Aims: The aim of the present study was to describe the intake of whole grain (WG) in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, and to investigate what proportion of the study population that met the new WG recommendation (75 g WG/day per 10 MJ). Methods: Descriptive study. Data is from one 24h dietary recall (24HDR) collected in 1995–2000 from a subset (n = 8,702) of the large Scandinavian cohort “HELGA” consisting of participants aged 30–65 years from three cohorts. Results: The mean WG intake was far below the recommended level. Between 16% (Danish men) and 35% (Norwegian women) consumed at least the recommended intake of WG. Among women, the median intake of WG products (g WG products/day) was 114 g/day in Norway and 108 g/day in Denmark, whereas the intake was much lower in Sweden (64 g/day). For women, the median intake of WG in absolute amounts (g WG/day) was again highest in Norway (44 g/day), but lower in both Sweden (35 g/day) and Denmark (31 g/day). For men (no data available for Norwegian men), the intake of WG products was higher in Denmark (138 g/day) compared to Sweden (79 g/day), but when looking at the WG intake in absolute amounts, the intake was highest in Sweden (49 g/day) compared to Denmark (41 g/day). Conclusions: The present study described the intake of WG as well as the sources of WG in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Between 16% and 35% met the new recommendations on intake of WG.
de MunterJSHuFBSpiegelmanDFranzMvan DamRM. Whole grain, bran, and germ intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and systematic review. PLoS Med2007;4(8):e261.
JacobsDRJrMarquartLSlavinJKushiLH. Whole-grain intake and cancer: an expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer1998;30(2):85–96.
4.
HaasPMachadoMJAntonAASilvaASDeFA. Effectiveness of whole grain consumption in the prevention of colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Food Sci Nutr2009;Mar21:1–13.
5.
HarlandJIGartonLE. Whole-grain intake as a marker of healthy body weight and adiposity. Public Health Nutr2008;11(6):554–63.
6.
SlavinJLJacobsDMarquartL. Grain processing and nutrition. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr2000;40(4):309–26.
JensenMKKoh-BanerjeePFranzMSampsonLGronbaekMRimmEB. Whole grains, bran, and germ in relation to homocysteine and markers of glycemic control, lipids, and inflammation 1. Am J Clin Nutr2006;83(2):275–83.
13.
LundEDumeauxVBraatenTHjartakerAEngesetDSkeieG. Cohort profile: the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study – NOWAC – Kvinner og kreft. Int J Epidemiol2008;37(1):36–41.
14.
HallmansGAgrenAJohanssonGJohanssonAStegmayrBJanssonJH. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study Cohort – evaluation of risk factors and their interactions. Scand J Public Health Suppl2003;61:18–24.
15.
TjonnelandAOlsenABollKStrippCChristensenJEngholmG. Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in diet, cancer and health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57,053 men and women in Denmark. Scand J Public Health2007;35(4):432–41.
16.
SlimaniNKaaksRFerrariPCasagrandeCClavel-ChapelonFLotzeG. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics. Public Health Nutr2002;5(6B):1125–45.
17.
SlimaniNFerrariPOckeMWelchABoeingHLiereM. Standardization of the 24-hour diet recall calibration method used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): general concepts and preliminary results. Eur J Clin Nutr2000;54(12):900–17.
Koh-BanerjeePFranzMSampsonLLiuSJacobsDRJrSpiegelmanD. Changes in whole-grain, bran, and cereal fiber consumption in relation to 8-y weight gain among men. Am J Clin Nutr2004;80(5):1237–45.
21.
ThaneCWJonesARStephenAMSealCJJebbSA. Comparative whole-grain intake of British adults in 1986-7 and 2000-1. Br J Nutr2007;97(5):987–92.
22.
MontonenJKnektPJarvinenRAromaaAReunanenA. Whole-grain and fiber intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr2003;77(3):622–9.
23.
MancinoLKuchlerFLeibtagE. Getting consumers to eat more whole-grains: the role of policy, information, and food manufacturers. Food Policy2008;33:489–96.
24.
LundEKumleMBraatenTHjartakerABakkenKEggenE. External validity in a population-based national prospective study – the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Cancer Causes Control2003;14(10):1001–8.
25.
WeinehallLHallgrenCGWestmanGJanlertUWallS. Reduction of selection bias in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease through involvement of primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care1998;16(3):171–6.
26.
KyroCSkeieGDragstedLOChristensenJOvervadKHallmansG. Intake of whole grains in Scandinavia is associated with healthy lifestyle, socio-economic and dietary factors. Public Health Nutr PrepublishedFeb22, 2011; DOI:10.1017/S136898001100020610.1017/S1368980011000206.
27.
BeatonGHMilnerJMcGuireVFeatherTELittleJA. Source of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Carbohydrate sources, vitamins, and minerals. Am J Clin Nutr1983;37(6):986–95.
28.
BrustadMSkeieGBraatenTSlimaniNLundE. Comparison of telephone vs face-to-face interviews in the assessment of dietary intake by the 24 h recall EPIC SOFT program – the Norwegian calibration study. Eur J Clin Nutr2003;57(1):107–13.
29.
WirfaltEMcTaggartAPalaVGullbergBFrascaGPanicoS. Food sources of carbohydrates in a European cohort of adults. Public Health Nutr2002;5(6B):1197–215.
