinJ-CPiarrouxRMillonL. Characteristics of dwellings contaminated by moulds. J Environ Monitor2008; 10: 724–729.
25.
Appleby A. Ch. C1 Indoor air quality and ventilation requirements. In: Buildings and health, the Rosehaugh guide to the design, construction, use and management of buildings. London: RIBA Publications Ltd, 1990, 176 in pp.167–193.
26.
Naydenov K, Barankova P, Sundell J and Melikov A. Distribution of carbon dioxide produced by people in a room: Part 2 – field study. In: 9th international conference on air distribution in rooms, ROOMVENT 2004, Coimbra, Portugal, 2004. ISBN 972-97973-2-3.
27.
Steiger S, Hellwig RT and Junker E. Distribution of carbon dioxide in a naturally ventilated room with high internal heat load. In: Proceedings of indoor air 2008, 11th international conference on indoor air quality and climate, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 17–22, 2008, paper 397.
28.
Anderson BR, Clark AJ, Baldwin R and Milbank NO. BREDEM – BRE domestic energy model: background, philosophy and description. Garston: BRE, Department of the Environment, 1985.
29.
SBSA. 6.1 Carbon dioxide emissions and 6.2 Building insulation envelope. In: Technical Handbooks 2007 (TH07). Livingston: Scottish Building Standards Agency, 2007.
30.
Kelly NJK, Markopoulos A and Strachan PA. Environmental assessment of domestic laundering: final modelling report. Energy Systems Research Unit, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, 2012. www.homelaundrystudy.net.
31.
DEFRA. 2011 Guidelines to Defra/DECC’s GHG conversion factors for company reporting: methodology paper for emission factors, 2011, pp.14 and 17. www.defra.gov.uk.
32.
DEFRA. Briefing note BNW06: assumptions underlying the energy projections for domestic tumble driers. Market Transformation Programme, 2008; first created 25/05/06, updated 13/08/07, last reviewed 18/01/08.
33.
HaasDHabibJGallerHBuzinaWSchlacherRMarthEReinthalerFF. Assessment of indoor air in Austrian apartments with and without visible mold growth. Atmos Environ2007; 41: 5192–5201.
34.
Viitanen H and Ojanen T. Improved model to predict mold growth in building materials. In: Thermal performance of the exterior envelopes of buildings X, proceedings of ASHRAE THERM X, Clearwater, Florida, USA, December 2007, 5th of 8 pages.
35.
Nevalainen A. Microbial contamination of buildings. In: Indoor Air ’93, Helsinki, Finland, July 4–8, 1993, 4: 3–11.
36.
GarrettMHRaymentPRHooperMAAbramsonMJHooperBM. Indoor airborne fungal spores, house dampness and associations with environmental factors and respiratory health in children. J Appl Bacteriol1998; 70: 61S–73S.
37.
FlanniganBMillerJDCh. 2.1 Microbial growth in indoor environments. In: FlanniganBSamsonRAMillerJD (eds). Microorganisms in home and indoor work environments, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001, pp. 39–39.
38.
ParkJ-HCox-GanserJMKreissKWhiteSKRaoCY. Hydrophilic fungi and ergosterol associated with respiratory illness in a water-damaged building. Environ Health Persp2008; 116(1): 45–50.
39.
SamsonRAHoubrakenJSummerbellRCFlanniganBMillerJDCh. 5 Common and important species of Actinomycetes and fungi in indoor environments. In: FlanniganBSamsonRAMillerJD (eds). Microorganisms in home and indoor work environments, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001, pp. 340–345. in pp.287–473.
40.
HerbarthOSchlinkUMüllerARichterM. Spatiotemporal distribution of airborne mould spores in apartments. Mycol Res2003; 107(11): 1361–1371.
41.
Cunniffe HR. Environmental determinants of allergens in different flooring materials and the influence of vacuum cleaning on this and airborne allergen concentrations. PhD Thesis, Coventry University (in collaboration with University of Worcester), UK, 2006, pp.66, 145–150, 219–222, 242–243, 246–58, 310.
42.
Hung L-L, Miller JD and Dillon HK. Field guide for the determination of biological contaminants in environmental samples. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Falls Church, Virginia, USA, 2005.
AndersenBFrisvadJCSondergaardIRasmussenISLarsenLS. Associations between fungal species and water-damaged building materials. Appl Environ Microbiol2011; 77(12): 4180–4188.
45.
ThrasherJDCrawleyS. The biocontaminants and complexity of damp indoor spaces: more than what meets the eyes. Toxicol Ind Health2009; 25(9–10): 583–615.
46.
ASHRAE. Ch. 11 Physiological factors in drying and storing farm crops. In 2005 ASHRAE handbook – fundamentals (SI), ASHRAE, 2005, p.11.2 in pp.11.1–11.18.
47.
