This study numerically investigated the influences of ventilation designs on pollutant removal in a large space with multiple pollutant sources. The types of ventilation include general displacement and local exhaust ventilation with either partitioned or non-partitioned working field. The study demonstrated that the outlet positions and outlet flow rate distribution for local exhaust ventilation are more important than those of the general displacement type. It would be more effective to design local exhaust by placing the outlets on the midstream and downstream of the machines rather than on all the machines. The results also demonstrated that the effect of local exhaust type would not be more superior to the general displacement type due to the large space in plant and multiple pollutant sources such as oil gas pollutant source, mist of metalworking fluid, etc.
Sheehan M, Newman L, O'Brien D, Teitelbaum D: Metalworking fluids: Safety and health best practices manual. OSHA Metalworking Fluids Standards Advisory Committee Final Report, 1999.
2.
AdlerDPHiiWWSMichalekDJSutherlandJW: Examining the role of cutting fluids in machining and efforts to address associated environmental/health concerns: Machining Sci Technol2006;10(1):23–58.
3.
LoomansMGLCvan HoudtWLemaireADHensenJLM: Performance assessment of an operating theatre design using CFD simulation and tracer gas measurements: Indoor Built Environ2008;17(4):299–312.
4.
WangFJLaiCMZhengYR: The influence of alternative layouts for air-circulation on airflow patterns in the processing area of a cleanroom: Indoor Built Environ2009;18(1):24–31.
5.
LiXZhuF: Response coefficient: A new concept to evaluate ventilation performance with pulse boundary conditions: Indoor Built Environ2009;18(3):189–204.
6.
TianLLinZWangQLiuJ: Numerical investigation of indoor aerosol particle dispersion under stratum ventilation and under displacement ventilation: Indoor Built Environ2009;18(4):360–375.
7.
CalogineDBoyerHNdoumbeSRiviereCMiranvilleF: Identification of parameters in building concentration dispersion model: Indoor Built Environ2010;19(2):250–266.
8.
ZhouJKimCN: Numerical investigation of indoor CO2 concentration distribution in an apartment: Indoor Built Environ2011;20(1):91–100.
9.
HamaGM: Saving Air and Energy in Industrial Plants: HPAC1974;46:65–70.
10.
ThielGR: Recycling plant air, energy engineering: JAEE1982;79:12–39.
11.
GoldfieldJ: Contaminant reduction: General vs. local exhaust ventilation: HPAC1985;57:47–51.
12.
HeinsohnRJHsiehandKCMerkleCL: Lateral ventilation systems for open vessels: ASHRAE Trans1985;91:361–382.
13.
GodishTRouchJMcClureDElrodLSeaverC: Ventilation system performance in a new classroom building assessed by measurements of carbon dioxide levels: ASHRAE Proc. IAQ1986:603–610.
ForsterFGBurgessWA: Evaluation of gas cabinets used in the semiconductor industry: Chem Eng Monographs1986;24:175–191.
16.
PalauGLSettonYM: Supplemental ventilation control a contamination: Power Eng1988;92:30–33.
17.
PfeifferandWBrunkMF: Ventilation of welding halls: Energ Build1990;14:215–219.
18.
BreumNOSkotteJ: Displacement air flow in a printing plant measured with a rapid response tracer gas system: Build Serv EngTechn1991;12:39–43.
19.
CurdEF: Contamination control by the application of two and three dimensional wall jets; Proceedings of First International Conference on Environmental Pollution, ICEP1, Lisbon, European Centre for Pollution Research, 1991:250–255.
20.
SaamanenAAnderssonIMNiemelaRRosenG: Assessment of horizontal displacement flow with tracer gas pulse technique in reinforced plastic plants: Build Environ1995;30:135–141.
21.
PannkokeT: Industrial HVAC: A survey of design considerations: HPAC1996;68:1–7.
22.
GillKEPattersonJH: HVAC and controls retrofit of a manufacturing plant: part I: HPAC1998;70:1–5.
23.
MinichielloF: Indoor air quality control by outdoor airflow variation in HVAC systems: Int J Ambient Energy1999;20:115–124.
24.
DeavesDMGilhamSSpencerH: Mitigation of dense gas releases in buildings: Use of simple models: J Hazardous Mater2000;71:129–157.
25.
HayashiTIshizuYKatoSMurakamiS: CFD analysis on characteristics of contaminated indoor air ventilation and its application in the evaluation of the effects of contaminant inhalation by a human occupant: Build Environ2002;37:219–230.
26.
ChaoCYHWanMP: Experimental study of ventilation performance and contaminant distribution of underfloor ventilation systems versus traditional ceiling based ventilation system: Indoor Air2004;14:306–316.
27.
HuntGRKayeNB: Pollutant flushing with natural displacement ventilation: Build Environ2006;41:1190––1197.
28.
BolsterDTLindenPF: Contaminants in ventilated filling boxes: J Fluid Mech2007;591:97–116.
29.
WanMPChaoCYH: Transport characteristics of expiratory droplets and droplet nuclei in indoor environments with different ventilation air flow patterns: J Biomech Eng, T-ASME2007;129:341–353.
30.
WangLChenQ: Applications of a coupled multizone and CFD model to calculate airflow and contaminant dispersion in built environment for emergency management: HVAC&R Res2008;14:925–939.
31.
IssaRI: Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting: J Comput Phys1986;62:40–65.
32.
ChungKCHsuSP: Effect of ventilation pattern on room air and contaminant distribution: Build Environ2001;36:989–998.
