The aim of this study was to determine whether the large investments in vocational rehabilitation made in Sweden during the 1990s had improved the level of return to work for young employees and to study the factors predicting return to work. The study population comprised all employees under 30 years of age whose reports on work-related disorders were under consideration at regional social insurance offices in Västerbotten county in 1990 and 1994 (n=266). Between these years, increased efforts were made by the Swedish government to improve vocational rehabilitation. Data was collected from the register and by means of questionnaires. It was found that employees with musculoskeletal disorders were more likely to return to work during periods of intensive vocational rehabilitation. No increase in the level of return to work was apparent if all disorders were considered. Men showed a higher level of return to work than women, although women were better educated.
Järvholm B (ed). Working life and health. A Swedish survey. Solna: National Board of Occupational Safety and Health, National Institute for Working Life, Swedish Council for Work Life Research, 1996.
2.
Lagerlöf E.Women work and health. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs Ds1993: 98, Stockholm: Fritzes, 1993.
3.
Rehabiliteringsberedningen.Early and co-ordinated rehabilitation. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget, 1998. [Statens offentliga utredningar1988: 41] (in Swedish).
4.
Arbetsmiljökommissionen.Work and health. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget, 1990. [Statens offentliga utredningar1990: 49] (in Swedish).
5.
Statistical Yearbook of Sweden 1991. Örebro : Statistics Sweden1991.
6.
Women and men in Sweden. Facts and figures. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, 1995 .
7.
Swedish national committee on gender disparities in patient care.Gender equality in health care. [Statens offentliga utredningar1996: 133]. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, International Secretariat, Stockholm, 1996.
8.
Bäckström I.To sift the wheat from the chaff. On work-oriented rehabilitation of people on long-term sick-leave. Umeå: Umeå University, 1997 (in Swedish, English summary).
9.
Sandström J.Clinical and social factors in rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain. Scand J Rehab Med1986; 18: 35-43.
10.
Eklund M.On vocational rehabilitation in northern Sweden, with focus on life satisfaction and outcome prediction. Umeå: Umeå University, 1991.
11.
Straaton KV, Masiak R., Wrigley M., Fine P.Musculoskeletal disability, employment, and rehabilitation. J Rheumatol1995 ; 22 (3): 505-13.
12.
Tate DGWorker's disability and return to work. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1992; 71 (2): 92-6.
13.
Riipinen M., Hurri H., Alaranta H.Evaluating the outcome of vocational rehabilitation. Scand J Rehab Med1994; 26: 103 -12.
14.
Badley E., Ibanez D.Socio-economic risk factors and musculoskeletal disability. J Rheumatol1994; 21: 515-22.
15.
Suarez J., Arguelles J., Costales M., Arechaga C., Cabeza F., Vijande M.Factors influencing the return to work of patients after hip replacement and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996 ; 77: 269-72.
16.
Schmidt SH, Oort-Marburger D., Meijman TFEmployment after rehabilitation for musculoskeletal impairments: the impact of vocational rehabilitation and working on a trial basis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 950 - 4.
17.
Ekberg K., Wildhagen I.Long-term sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. The necessary intervention of work conditions. Scand J Rehab Med1996; 28: 39-47.
18.
Bradley H.Men's work, women's work A sociological history of the sexual division of labour in employment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
19.
Harding S.The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes: Cornell University Press, 1986.
20.
Gonäs L.Transformation of the welfare state and its labour markets. Reprint No. 1. Stockholm: The Swedish Institute for Working Life Research, 1994.
21.
Hammarström A., Hovelius B.Women's health from a gender perspective. Nord Med1994; 109: 288 - 91. (in Swedish, English abstract).
22.
Oakley A.Who cares for health? Social relations, gender, and the public health. J Epidemiol Community Health1994; 48: 427-34.
23.
Talo S., Hendler N., Brodie J.Effects of active and completed litigation on treatment results. Workers' compensation patients compared with other litigation patients. J Occup Med1989; 31 (3): 265-9.
24.
Tate DGFactors influencing injured employees return to work. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counselling1992; 23 (2): 17-20.
25.
Sheikh K., Mattingly S.Employment rehabilitation. outcome and prediction. Am J Ind Med1984; 5: 383-93.
26.
Hall EMGender, work control and stress: a theoretical discussion and an empirical test. International Journal of Health Services1989; 19 (4): 725-45.
27.
Karasek R., Theorell T.Healthy work. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers, 1990.
28.
Hamberg K., Johansson E., Lindgren G., Westman G.The impact of marital relationship on the rehabilitation process in a group of women with long-term musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Soc Med1997; 25: 17-25.
29.
Nätti J.Part-time work in the Nordic countries: a trap for women. Labour1995; 9: 343-57.
30.
Doyal L.What makes women sick. Gender and the political economy of health. London: Macmillan Press, 1995.
31.
Miles A.Women, health and medicine. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1991.
32.
Barnekow-Bergkvist M., Hedberg G., Janlert U., Jansson E.Physical activity pattern in men and women at the age of 16 and 34 and development of physical activity from adolescence to adulthood. Scand J Med Sci Sports1996; 6: 359-70.
33.
Thomsson H.Women's opportunities for well-being, studies of women's work, leisure and health-related behaviour patterns. Stockholm: Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm, 1996.
34.
Gelb-Safran D., Rogers WH, Tarlov AR, McHorney CA, Ware Jr JEGender differences in medical treatment: the case of physician-prescribed activity restrictions. Soc Sci Med1997; 45 (5): 711-22.
