Objective: In this article, I want to promote theoretical awareness and commitment among qualitative researchers in general practice and suggest adequate and feasible theoretical approaches. Approach: I discuss different theoretical aspects of qualitative research and present the basic foundations of the interpretative paradigm. Associations between paradigms, philosophies, methodologies and methods are examined and different strategies for theoretical commitment presented. Finally, I discuss the impact of theory for interpretation and the development of general practice knowledge. Main points: A scientific theory is a consistent and soundly based set of assumptions about a specific aspect of the world, predicting or explaining a phenomenon. Qualitative research is situated in an interpretative paradigm where notions about particular human experiences in context are recognized from different subject positions. Basic theoretical features from the philosophy of science explain why and how this is different from positivism. Reflexivity, including theoretical awareness and consistency, demonstrates interpretative assumptions, accounting for situated knowledge. Different types of theoretical commitment in qualitative analysis are presented, emphasizing substantive theories to sharpen the interpretative focus. Such approaches are clearly within reach for a general practice researcher contributing to clinical practice by doing more than summarizing what the participants talked about, without trying to become a philosopher. Conclusions: Qualitative studies from general practice deserve stronger theoretical awareness and commitment than what is currently established. Persistent attention to and respect for the distinctive domain of knowledge and practice where the research deliveries are targeted is necessary to choose adequate theoretical endeavours.
McWhinneyIR. Changing models: The Impact of Kuhn’s theory on medicine. Fam Pract1984;1(1): 3–8.
2.
McWhinneyIR. “An acquaintance with particulars…”. Fam Med1989;21:296–8.
3.
GreenhalghT. Intuition and evidence–uneasy bedfellows?Br J Gen Pract2002;52(478):395–400.
4.
HeathI. The problem of diagnosis. BMJ2012;345:e6595.
5.
HowieJG. Diagnosis–the Achilles heel?J R Coll Gen Pract1972;22(118):310–15.
6.
StolperEVan de WielMVan RoyenP. Gut feelings as a third track in general practitioners’ diagnostic reasoning. J Gen Intern Med2011;26(2):197–203.
7.
MalterudK. The art and science of clinical knowledge: Evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet2001;358(9279):397–400.
8.
ReevesSAlbertMKuperA. Why use theories in qualitative research?BMJ2008;337:a949.
9.
MorseJM. Theory innocent or theory smart?Qual Health Res2002;12(3):295–6.
10.
SandelowskiM. Theory unmasked: The uses and guises of theory in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health1993;16(3):213–8.
11.
ThorneS. The science and art of theoretical location. Evid Based Nurs2014;17(2):31.
12.
CarterSMLittleM. Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qual Health Res2007;17(10):1316–28.
13.
MalterudK. Shared understanding of the qualitative research process. Guidelines for the medical researcher. Fam Pract1993;10(2):201–6.
14.
MalterudK. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet2001;358(9280):483–8.
15.
StigeBMalterudKMidtgardenT. Toward an agenda for evaluation of qualitative research. Qual Health Res2009;19(10):1504–16.
16.
CrottyM. The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process. London/Thousand Oaks/New Dehli: SAGE Publications, 2003.
17.
AlvessonMSköldbergK. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Los Angeles/London: SAGE Publications, 2009.
HoeyerK. What is theory, and how does theory relate to method? In: VallgardaSKochL (eds) Research methods in public health [Forskningsmetoder i folkesundhedsvidenskab, translated from Danish]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal Akademisk, 2008, pp.17–41.
20.
GlaserBStraussA. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1999.
21.
KuhnTS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
22.
ChamberlainK. Methodolatry and qualitative health research. J Health Psychol2000;5(3):285–96.
23.
KvaleS. InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 1996.
24.
CodeL. Ignorance, Injustice and the politics of knowledge. Austr Fem Stud2014;29(80):148–60.
25.
BergerPLLuckmannT. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin, 1967.
26.
LyotardJ-F. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
27.
MalterudK. Reflexivity and metapositions: Strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence. J Eval Clin Pract2002;8(2):121–6.
