Sustained return to work and work participation after a new legislation obligating employers to notify prolonged sickness absence

Abstract

Aims: Return to work (RTW) after prolonged sickness absence benefits both the individual and society. However, the effectiveness of legislation aiming to improve RTW remains uncertain. We examined whether sustained RTW and work participation were different before and after a legislative change enacted in 2012 (i.e. an intervention) that obligated employers to give notice of prolonged sickness absence to occupational health services. Methods: Two random samples (2010 and 2013) of the Finnish working aged population (70%, ~2.6 million each) were drawn. Using survival analysis, we assessed sustained RTW (≥28 consecutive working days) during a two-month follow-up after a sickness absence minimum of 30 calendar days in the pre- and post-intervention period. We also identified pathways for RTW with cluster analysis and calculated relative gain in work participation in the total sample and by several population subgroups. Results: In the total sample, sustained RTW was 4% higher and the mean time to sustained RTW was 0.42 days shorter in the post- than in the pre-intervention period. The estimates were larger among women than men and among those with mental disorders compared with other diagnoses. Changes in the pathways for sustained RTW indicated a 4.9% relative gain in work participation in the total sample. The gain was larger among those who lived in areas of low unemployment rate (20.6%) or worked in the public sector (11.9%). Conclusions: From 2010 to 2013, RTW and work participation increased among the employees with prolonged sickness absence, suggesting that the legislative change enhanced RTW. The change in work participation varied by population subgroup.

Keywords

Sickness absence register study return to work work participation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Virtanen

Kivimaki

Vahtera

et al , Sickness absence as a risk factor for job termination, unemployment, and disability pension among temporary and permanent employees. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:212–17.

Vahtera

Westerlund

Ferrie

et al

All-cause and diagnosis-specific sickness absence as a predictor of sustained suboptimal health: A 14-year follow-up in the GAZEL cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010;64:311–17.

OECD. Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264088856-en (2010, accessed 22 August 2017).

OECD. Sickness and disability schemes in the Netherlands. Country memo as a background paper for the OECD Disability Review, www.oecd.org/social/soc/41429917.pdf (2010, accessed 22 August 2017).

Aust

Helverskov

Nielsen

et al

The Danish national return-to-work program – aims, content, and design of the process and effect evaluation. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012;38:120–33.

Foss

Gravseth

Kristensen

et al

“Inclusive working life in Norway”: A registry-based five-year follow-up study. J Occup Med Toxicol 2013;8:19.

dos Santos

Tygesen

Eriksson

et al , Clinical decision support system (CDSS) – effects on care quality. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2014;27:707–18.

Försäkringskassan. Försäkringsmedicinska beslutsstödet- En långtidsuppföljning av förändringar I sjukskrivningsmönster [in Swedish, English summary]. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan, 2011.

Black

Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: TSO, 2008.

10.

Scottish Government. ANNEX A 2008/09 HEAT targets, www.gov.scot/Publications/2007/12/11103453/6 (2010, accessed 22 August 2017).

11.

Halonen

Solovieva

Pentti

et al

Effectiveness of legislative changes obligating notification of prolonged sickness absence and assessment of remaining work ability on return to work and work participation: A natural experiment in Finland. Occup Environ Med 2016;73:42–50.

12.

Statistics Finland. Statistical yearbook of Finland 2014 – labour market. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, 2014.

13.

Yeh

. Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual SAS® Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2002, http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi27/p229-27.pdf (accessed 22 August, 2017).

14.

Shiang

K-D.

The sickness absenceS® calculations of areas under the curve (AUC) for multiple metabolic readings, www.lexjansen.com/wuss/2004/posters/c_post_the_sas_calculations_.pdf (accessed 22 August 2017).

15.

Clayton

Barr

Nylen

et al

Effectiveness of return-to-work interventions for disabled people: A systematic review of government initiatives focused on changing the behaviour of employers. Eur J Public Health 2012;22:434–9.

16.

van Vilsteren

van Oostrom

de Vet

et al

Work-place interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;10:Cd006955.

17.

de Boer

Taskila

Tamminga

et al

Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;9:Cd007569.

18.

Nieuwenhuijsen

Faber

Verbeek

et al

Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;12:Cd006237.

19.

Hoefsmit

Houkes

Nijhuis

FJ.

Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: A systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil 2012;22:462–77.

20.

Smedley

Harris

Cox

et al

Evaluation of a case management service to reduce sickness absence. Occup Med (Lond) 2013;63:89–95.

21.

Schandelmaier

Ebrahim

Burkhardt

et al

Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One 2012;7:e49760.

22.

Aust

Nielsen

Grundtvig

et al

Implementation of the Danish return-to-work program: Process evaluation of a trial in 21 Danish municipalities. Scand J Work Environ Health 2015;41:529–41.

23.

Askildsen

Bratberg

Nilsen

OA.

Unemployment, labor force composition and sickness absence: A panel data study. Health Econ 2005; 4:1087–101.

24.

Leaker

Sickness absence from work in the UK. Econ Labour Market Rev 2008;2:18–22.

25.

Taylor

Cunningham

Newsome

et al

‘Too scared to go sick’– reformulating the research agenda on sickness absence. Industr Relat J 2010;41:270–88.

26.

Pfeifer

Cyclical absenteeism among private sector, public sector and self-employed workers. Health Econ Lett 2012;22:366–70.

27.

Heponiemi

Kuusio

Sinervo

et al

Job attitudes and well-being among public vs. private physicians: Organizational justice and job control as mediators. Eur J Public Health 2011;21:520–5.