WHO. 2. Building dampness and its effect on indoor exposure to biological and non-biological pollutants; 2.1 effects of dampness on the quality of the indoor environment. In: WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould. World Health Organization, 2009, p.12 in pp.9–13.
48.
Angell WJ. and Olson WW. Moisture sources associated with potential damage in cold climate housing. In: CD-F0-3405-1988. St. Paul, MN: Cold Climate Housing Information Center, University of Minnesota, 1988.
49.
TenWolde A and Pilon CL. The effect of indoor humidity on water vapor release in homes. In: Proceedings of buildings x conference, Atlanta, December 2–7, 2007. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, pp.1–9.
50.
Adan OCG. On the fungal defacement of interior finishes. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University, The Netherlands, 1994.
51.
Ginkel JTV and Hasselaar E. Housing characteristics predicting mould growth in bathrooms. In: Indoor air 2005, 10th international conference on indoor air, Beijing, China, September 4–9, 2005, pp.2425–2429.
52.
Straube JF and deGraauw JP. Indoor air quality and hygroscopically active materials. ASHRAE Trans 2001; 107(Pt 1): 8th of 19 pages.
53.
Institute of Medicine. Executive Summary and Ch 5 Indoor Biologic Exposures. In: Clearing the air, asthma and indoor exposures. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 2000, 5 in pp.1–18 and 144, 173 in pp.105–222.
54.
BeezholdDHGreenBJBlachereFMSchmechelDWeissmanDNVelickoffDHoganMBWilsonNW. Prevalence of allergic sensitization to indoor fungi in West Virginia. Allergy Asthma Proc2008; 29(1): 29–34.
NielsenKF. Mytoxin production by indoor molds. Fungal Genet Biol2003; 39: 103–117.
57.
PerdomoHSuttonDAGarciaDFothergillAWCanoJGenéJSummerbellRCRinaldiMGGuarroJ. Spectrum of clinically relevant Acremonium species in the United States. J Clin Microbiol2001; 49(1): 243–256.
VijayHBurtonMYoungNMCopelandDFCorletteM. Allergenic components of isolates of Cladosporium herbarum. Grana1991; 30: 161–165.
60.
CramerRARiveraAHohlTM. Immune responses against Aspergillus fumigatus: what have we learned?Curr Opin Infect Dis2011; 24: 315–322.
61.
SegalBH. Aspergillosis. New Engl J Med2009; 360: 1870–1884.
62.
LeinoMMäkeläMReijulaKHaatelaTMussalo-RauhamaaHTuomiTHintikkaELAleniusH. Intranasal exposure to a damp building Mould, Stachybotrys chartarum, induces lung inflammation in mice by satratoxin-independent mechanisms. Clin Exp Allergy2003; 33(11): 1603–1610.
63.
Leino M. Damp building moulds: assessment of sensitization in patients and studies into mechanisms of airway inflammation using experimental models. PhD Thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2006.
64.
LeinoMSAleniusHTFyhrquist-VanniNWolffHJReijulaKEHintikkaE-LSalkinoja-SalonenMSHaatelaTMäkeläM. Intranasal exposure to Stachybotrys chartarum enhances airway inflammation in allergic mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2006; 173(5): 512–518.
65.
SinghJ. Toxic moulds and indoor air quality. Indoor Built Environ2005; 14(3–4): 229–234.
66.
ForgaesJCarllWT. Mycotoxicosis. Adv Vet Sci1962; 7: 273–293.
67.
JarvisBBChemistry and toxicology of mould isolated from water damaged buildings. In: De VriesJWTrucknessMJacksonLS (eds). Mytoxins and food safety, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002, pp. 42–52.
68.
JarvisBBSorensenWGHintikkaE-LNikulinMParkkaPEtzelRADearbornDG. Toxigenic molds in water-damaged buildings: decholorogriseofulvins from Memnoniella echinata. J Nat Prod1996; 59(6): 553–554.
69.
JürgensenCWMadsenAM. Exposure to the airborne mould Botrytis and its health effects. Ann Agric Environ Med2009; 16: 183–196.
70.
NiedoszytkoMChelminskaMJassemECzestochowskaE. Association between sensitization to Aureobasidium Pullulans (Pullularia sp) and severity of asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol2007; 98: 153–156.
71.
GrantCHunterCAFlanniganBBraveryAF. The moisture requirements of moulds isolated from domestic dwellings. Int Biodeter Biodegr1989; 25: 259–284.
72.
NucciMAkitiTBarreirosGSilveiraFRevankarSGSuttonDAPattersonDF. Nosocomila fungemia due to Exophilia jeanselmei var. jeanselmei and a Rhinocladiella species: newly described causes of bloodstream infection. J Clin Microbiol2001; 39(2): 514–518.
HopeRAldredDMaganN. Comparison of environmental profiles for growth and deoxynivalenol production by Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum on wheat grain. Lett Appl Microbiol2005; 40(4): 295–300.
