Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aim: To examine trends in socioeconomic differences in daily smoking among 15-year-old Danes between 1991–2014, using occupational social class as indicator of socioeconomic status. Methods: The study included 15-year-olds participating in seven Danish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children studies between 1991–2014, n = 8,641. The analyses focused on absolute socioeconomic differences (prevalence difference between low and high occupational social class) and relative socioeconomic differences communicated by odds ratio for daily smoking. Results: The prevalence of daily smoking declined from 18.6% in 1991 to 4.5% in 2014. Across all surveys, the prevalence was 8.9% in high, 12.8% in middle and 16.5% in low occupational social classes (p < 0.0001). The absolute socioeconomic differences increased from 1991 to 2006 and declined thereafter. Across all survey years, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for daily smoking was 1.40 (1.19–1.65) in middle and 1.90 (1.56-2.32) in low versus high occupational social classes. The statistical interaction between occupational social class and survey year was significant (p = 0.0404), suggesting increasing relative socioeconomic differences from 1991 to 2014. Conclusions : There was a substantial decline in daily smoking among 15-year-olds between 1991–2014 in all occupational social class groups. The prevalence of daily smoking was highest in the low occupational social class during the entire period. The absolute socioeconomic differences in daily smoking increased between 1991–2006 and declined thereafter. The relative socioeconomic differences increased over 1991–2014. Studies of change in socioeconomic differences over time should address both absolute and relative socioeconomic differences as they may result in different conclusions and because important improvement in prevalence patterns may be disguised by exclusive focus on changes in relative socioeconomic differences.

Keywords

Adolescents Denmark smoking socioeconomic differences trend study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Riggs

Chou

, et al. Adolescent to emerging adulthood smoking trajectories: When do smoking trajectories diverge, and do they predict early adulthood nicotine dependence? Nicotine Tob Res 2007; 9: 1147–1154.

Lessov-Schlaggar

Hops

Brigham

, et al. Adolescent smoking trajectories and nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tob Res 2008; 10: 341–351.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: 50 years of progress. A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2014.

Hublet

De Bacquer

Välimaa

Smoking trends among adolescents from 1990 to 2002 in ten European countries and Canada. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 280.

de Looze

ter Bogt

Hublet

, et al. Trends in educational differences in adolescent daily smoking across Europe, 2002–2010. Eur J Public Health 2013; 23: 846–852.

Rasmussen

Due

Damsgaard

, et al. Social inequality in adolescent daily smoking: Has it changed over time? Scan J Public Health 2009; 37: 287–294.

Schnohr

Kreiner

Rasmussen

, et al. School-related mediators in social inequalities in smoking: A comparative cross-sectional study of 20,399 adolescents. Int J Equity Health 2009; 8: 17.

Richter

Leppin

Trends in socio-economic differences in tobacco smoking among German schoolchildren, 1994–2002. Eur J Public Health 2007; 17: 565–571.

Moor

Rathmann

Lenzi

, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent smoking across 35 countries: A multilevel analysis of the role of family, school and peers. Eur J Public Health 2015; 25: 457–463.

10.

Svedberg

Nygren

Staland-Nyman

, et al. The validity of socioeconomic status measures among adolescents based on self-reported information about parents’ occupation, FAS and perceived SES; implications for health-related quality of life studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016; 16: 48.

11.

Galobardes

Lynch

Smith

. Measuring socioeconomic position in health research. Br Med Bull 2007; 81–82: 21–37.

12.

Pförtner

T-K

Günther

Levin

, et al. The use of parental occupation in adolescent health surveys. An application of ISCO-based measures of occupational status. J Epidemiol Community Health 2015; 69: 177–184.

13.

De Clercq

Abel

Moor

, et al. Social inequality in adolescents’ healthy food intake: The interplay between economic, social and cultural capital. Eur J Public Health 2017; 27: 279–286.

14.

Christensen

Krølner

Nilsson

, et al. Addressing social inequality in aging by the Danish occupational social class measurement. J Aging Health 2014; 26: 106–127.

15.

Inchley

Currie

Young

, et al. Growing up unequal: Gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2016.

16.

Roberts

Freeman

Samdal

, et al. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: Methodological developments and current tensions. Int J Public Health 2009; 54: 140–150.

17.

Lien

Friestad

Klepp

KI.

Adolescents’ proxy reports of parents’ socioeconomic status: How valid are they?

J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55: 731–737.

18.

West

Sweeting

Speed

We really do know what you do: A comparison of reports from 11-year-olds and their parents in respect of parental economic activity and occupation. Sociol 2001: 35: 539–559.

19.

Pförtner

Hublet

Schnohr

, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in the impact of tobacco control policies on adolescent smoking. A multilevel study in 29 European countries. Addict Behav 2016; 53: 58–66.

20.

Hublet

Schmid

Clays

, et al. Association between tobacco control policies and smoking behaviour among adolescents in 29 European countries. Addiction 2009; 104: 1918–1926.

21.

Schnohr

Kreiner

Rasmussen

, et al. The role of national policies intended to regulate adolescent smoking in explaining the prevalence of daily smoking: A study of adolescents from 27 European countries. Addiction 2008; 103: 824–831.

22.

Kuipers

de Korte

Soto

, et al. School smoking policies and educational inequalities in smoking behaviour of adolescents aged 14–17 years in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016; 70: 132–139.

23.

Vestbo

Pisinger

Bast

, et al. Prevention of smoking among children and youth: Which means are effective? (In Danish: Forebyggelse af rygning blandt børn og unge. Hvad virker? ). Copenhagen: The Council on Health and Disease Prevention, 2018.

24.

Pampel

FC.

Socioeconomic distinction, cultural tastes, and cigarette smoking. Soc Sci Q 2006; 87: 19–35.

25.

Link

Phelan

Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav 1995; Spec No: 80–4.

26.

Bosdriesz

Willemsen

Stronks

, et al. Tobacco control policy and socio-economic inequalities in smoking in 27 European countries. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016; 165:79–86.

27.

Rogers

EM.

Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press, 1962.

28.

Andersen

Krølner

Bast

, et al. Effects of the X:IT smoking intervention: A school-based cluster randomized trial. Int J Epidemiol 2015; 44: 1900–1908.

29.

Bast

Due

Bendtsen

, et al. High impact of implementation on school-based smoking prevention: the X:IT study-a cluster-randomized smoking prevention trial. Implement Sci 2016; 11: 125.

Trends in socioeconomic differences in daily smoking among 15-year-old Danes 1991–2014

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References