Effects on birthweights of maternal education,socio-economic status,and work-related characteristics

Abstract

Birthweights of 3,451 infants of women registered for antenatal care in Uppsala County, Sweden, were analyzed using three different maternal socio-economic indicators; education, socio-economic status and work environment exposure characteristics. Other explanatory variables were maternal age, parity, height, smoking habits, and length of gestation. Mean birthweights increase with longer education and higher socio-economic status. No general pattern was seen for work environment characteristics. When smoking habits are controlled for, social differences in birthweight decrease to non-significant values. A regression model with a socio-economic indicator alone explains only a minor part, less than 1%, of the variation in birthweight. When smoking is included, adding a socio-economic indicator does not significantly improve the model. Practically all social differences in birthweight are related to the differences in maternal age, parity, height, and smoking habits. If a socio-economic indicator is to be included in the analysis of birthweights (for other reasons like international comparisons), we recommend education.

Keywords

birthweight socio-economic indicator education socio-economic status work exposure characteristics smoking multiple linear regression

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arntzen A , Samuelsen SO , Magnus P , Bakketeig LS. Birth weight related to social indicators in Norway . Eur J Public Health 1994; 4: 92–7.

Fryers T. Pre- and perinatal factors in the etiology of mental retardation. In: Kiely M , ed. Reproductive and perinatal epidemiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press;, 1991: 171–204.

Antonovsky A , Bernstein J. Social class and infant mortality . Soc Sci Med 1977; 11: 453–70.

Meyer M , Jonas BS , Tonascia JA. Perinatal events associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy . Am J Epidemiol 1976; 103: 464–76.

Seidman D , Samueloff A , Mor-Yosef S , Schenker JG. The effect of maternal age and socioeconomical background on neonatal outcome . Int J Gynecol Obstet 1990; 33: 7–12.

Brooke O , Anderson HR , Bland JM , Peacock JL , Stewart CM. Effects on birth weight of smoking, alcohol, caffeine, socioeconomic factors, and psychosocial stress . BMJ 1989; 298: 795–801.

Hemminki E , Meriläinen J , Malin M , Rahkonen O , Teperi J. Mother's education and perinatal problems in Finland . Int J Epidemiol 1992; 21: 720–4.

Kiely M , ed. Reproductive and perinatal epidemiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1991.

Hemminki E , Malin M , Rahkonen O. Mother's social class and perinatal problems in a low-problem area . Int J Epidemiol 1990; 19: 983–90.

10.

Cnattingius S , Lindmark G , Meirik O.

Who continues to smoke while pregnant?

J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 218–21.

11.

Reports on statistical co-ordination 1982. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden; 1984.

12.

Johnson J , Stewart W , Fredlund P , Hall EM , Theorell T. Psychosocial job exposure matrix: An occupationally aggregated attribution system for work environment exposure characteristics. Stockholm 1990 (National Institute for Psychosocial Factors and Health: Publication no 221).

13.

Newbold P. Statistics for business and economics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.; 1984: 525–6.

14.

SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's guide, Version 6, Fourth Ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 1989.

15.

Baird D. Changing problems and priorities in obstetrics . Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 115–21.

16.

Berkowitz G , Papiernik E. Epidemiology of preterm birth . Epidemiologic Reviews 1993; 15(2): 414–43.

17.

Morrison J , Najman JM , Williams GM , Keeping JD , Andersen MJ. Socio-economic status and pregnancy outcome. An Australian study . Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 298–307.

18.

Brink Henriksen T , Hedegaard M , Secher NJ. The relation between psychosocial job strain, and preterm delivery and low birthweight for gestational age . Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 764–74.

19.

Lindmark G. Womens need for leave of absence during pregnancy should be met without being classified as an illness. (In Swedish) . Lakartidningen 1992; 89: 1882–4.