75.
SchwabeMKrämerA. Influence of water activity on the production of T-2 toxin by Fusarium sporotrichioides. Myotoxin Res1995; 11(1): 48–52.
76.
PlazaPUsallJTeixidóNViñasI. Effect of water activity and temperature on germination and growth of Penicilium digitatum, P. italicum and Geotrichum candidum. J Appl Microbiol2003; 94(4): 549–554.
77.
HameedAAAYasserIHKhoderIM. Indoor air quality during renovation actions: a case study. J Environ Monit2004; 6: 740–744.
78.
LiD-WYangCS. Notes on indoor fungi 1: new records and noteworthy fungi from indoor environments. Mycotaxon2004; 89(2): 473–488.
79.
PrezantBWeekesDMillerJD. Recognition, evaluation and control of indoor mold, Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association, 2008.
80.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Health Protection Act, Instructions regarding physical, chemical and biological factors in housing. Guidebook No 1, Finland (in Finnish), 2003.
81.
ReponenTNevalainenAJantunenNPellikkaMKalliokoskiP. Normal range criteria for indoor air bacteria and fungal spores in a subarctic climate. Indoor Air1992; 2: 26–31.
Florian M-L, Koestler RJ, Nicholson K, Parker TA, Stanley T, Szczepanowska H and Wagner S. Ch. 12 Mold/fungi in Ninth edition paper conservation catalog. Washington, DC: The Book and Paper Group of the American Institute for the Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, 1994, 4 in pp.1–39.
84.
Kilroy C, Lagerstedt A, Davey A and Robinson K. Studies on the survivability of the invasive diatom Didymosphenia geminata under a range of environmental and chemical conditions. NWA Client Report: CHC2006-116. Christchurch, New Zealand: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, 2006, revised 2007, p. 9, 11, 13 and 18 in pp.1–110.
85.
RichardsTATalbotNJ. Plant parasitic oomycetes such as Phytophthhora species contain genes derived from three eukaryotic lineages. Plant Signal Behav2007; 2(2): 112–114.
86.
Porteous CDA, Sharpe TR, MenonR, Shearer D and Musa H, with Baker PH, Sanders C, Strachan PA, Kelly NJ and Markopoulos A. Environmental assessment of domestic laundering: final technical report project module 1. Mackintosh Environmental Research Unit, The Glasgow School of Art, 2012. www.homelaundrystudy.net.
87.
ArundelAVSterlingEMBigginJHSterlingTD. Indirect health effects of relative humidity in indoor environments. Environ Health Persp1986; 65: 351–361.
88.
Steinemann AC, Gallagher LG, Davis A and MacGregor IC. Chemical emissions from residential dryer vents during use of fragranced laundry products. Air Quality Atmos Health 2008; 6(1): 151–156.
CaressMSSteinemannAC. Prevalence of fragrance sensitivity in the American population. J Environ Health2009; 71(7): 46–50.
91.
Menon R and Porteous C. Design guide: healthy low energy home laundering. MEARU (Mackintosh Environmental Architecture Research Unit), Glasgow: The Glasgow School of Art, 2011. ISBN 978-0-9571595-0-1, www.homelaundrystudy.net.
92.
UcciMBiddulphPOreszczynTCrowtherDWilkinsonTPretloveSECHartBRidleyI. Application of a transient hygrothermal population model for house dust mites in beds: assessment of control strategies in UK buildings. J Build Perform Simulat2011; 4(3): 285–300.
93.
DEFRA. Briefing note IBNW24: innovation briefing note on domestic laundry drying products, Version 1.3, Market Transformation Programme, 2008: first created 07/02/07, updated 31/01/08, last reviewed 31/01/08.
94.
Porteous C and MacGregor K. Ch 4 Adaptive control and Ch 8 Machine control. In: Solar architecture in cool climates. London: Earthscan, 2005, pp.91–118 and 184–191.
95.
MenonRPorteousMusaH. Economic and environmental impact of communal laundry spaces in high density housing in the UK. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain2010; 6(2): 191–202.
96.
Porteous CDA and Menon R. Displacing electrical energy for drying domestic laundry by practical solar upgrades – proposed Glasgow housing case studies. In: Proceedings of EuroSun 2010, Graz, Austria, September 28–October 1, 2010.
97.
Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Task Group. Mechanical ventilation with heat recovery in new homes. Interim Report, January 2012. Milton Keynes, UK: Zero Carbon Hub, NHBC Foundation, 47 pages.
98.
Van der Pluijm WMP. The robustness and effectiveness of mechanical ventilation in airtight dwellings. Master’s Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, 2010.
99.
VereekenERoelsSJanssenH. In situ determination of the moisture buffer potential of room enclosures. J Build Phys2009; 34(3): 223–246.
100.
JanssenHRoelsS. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of interior moisture buffering by enclosures. Energy Build2009; 41: 382–394.