28.
FinlayL. Introducing reflexivity. In: FinlayLGoughB (eds) Reflexivity – A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Wiley, 2008, pp.3–20.
29.
NagelT. The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
MalinowskiB. A scientific theory of culture. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 1944.
32.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London/New York: Routledge, 2007.
33.
PotterJWetherellM. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage, 1987.
34.
AustinJL. How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.
35.
SkagestadP. The road of inquiry. Charles Peirce’s pragmatic realism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981.
36.
GarfinkelH. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
37.
ButlerJ. Gender trouble. New York: Routledge, 1990.
38.
GiorgiA. The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2009.
39.
CreswellJW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2013.
40.
PattonMQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2002.
41.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJ. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2014.
42.
DenzinNKLincolnYS. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2008.
43.
MalterudK. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2011.
44.
BraunVClarkeV. What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being2014;9:26152.
45.
ThorneS. Interpretive description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc., 2008.
SteihaugSAhlsenBMalterudK.“I am allowed to be myself”: Women with chronic muscular pain being recognized. Scand J Publ Health2002;30(4):281–7.
48.
SchibbyeA-LL. The role of “recognition” in the resolution of a specific interpersonal dilemma. J Phenomenol Psychol1993;24(2):175–89.
49.
AntonovskyA. Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
50.
BjorkmanMMalterudK. Lesbian women coping with challenges of minority stress: A qualitative study. Scand J Publ Health2012;40(3):239–44.
51.
VygotskyL. Thought and language. Cambridge/London: MIT Press, 1988.
52.
StenslandPMalterudK. Unravelling empowering internal voices – a case study on the interactive use of illness diaries. Fam Pract2001;18(4):425–9.
53.
NessaJ.From a medical consultation to a written text. 2. Pragmatics and textlinguistics applied to medicine. Scand J Prim Health Care1995;13(2):89–92.
54.
NessaJ.From a medical consultation to a written text. 1. Transcribing the doctor-patient dialogue. Scand J Prim Health Care1995;13(2):83–8.
55.
EdwardsRB. Mental health as rational autonomy. J Med Philos1981;6(3):309–22.
56.
NessaJMalterudK. Tell me what’s wrong with me: A discourse analysis approach to the concept of patient autonomy. J Med Ethics1998;24(6):394–400.
57.
LarsenMOldeideCCMalterudK. Not so bad after all…, Women’s experiences of pelvic examinations. Fam Pract1997;14(2):148–52.
58.
CodeL. What can she know?: Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.
59.
NilsenSMalterudKWernerEL. GPs’ negotiation strategies regarding sick leave for subjective health complaints. Scand J Prim Health Care2015:1–7. Epub ahead of print 21January2015. DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1001943.
60.
LipskyM. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1980.
61.
MalterudK. Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Publ Health2012;40(8):795–805.
62.
GuassoraADReventlowSMalterudK. Shame, honor and responsibility in clinical dialog about lifestyle issues: A qualitative study about patients’ presentations of self. Patient Educ Couns2014;97(2):195–9.
63.
GoffmanE. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Books, 1959/1990.
64.
ScheffTJ. Shame and the social bond: A sociological theory. Sociological Theory2000;18(1):84–99.
65.
LewinK. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. London: Tavistock, 1952.
66.
HenwoodKLPidgeonNF. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol1992;83(Pt 1):97–111.
67.
WilsonHSHutchinsonSA. Methodologic mistakes in grounded theory. Nurs Res1996;45(2):122–4.
68.
HarawayD. Situated knowledges; the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: HarawayD (ed.) Simians, cyborgs, and women the reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge, 1991, pp.183–201.
69.
CodeL. Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations. New York: Routledge, 1995.
70.
RichardsL. Closeness to data: The changing goals of qualitative data handling. Qual Health Res1998;8(3):319–28.
71.
RicoeurP. Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Christian University Press, 1976.
72.
van MaanenM. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario: Althouse Press, 1990.
73.
RiessmanCK. Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, 1993.
74.
JanesickVJ. The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1994, pp.209–19.
