Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims:

Because media portrayal reflects and shapes public opinion and health policy, investigating news coverage of public health issues is highly relevant for public health research and practice. Addressing a topical issue, this study investigated how newspaper coverage framed COVID-19 vaccines in Austria and German-speaking Switzerland and how it developed over time.

Methods:

A quantitative newspaper content analysis of six newspapers from Austria and German-speaking Switzerland published between January 1 and 31, 2022 was conducted. Frames were identified for each country separately through hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward’s method) based on frame elements.

Results:

Four frames were identified in both countries: (1) Evaluating new vaccines, (2) Discussing mandates, (3) Promoting vaccination, (4) Mentioning vaccines. In Frames 1 (Switzerland 86.4%, Austria 93.3%) and 3 (Switzerland 92.7%, Austria 98.9%), most articles included vaccine-endorsing statements, with Swiss coverage including additional negative statements more often than Austrian coverage (43.2%/44.6% vs 4.0%/3.3%). Frame 2 was closely linked to vaccine skepticism only in Austria and contained more evaluative statements in Austrian newspapers (25.4% endorsing, 35.4% rejecting; in Switzerland 14.5%/18.1%). The Austrian tabloid Kronen Zeitung published most articles (497/1091, 45.6%).

Conclusions:

The commercialized and comparatively high share of tabloid news coverage in Austria may have contributed to oversimplified and polarizing COVID-19 vaccine debates in this context. Insufficiently balanced and adequate information may contribute to a loss of public trust in vaccination and may therefore affect vaccination uptake. Authorities and public health professionals should consider this effect when designing information campaigns.

Keywords

COVID-19 vaccination public debate print media content analysis frame analysis Switzerland Austria

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lueck

Callaghan

Inside the ‘black box’ of COVID-19 vaccination beliefs: revealing the relative importance of public confidence and news consumption habits. Soc Sci Med 2022;298: 114874.

Frissen

Coninck

D de

Matthys

, et al. Longitudinal evidence of how media audiences differ in public health perceptions and behaviors during a global pandemic. Front Public Health 2020;8:583408.

Piltch-Loeb

Savoia

Goldberg

, et al. Examining the effect of information channel on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. PLoS ONE 2021;16:e0251095.

Martin

Vanderslott

“Any idea how fast ‘It’s just a mask!’ can turn into ‘It’s just a vaccine!’”: From mask mandates to vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine 2022;40:7488–99.

Norris

A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

McCombs

Guo

Agenda-setting influence of the media in the public sphere. In: Fortner

Fackler

(eds) The handbook of media and mass communication theory. Chichester: Wiley, 2014, pp. 249–68.

Nielsen

Fletcher

Newman

, et al. Navigating the ‘infodemic’: how people in six countries access and rate news and information about coronavirus, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/infodemic-how-people-six-countries-access-and-rate-news-and-information-about-coronavirus (2020, accessed 4 May 2023).

Henderson

Hilton

The media and public health: where next for critical analysis?

Crit Public Health 2018;28:373–6.

Catalan-Matamoros

Penafiel-Saiz

The print media in times of anti-vaccine lobby: a content analysis of national newspaper reporting in Spain. West J Commun 2021;85:692–713.

10.

Ghasiya

Okamura

Investigating COVID-19 news across four nations: a topic modeling and sentiment analysis approach. IEEE Access 2021;9:36645–56.

11.

Jiang

Hyland

COVID-19 in the news: the first 12 months. Int J Appl Linguistics 2022;32:241–58.

12.

Chong

Druckman

JN.

Framing Theory. Annu Rev Polit Sci 2007;10:103–26.

13.

Entman

RM.

Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 1993;43:51–8.

14.

Teune

Przeworski

The logic of comparative social inquiry: New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1970.

15.

Mathieu

Ritchie

Ortiz-Ospina

, et al. A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations. Nat Hum Behav 2021;5:947–53.

16.

Deml

Buhl

Huber

, et al. Trust, affect, and choice in parents’ vaccination decision-making and health-care provider selection in Switzerland. Sociol Health Illn 2022;44:41–58.

17.

Schmid

Holzmann

Schwarz

, et al. Measles outbreak linked to a minority group in Austria, 2008. Epidemiol Infect 2010;138:415–25.

18.

Hallin

Mancini

Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

19.

Lucht

Udris

Kommerzialisierung und Konzentration der Medien im internationalen Vergleich [Commercialization and concentration of the media in an international comparison]. In: fög - Forschungsinstitut Öffentlichkeit und Gesellschaft (eds) Jahrbuch Qualität der Medien 2013. Zurich: Schwabe Verlag, 2013.

20.

Blum

Lautsprecher und Widersprecher: Ein Ansatz zum Vergleich der Mediensysteme [Speakers and opponents: an approach to comparing media systems]. Köln: Herbert von Halem, 2014.

21.

Wirth

Kolb

Designs and methods of comparative political communication research. In: Esser

Pfetsch

(eds) Comparing political communication: theories, cases, and challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 87–111.

22.

Matthes

What’s in a Frame?: A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990–2005. Journal Mass Commun Q 2009;86:349–67.

23.

Matthes

Kohring

The content analysis of media frames: toward improving reliability and validity. J Commun 2008;58:258–79.

24.

Fleiss

Levin

Paik

. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003.

25.

Krippendorff

Testing the reliability of content analysis data. In: Krippendorff

Block

(eds) The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 350–7.

26.

Holtzman

Bernhardt

Mountcastle-Shah

, et al. The quality of media reports on discoveries related to human genetic diseases. Community Genet 2005;8:133–44.

27.

Eberl

J-M

Lebernegg

The pandemic through the social media lens: correlates of COVID-19-related social media use in Austria. MJ 2022;45:5–15.

28.

Sprengholz

Korn

Eitze

, et al. Attitude toward a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy and its determinants: evidence from serial cross-sectional surveys conducted throughout the pandemic in Germany. Vaccine 2022;40:7370–7.

29.

Ihlen

Toledano

Just

. Using rhetorical situations to examine and improve vaccination communication. Front Commun 2021;6.

30.

Desson

Kauer

Otten

, et al. Finding the way forward: COVID-19 vaccination progress in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Health Policy Technol 2022;11:100584.

31.

Dietrich

Lüthy

Lucas Ramanathan

, et al. Healthcare professional and professional stakeholders’ perspectives on vaccine mandates in Switzerland: a mixed-methods study. Vaccine 2022;40:7397–7405.

32.

Bailard

CS.

Do local newspapers mitigate the effects of the polarized national rhetoric on COVID-19?

Int J Press Polit, 2022.

33.

Ruiz

Bell

RA.

Predictors of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: results of a nationwide survey. Vaccine 2021;39:1080–6.

34.

Parsons Leigh

Halperin

Mizen

, et al. Exploring the impact of media and information on self-reported intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: a qualitative interview-based study. Hum Vaccines Immunother 2022;18:e2048623.

35.

Paul

Zimmermann

Corsico

, et al. Anticipating hopes, fears and expectations towards COVID-19 vaccines: a qualitative interview study in seven European countries. SSM Qual Res Health 2022;2:100035.

36.

Stamm

Partheymüller

Mosor

, et al. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine fatigue. Nat Med 2023;29:1164–71.

37.

Eisenegger

Oehmer

Udris

, et al. Die Qualität der Medienberichterstattung zur Corona-Pandemie [The quality of media reporting during the COVID-19 pandemic]. In: Forschungszentrum Öffentlichkeit und Gesellschaft (fög) (eds) Jahrbuch Qualität der Medien Schweiz. Basel: Schwabe, 2020, pp. 29–50.

38.

Riffe

Aust

Lacy

SR.

Effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling. In: Krippendorff

Block

(eds) The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 54–9.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB

0.06 MB

0.60 MB